Virginia hopes to reopen rest stops
It's a long shot, but Virginia officials are hoping that they will be able to find a way to reopen 19 closed rest stops on the state's interstate highways in a couple of years.
The state is going to mothball until at least 2011 the 18 rest areas and one welcome center slated for closure and eventual demolition because of budget cutbacks.
"We want to wait till we exhaust all options on commercialization [of the rest areas] before we make the decision to get rid of all of them," said Jeff Caldwell, a spokesman for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
However, right now federal law prohibits the commercialization of rest areas along interstate highways, except for placing vending machines in rest stops, according to Cathy St. Denis, a Federal Highway Administration spokeswoman. Facilities established before 1960 are exceptions to the law.
The rest stops' primary service is free public toilets. They also provide a place for truckers to nap, tourists to pick up brochures for attractions, families to picnic, and dogs to relieve themselves.
Long-distance travelers stopping at the Ladysmith rest areas on Interstate 95 in Caroline County yesterday were dismayed at the coming closures.
"We use them a lot," said Sandra Jacobs from Hamilton, Ontario. She and her husband, Stan, and their two dogs stopped at Ladysmith on their way back to Canada after one of their frequent visits to their daughter in North Carolina.
"These are so much better than we have in Canada," Stan Jacobs said. "In Canada, you pretty much got to run to the bushes."
In the Richmond area, in addition to the Caroline rest stops, VDOT will close two areas on Interstate 64 in Goochland County and two on Interstate 85 in Dinwiddie County. The two stops on I-64 in New Kent County are among the 23 rest areas and welcome centers that will remain open.
VDOT will be putting the 19 closed stops into mothballs -- stripping out useful items, turning off utilities, draining the plumbing, boarding up the buildings, and putting up steel gates -- at an estimated cost of $570,000, Caldwell said.
The 18 rest areas are to be closed July 21 and the I-66 West Welcome Center at Manassas on Sept. 16.
The Commonwealth Transportation Board has cut the state's six-year transportation program by $2.6 billion to make up for recession-driven revenue shortfalls.
Closing the rest stops is part of the state Transportation Department's plan to make ends meet this year and should save about $8.6 million, officials said.
Putting the soon-to-be closed highway rest stops back in operation eventually "would be our hope," state Transportation Secretary Pierce R. Homer said yesterday. "But absent a change in federal law or an infusion of transportation funding, that's not likely."
The state's tourism industry wants to give it a try.
"We're hoping to keep that dialogue open with VDOT . . . to keep the rest areas open permanently," said Megan Svajda with the Virginia Hospitality and Travel Association.
The group hopes to find ways to help finance the state highway agency, she said, beyond the motor-fuels tax, transportation's chief revenue source in Virginia.
Though the General Assembly has failed to come up with a fix for the state's transportation woes three times in the past four years, "their ears are a little more open than in the past," Svajda said.
A powerful coalition of truck stops, fast-food restaurants, gas stations and the visually handicapped doing business at locations near interstate highway exits has blocked all earlier efforts in Congress to commercialize the rest areas.
"When the state is operating a business that is on the right of way, it really hurts the businesses at the [Interstate] exits," said Holly Alfano, vice president for government affairs with the National Association of Truck Stop Operators. "It's not a level playing field."
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine wants Congress to allow commercialization of rest stops, said his spokesman, Gordon Hickey, but he has ruled out taking money from other state functions to pay for keeping the travel facilities open.
"Transportation is a self-funded agency," Hickey said. The governor "is not going to take money from public safety and education and social services and put it into transportation."
"We obviously have communicated to local governments and private industry that we would be open and receptive to local or private funding" to keep the rest areas open, Homer said.
"No one stepped up."
Contact Peter Bacqué at (804) 649-6813 or .
Reader Reactions
General: For several years VDOT has been seeking add’l funding from the G/A, only to be rebuffed. In 2007, gas prices sky-rocketed to almost $4/gallon, and then spiraled back down in the fall. One suggestion floated during the spiral, was raising the State gas tax, which was last done about 1986. That went nowhere.
At about the same time that gas prices bottomed out, the economic impacts on the State were just being predicted and Gov. Kaine ordered the cutting of $2.5 billion in the FY 2010 portion of the 6-year Capital Transportation Budget funding.
Probably since 2009 was an election year (meaning some, if not all officials would be replaced), top transportation officials apparently made a decision to try to force the issue, and included, among other actions, the closing of the Rest Areas (predicted savings $12 million). The Va Tourism Corp (VTC), who is responsible for operating the Welcome Centers, was part of the discussions. VTC agreed to the Rest Area closings and gave up only the one, small Welcome Center on I-66, providing the rest of the Welcome Centers would essentially be spared. The proposal discussions never included boots-on-the-ground members of the Hospitality and Travel industry on any level.
Most likely, the opening ‘shot across the bow’ was the temporary closing of Welcome Centers 2 days a week last fall. This would clearly be a cost saving measure, but the public’s response would also provide an indication of what to expect on the Rest Area action. The result was that most people took the closings in stride, probably because a) the Welcome Centers were still open on weekends, and b) would resume their schedules when economic conditions improved.
Unlike prior years, when funding was requested of the G/A at the beginning of the Legislative Session, Trans officials decided to present their Rest Area closing schedule ultimatum at the very last week of the G/A’s session. Comm Trans Board (CTB) meetings would be held across the State for several months before a Final Vote at the CTB’s June meeting. Their stated desire at that time, was for “solutions”, but in reality it was additional funding but on their terms.
During the meetings, several suggestions were provided both in written form and direct testimony. To date few if any have had the courtesy of an acknowledgement much less a response.
VDOT’s plans were always to place concrete barricades and chain link at entrances, and to gut the closing Rest Areas of all working equipment including such items as soap dispensers, toilet paper holders and the like.
Then all the closed buildings would demolished
June ’09 CTB Meeting: At the June meeting CTB member James Davis made a last ditch effort to keep the Rest Areas open. Advised by Sect’y Homer that if $9 million more could be found, the Rest Areas would stay open, he researched CTB Financial Reports and found $120 million in a budgeted paving funds line item that clearly would not be spent by 30 June. Davis proposed an amendment to the full Board that would transfer $9 million from that line item to the Rest Areas. The voting result was a tie. Homer then broke the tie by voting no, killing the measure. When queried, in light of his earlier position, Homer advised that he would only approve ‘new’ funds, in spite of the fact that Budget transfers occur throughout the year, thereby giving the lie to their stated positions of ‘seeking solutions’.
To Date: On the early morning of Monday 6 July signs went up on the Interstates announcing the pending closings. The response went viral before noon and has continued unabated. VDOT is being inundated with responses both from in-state and beyond.
By Tuesday 7 July, Orders had been changed. No longer were the closing buildings to be gutted. Now the Order was given to only ‘winterize’ the buildings and lock them down. No concrete barricades would be used, only temporary ones.
Looming like the iceberg that sank the Titanic, however, is the 800 pound gorilla in the whole setting, and that is truck traffic safety, which is apparently being deliberately ignored. The long distance trucking industry, whose haulers are already mandated by the Feds to take periodic rests (computerized GPS systems make monitoring and reporting much easier), will have few choices available to them. At that point, effective 21 July, the rest of the travelers could have to consider themselves ‘targets’.
Additionally, the word is out that in VDOT’s end-of-year financial analyses, well over a billion dollars in revenues, above projections, could be realized.
Summary So Far: Early on, lame duck transportation officials seemed bent on teaching members of the G/A a lesson for not raising the Gas Tax or adding other revenues to their budget. Presumably, the Rest Areas will be closed, almost certainly through the election, thus accomplishing that end.
For the Interstate travelers, truckers and users alike, however, they will only be left with prayer
There are two main reasons VDOT no longer has the money it needs to perform vital services:
1. The General Assembly
First, when the times were good and the economy was booming, the General Assembly thought nothing of “borrowing” money from the Transportation Trust Fund to fund pet projects (read: pork) in their districts. But they never paid back the money they borrowed. Second, they have stripped VDOT to the bone and required it to outsource more and more crucial vital services, like Interstate Maintenance. This includes routine services that VDOT has been performing for 100 years. But, the General Assembly thinks it can be done cheaper if outsources. But how? A private company, performing the exact same services as VDOT, has to (a) make a profit; (b) pay taxes on that profit; (c) give annual raises to their employees (or at least it says they will in the contract)—if the budget is tight, VDOT employees, indeed, ALL state employees have FREQUENTLY gone SEVERAL years without raises; and, last, but perhaps most importantly, (d) give hefty campaign contributions to members of the General Assembly. Those are four costs that VDOT does not have to pay when performing the exact same services. Some may argue that by outsourcing, VDOT saves money on “seasonal” labor. To a degree, that may be true, but when VDOT was performing vital services itself, the employees who mowed the highways in the summer would be the same ones plowing snow in the winter. Employees are capable of multitasking.
2. The Gas Tax
The gas tax was last increased in 1986. What costs the same today as it did in 1986? A loaf of bread? A gallon of milk? A car? Virginia’s gas tax is currently $0.175 cents per gallon. When adjusted for inflation, $0.175 in 1986 will buy approximately $0.09 today. VDOT’s “buying power” has essentially been cut in half, but they have taken significantly more lane miles of highway into the state system in the last 22 years, meaning significantly more roads to maintain. People who complain about “taxes” usually champion “user fees” as the way to pay for things. But, the gas tax is the ultimate user fee… the more miles you drive, the more gas you need, thus the more you pay to maintain the road over those miles; the heavier your vehicle, the more damage you do to the roads and the lower your gas mileage; thus the more you pay to maintain the roads you damage. With as much as gas prices fluctuate, would anyone really feel a $0.10 increase in the gas tax after it was initially imposed? Oil companies and speculators cause gas prices to fluctuate $0.10 per WEEK. Wouldn’t it feel better to know that a ONE TIME fluctuation would go to build and maintain better roads on which you and your family travel?
This isn’t even mentioning that cars achieve significantly better fuel economy today than they did in 1986. A car in 1986 may have needed one gallon of gas to go 15 miles. Today, a car can easily go twice that distance on a single gallon. People don’t need to buy as much gas, or refuel as often, so… yet another way VDOT’s “buying power” from the 1986 gas tax has been decreased.
Kaine’s “dog catcher” has let the cat out of the bag: “"Transportation is a self-funded agency,“ Hickey said. The governor “is not going to take money from public safety and education and social services and put it into transportation.“ Nevermind that it has been perfectly OK with Kaine, his predecessors, and the General Assembly to divert money intended for transportation to other purposes in previous years. Notice, too, Kaine’s “mouthpiece” very conveniently chose “public safety”, “education”, and “social services” - highly emotional, hot button issues all - as if they are the only areas from which money could possibly be diverted if Kaine were willing to be reasonable. Kaine and Hickey know full well that there are other areas in the state budget in which money has been allocated for far less crucial services that could be reallocated, but they persist in trying to convince the public that money could come only from those areas which they know will elicit the most visceral, emotionally-charged reactions.
Kaine and Hickey: apparently it has escaped your attention - deliberately - that the rest stops are a crucial component of public safety on the highways: a fact you conveniently choose to ignore. It would be entirely appropriate for a reasonable, caring administration to use public safety funds to continue vital public safety services.
Chairman Kaine, in dire economic circumstances, will not even consider using money allocated for less crucial functions to continue the operation of rest stops crucial to motorist safety and comfort. This demonstrates, as I’ve suspected all along, that Kaine is so focused on his own selfish personal and partisan interests that he is obviously very willing to place motorist safety at risk hoping that inflicting inconvenience and danger on the public will cause Virginia votes to rise up “en masse” and demand the tax increases he so badly wants. He using the same “punish-the-citizen” tactics as his predecessor Mark Warner used in unwisely closing DMV facilities - and they should both be ashamed.
The sooner this partisan hypocrite is out of Virginia, the better. And he should be strongly encouraged never to return - for any reason.
The General Assembly - if it had any true leadership from any source - would be demanding to be reconvened to reallocate money from less crucial items to continue the operation of all the rest stops. Unfortunately, as both houses have demonstrated for the last several sessions, they lack both the leadership, courage, and moral compass to do what is in the best interest of the Commonwealth rather than attempting to ensure their respective re-elections “ad infinitum”.
I was wondering why Va. doesn’t just lease these rest areas out to McD’s or Exxon? They could charge a long term lease as well as have them clean it up. If there is already a deceleration and acceleration lane there shouldn’t be a problem doing this. The people on these roads look forward to taking a break and using the bathroom. Adding a McD’s or something would make the state money instead of cost. As it stands the land is going to sit there and do nothing anyway.
I don’t know if you noticed or not, it will cost an estimated $570,000, just to shut them down!!
It seems that it’s costing almost as much to close down as it is to keep open! “The state is going to mothball until at least 2011 the 18 rest areas and one welcome center slated for closure and eventual demolition because of budget cutbacks.“ If they are talking about demolishing them, then they will never reopen. When or if they demolish it, it will cost 4 times as much to rebuild—stupid thinking.
“It’s a long shot, but Virginia officials are hoping that they will be able to find a way to reopen 19 closed rest stops on the state’s interstate highways in a couple of years.“ Who are they kidding? Don’t bet on it. They will NEVER reopen these rest stops once they are closed. If they do, it will cost twice as much to reopen, then they will say it’s too expensive to reopen.
That is why I feel closing these stops is so dumb. Good bye to your Va. tourism dollars. “Virginia is NOT for lovers anymore.“
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement