City to seek proposals for Shockoe revitalization

» 15 Comments | Post a Comment

With a ballpark out of the picture, Richmond Mayor Dwight C. Jones wants a new, market-tested plan for revitalizing Shockoe Bottom.

The city was preparing to issue yesterday a request for proposals for an economic strategy to guide development and redevelopment of city and private property in the Bottom.

"At the end of the day, we want something that's implementable and market-driven," said Peter H. Chapman, deputy chief administrative officer for economic and community development.

Among other things, the project's scope of work calls for a site plan, a market assessment of development issues, and opportunities and implementation strategies that would include "destination-anchor projects," reuse and redevelopment of property, expansion of retail, "market-rate and mixed-income residences," tourism, and public and private financing.

The summary stresses the city's interest in consultants with experience revitalizing historic downtown areas and "communities with a strong, yet unrealized potential for transit-oriented development." Shockoe Bottom's Main Street Station has been identified as part of a possible extension of high-speed rail.

"The high and increasing volume of foot, bicycle, auto and rail traffic make it important to improve the image of Broad Street and the surrounding area," the scope of work reads. "The blocks between Interstate 95 and 21st Street present opportunities to establish a front door on Broad Street for Shockoe Bottom and Main Street Station and to provide gateways to Church Hill," VCU Medical Center, the central business district and the Capitol.

The project is to be funded with $125,000 set aside by the City Council this spring. At the time, council members saw a need to review various plans for the Bottom, including the now-withdrawn Shockoe Center ballpark development proposal, a possible slavery museum, and the use of Main Street Station for the extension of high-speed rail and a bus-transfer center.

City Councilwoman Ellen F. Robertson, whose 6th District includes the Bottom, is kicking off a discussion about the Bottom's future at a constituents' meeting scheduled for 10 a.m. tomorrow at The Old City Bar, 1548 E. Main St.

The city should not pursue any plan for development in the Bottom without recognizing the challenges presented by having much of the area within a floodplain, said David Napier, president of the Shockoe Bottom Neighborhood Association and owner of The Old City Bar. As a result, any new buildings must be required to have public access provided above the 100-year flood level, he said.

"Any study of what should be done down here should include what can be done down here in the floodplain," Napier said. "It's really a waste of taxpayer money to not start with the premise of what you can and can't do down here."

Chapman said he expects the plan to address the flood-plain issue, as well as to respect the Negro Burial Ground and other slave-heritage sites.

The city expects consultants to be hired by late October or early November and for a report to be submitted in the first or second quarter of 2010.

The idea is for the plan to lead directly to another request for proposals for specific development. A similar request by then-Mayor L. Douglas Wilder's administration produced the proposal for Shockoe Center. The ballpark-anchored project was announced last October and abandoned in June after failing to gain traction with the Jones administration.

Napier said the Bottom has limped along since the neighborhood was flooded by the remnants of Tropical Storm Gaston in 2004. He said the lack of a city plan for the area is one reason his restaurant is open for only private gatherings and he has shelved plans to open a brewery as part of the Atrium Lofts at Cold Storage in the former Richmond Cold Storage warehouses.

"I'm better reducing my exposure rather than increasing it," he said.



Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: shockoe center,shockoe bottom,mayor,ellen robertson,dwight jones,david napier,city of richmond,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Glen Allen on September 11, 2009 at 7:29 pm

What is wrong with the Bottom, the way it is now? Why do we insist on starting a new project when there are so many other areas of town that can, and should be revitalized? How many times, and in how many ways, must the tax payers tell the City Administrators that we do not want to spend money down there. Why not put a City-wide vote on the thing and put it to rest before the administrators spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on more useless studies for a project we do not want, or need.

Flag Comment Posted by tripower on September 11, 2009 at 4:28 pm

If a Major Trauma Center isn’t a “destination-anchor project” I don’t know what is. Can we please stop spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on worthless studies that DO NOTHING but enrich the consultants who generate these worthless studies. If private developers want to build in Shokoe Bottom it is the city’s job to get out of the way and let them build.

Flag Comment Posted by squier13 on September 11, 2009 at 1:48 pm

I really don’t see what makes this four block area worthy of hundreds of thousands in studies and plans while we have block after block of ready-to-go commercial space sitting idle in the city core. Let’s come up with a plan to rehabilitate the existing commercial areas.

Flag Comment Posted by Guesswho on September 11, 2009 at 1:42 pm

Why does the mayor keep focusing on a area in Richmond that has nothing to offer but headaches.  Sad . . he is going to waste more taxpayer money paying consultants that will come up with nothing and if they do, who is going to pay for the flood insurance (which has to be purchased through the government).  Let it go… focus on other areas, oh thats right,there are none!!

Flag Comment Posted by Pat B on September 11, 2009 at 11:32 am

If only the city had the millions of dollars that have been wasted on plans A thru Z.  The they could afford to do something concrete, so plan to do nothing because that’s the end result anyway and look at the money that will be saved.

Flag Comment Posted by Really? on September 11, 2009 at 11:04 am

It is really easy to develop in a flood plain like this. Just put parking on the lower levels and put the residences, offices, or other main users above the parking. If there is any retail on the first floor then require them to get flood insurance.

The only reason this still continues to have the chance for flooding is that the city didn’t properly operate and keep up the drainage system. Gaston was a 500 year flood. You wan’t see another like it in any of our lifetimes unless the city allows the drainage to be blocked again.

As for the block of Grace, I believe there have been some stories recently about the city taking action against one of the major owners of those buildings. The city can only do so much to make someone upgrade their property if it meets code, unless they buy it and sell it to someone who will develop it, but that eminent domain law will stop that form happening now too.

Oneuser, As for developing sout of the river. In case you missed it there is a flood wall over there too. Guess that means we should bulldoze everything over there too. Also, by that reasoning nothing else should be built along the canal walk b/c that could flood too.

Flag Comment Posted by Question Govt on September 11, 2009 at 10:17 am

Any successful development in the area will require (a) developers with a realistic, reasoned and well-thought-out business plan who are willing and fully able to provide their own financing, and (b) those developers must fully acknowledge that much of the area is subject to flooding and accept the risk for what it is. There is no fool-proof solution to the fact that the area is subject to flooding and no feasible way to guarantee that it will not in the future.

Flag Comment Posted by revnhoj on September 11, 2009 at 10:03 am

The best feature of Richmond BY FAR is the James River and it’s park. It’s practically the only thing which makes this place worth visiting and living here.

We should expand the park by bulldozing the bottom and return it to it’s natural, flood resilient state, and make some fantastic trails, open air markets and natural grass playing fields.  Now that’d be a place I’d actually go to see a game.

It’s that or set ourselves up for even more silly lawsuits by people who insist on building in a flood plain.

Flag Comment Posted by loggerhead on September 11, 2009 at 9:54 am

this is precisely why the business owners may win their lawsuit.  The city wants businesses down there and does not do anything to prevent “rising” issues, due to their neglect.  Mayor Jones did not help their defense with this press release.

Flag Comment Posted by squier13 on September 11, 2009 at 9:48 am

The best use for the area in question is to leave it available for future transportation expansion.  We’re going to need all of the Main St station property for rail service, that is certain.  The GRTC transit hub should be built in the adjacent lot at the corner of 17th and E Broad.  This will be much easier and cheaper to do than putting it up in the old train shed, and will make bus routing way easier.  In subsequent flood events this infrastructure will be far less vulnerable to damage.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement