Developments near Ashland stir concerns
Four developments totaling more than 1,300 residential units and at least 850,000 square feet of commercial space could dramatically alter the landscape of Ashland's fringes.
But some Hanover County residents worry that their rural community is on the verge of becoming congested, overdeveloped and indistinguishable from other suburban areas.
The state Route 54 corridor that lies east of Interstate 95 is ripe for development. There's one residential community under construction, Woodside Estates, which will have 158 homes. Farther east, Hickory Hill has been approved for 277 homes, but no work has begun.
Developers for the county's first mixed-use project, Providence Creek, await the green light from the Board of Supervisors this month.
Lastly, there's East Ashland, a controversial development that would be inside and outside Ashland's town limits. It would include residential spaces, two hotels, restaurants and a retail shopping center. Though the town approved its plans for East Ashland, county officials say they don't yet have an application.
Mitchell Bode, project manager for Wilton Development Company, East Ashland's developer, said they plan to present an application to the county by May 1.
Residents who live in the area worry that their community is changing too quickly and without enough thought about traffic and the impact on current residents.
Russell Buchanan lives on Mount Hermon Road, near where East Ashland would be built. He anticipates that the Route 54-Interstate 95 interchange will become insufficient to handle the increased traffic. He said the same thing happened at the Atlee/Elmont interchange before a new interchange was constructed in 1999.
"History is going to repeat itself," he said. "Despite the best efforts of our elected officials, we always end up with the cart before the horse."
Martha Wingfield lives along Route 54 east of the developments. She said she drives through that area daily to get to Ashland and elsewhere.
"I know this area is going to develop, but does this kind of density make sense?" she asked, comparing East Ashland and Providence Creek with Short Pump's West Broad Village, all mixed-use communities.
The idea behind mixed-use areas is that you can walk to destinations, Wingfield said, but she still would have to drive between East Ashland and Providence Creek because of the distance between the communities and the traffic on Route 54.She said county officials need to find a way to connect those communities, but "I'd hate for the solution to be what they did on West Broad Street -- 10 lanes wide, straight and fast."
David Maloney, Hanover's deputy planning director, said the area around the interchange is part of the county's suburban service area, which means it's designated to have public utilities in the future. Being in the service district also makes the area a target for growth.
He emphasized, however, that "the eastern edge of what would be East Ashland and the Providence Creek project really form the extent of development that we would expect along [Route] 54 in accordance with our . . . comprehensive plan."
George E. "Ed" Via III, vice chairman and Ashland District representative on the Hanover Board of Supervisors, said the town and the county are working together to make the East Ashland project, especially, fit into the vision of both jurisdictions.
"It's not going to be the same feeling that's in the existing town," Via said. He said county and town officials are working with the developer to create a town atmosphere, with a gridlike street pattern that resembles Ashland, rather then cul-de-sacs.
"I think it's going to come together well," he said.
Contact Holly Prestidge at (804) 649-6945 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Local governments approve mixed-use developments because of the concentration of tax dollars. The architectural eye-sore that is West Broad Village will bring in more tax dollars to the county per acre. That area of the county is running out of land so the county needs to squeeze every tax dollar they can out of the remaining acreage. You will see a lot more of this high-density development in the western part of Henrico.
FEBOOKER… you think all development is a bad idea.
Bad idea. Ashland is a historic landmark and should be left alone. Expanding it makes no sense unlese the only concern here is revenue.
Funny—West Broad Village is about half completed, but Jer1234 apparently has foresight for the ages so they can see it doesn’t work. Boy, what I wouldn’t give for that foresight. MX hasn’t proven to work in this area? Show me another mixed-use development that’s been around here long enough to have that proven one way or another! Mixed-use works all over America. Why wouldn’t it work here? What’s so special about Richmond? And would you prefer the urban sprawl continue? Because if you dump mixed use you’ll have more urban sprawl.
Developers provide what residents want. Residents for years have wanted cul-de-sacs. That’s why developers provide them. Take them away and you actually get MORE room for homes and more opportunity for profit. Where you get less homes with Timmy’s new regulations is that a builder is not going to build a home on a stub street, and the grid-pattern development encouraged by Timmy’s crap cuts down on space.
Local governments are screaming angry about the new regulations because the residents don’t want cars racing through their subdivisions using the shortcuts that connectivity will provide. But if the local governments want the state to take charge of the roads they will have no choice but to approve the connectivity. Timmy is basically holding the local governments hostage, saying do this or you’re on your own. All for the benefit of the Piedmont Enviroidiot Council.
You can still creatively build a suburban cookie cutter neighborhood without culdesacs while providing ways to inhibit cut through traffic…
Opinion8d - It is about the money… the fear is from developers because a restriction on culdesacs means LESS space for homes and in turn lesser developer profit (and) tax revenue.
The mixed-use concept DOES work (it’s worked for thousands of years) - we’ve just seen some pretty sorry attempts at it in our area recently.
Any body look at West Broad Village lately. Plenty of shops and places to live. No sale on most of the apartmetns that have been built. Traffic in that area is about maxed out and yet they build more. The mixed use concept is NOT working. People who work in these areas can not afford to live there. PERIOD. Most of the Business is stores and food establishments that pay minimum wage. Why do counties keep approving this type of development when the residents don’t want them and they have not proven to work in this area.
Well said James…and the fact that Ashland just likes to complain all the time.
Opinion8d… it’s not a fear of cul-de-sacs at East Ashland. I think they just want to build an old-time community with today’s principles of mixed use. I don’t know how that’s going to work.
With cul-de-sacs and what you’ve been reading about them, it’s all about Governor Timmy wanting to drive growth to the cities and turn Virginia into Europe, where everyone lives on top of everyone else and having a car is considered a crime against nature. Timmy and his Piedmont Enviroidiot Council bozos don’t believe a person should be able to have their acre of land if they want it. They want you living on the 23rd floor of some building so they can save the salamander, because the salamander is more important than you.
Cul-de-sacs are popular and keep people buying suburban homes, and to Timmy and his environitwit brethren that’s bad. Their thinking is get rid of cul-de-sacs and run traffic through subdivisions and you take away the attractions of suburban life. Then people will move, thus ending subdivision development. If they can shut down subdivision development everyone will have to move into the cramped quarters they treasure.
If we are dumb enough as a state to elect any of the Democrats running, this movement toward eliminating your chance to own your own piece of the American Dream will continue. They will steal your living privacy to make the environitwits happy.
What seems to be the problem with cul-de-sacs in the news latey? Are they trying to take away every SINGLE iota of potential privacy? It’s about money. That’s all. The fear is that cul-de-sacs take up too much space for too little tax revenue? Fine. My property values just went up. Thank you very much.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement