Shockoe Bottom considered for slavery museum

Shockoe Bottom considered for slavery museum

P. KEVIN MORLEY/TIMES-DISPATCH

Richmond officials are looking at Shockoe Bottom as a possible site for the U.S. National Slavery Museum if it doesn’t end up in Fredericksburg.

 

Related Info

U.S. National Slavery Museum timeline



May 27, 1993: In an address to the second African-African-American Conference in Gabon, Gov. L. Douglas Wilder pledges to build a national American museum and memorial at Jamestown to honor Africans who were enslaved and who died on the way to the Americas. The project, inspired by his visit to the infamous slave house on Goree Island, is to be financed with private funds.

April 2001: Wilder says four sites—at Jamestown, Hampton, Fredericksburg and Richmond—are under consideration for the museum.

Aug 15, 2001: The Fredericksburg City Council pledges $1 million toward the museum in Fredericksburg. The motion calls for the Silver Cos., developer of the site, to repay the city the $1 million plus interest through a special tax to be levied on the development. The Silver Cos. say it would donate 20 to 25 acres valued at $10 million to $12 million for the museum.

Oct. 6, 2001: Richmond officials announce they will offer a 22-acre site near the James River Canal for the museum that would cost Richmond $4 million to $5 million. The cost includes the land value and expenses for preparing the site, near the docks of the riverboat Annabel Lee.

Oct. 8, 2001: Wilder announces that Fredericksburg will be the site of the museum on a 22-acre parcel along the Rappahannock River. The cost was estimated at $100 million to $200 million. Wilder cited disorganization in Richmond’s proposals as influencing his decision.

December 2004: Crews begin clearing land for construction of the three-level, 250,000-squarefoot U.S. National Slavery Museum.

June 9, 2005: Officials with the museum push back the opening date until October 2007.

Sept. 22, 2006: The museum asks each American to donate $8 toward building the facility.

June 21, 2007: The planned museum opens its Spirit of Freedom Exhibit Garden, which features a “Hallelujah” sculpture and is designed to let visitors experience the quest for freedom through a slave’s eyes.

March 2008: Fredericksburg tourism officials acknowledge that they have scaled back promoting the museum in marketing materials because of uncertainties about the project.

Compiled by Jennifer Perilli

» 47 Comments | Post a Comment

If former Richmond Mayor L. Douglas Wilder's slavery museum is being abandoned in Fredericksburg, some Richmond officials say it's time to talk about the project -- or something like it -- for Shockoe Bottom.

"I really feel, that from the very beginning, it should have been in Richmond" because of the city's role in the slave trade, said Del. Delores L. McQuinn, D-Richmond.

McQuinn, a former member of the Richmond City Council, and City Councilwoman Ellen F. Robertson said they want to talk to Mayor Dwight C. Jones about approaching Wilder to see if his U.S. National Slavery Museum might find a home in Shockoe Bottom in light of signs that the project may have shut down in Fredericksburg.

The Main Street Station train shed and nearby Seaboard Building could be used until a permanent museum is built, McQuinn said.

"It's not something that he's considered, and it's not something that's been brought to him," said Jones' press secretary, Tammy D. Hawley.

Wilder has not returned calls in recent days, and there's no indication what his plans for the long-sputtering museum may be.

The nonprofit museum, selected for Fredericksburg in 2001 over sites in Richmond and at Hampton University, has not paid a $24,093 real estate tax bill that was due Nov. 15 for its 38-acre property on the Rappahannock River.

The museum's phone system is set for outgoing calls only. Messages left yesterday with its Washington-based public-relations firm weren't returned.

Lawrence A. Davies, a member of the museum's board of directors and a longtime friend of Wilder, said he has no idea where the project stands.

Davies, a Baptist minister and former mayor of Fredericksburg, said it's unusual for him to have not heard from Wilder for so long: "I can only hope he will surface in some form soon."

. . .

The buzz about the museum comes about two months after remains of the Lumpkin's Slave Jail were unearthed in a parking lot in Shockoe Bottom and as Richmond officials face major decisions about the area's future.

Highwoods Properties has proposed a minor-league baseball stadium as part of Shockoe Center, a $363 million development that would include shops, offices, hotels and residences.

The proposal calls for retail on the first floor of the Main Street Station train shed.

On the building's second floor, GRTC Transit System is planning an open-air downtown bus-transfer center, a project designed to reduce bus traffic on Broad Street and in downtown. Long term, the center also would support regional efforts, including light rail, said John M. Lewis Jr., chief executive officer of GRTC.

With preliminary designs complete, the $70 million transfer center is at "a very important crossroads" for approval and is being positioned for funding through the federal stimulus package, Lewis said.

The city hasn't yet approved the project, but Jones supports the idea, as well as preservation of the Lumpkin's site, Hawley said.

However, City Councilman Bruce W. Tyler said he believes the transfer center should go elsewhere, in part to allow for proper commemoration of Shockoe Bottom's role in the slave trade.

The Lumpkin jail, owned by Robert Lumpkin, held slaves from 1840 until the end of the Civil War, a period when Richmond served as the nation's largest domestic slave market.

Tyler argues that the transfer center would be too expensive and fears that its ramps could end up isolating the 12,000-square-foot archaeological site from the rest of Shockoe Bottom.

"I believe it's time for Richmond to enter into a serious discussion about developing a heritage center, where Lumpkin's jail is a key component," he said. "We have to decide what's more important" -- a transfer center or the area's history.

McQuinn, who leads the Richmond Slave Trail Commission, said she has some concerns about the transfer center but said it's worth seeing how it might be fashioned with the slave-jail site and a potential museum.

"Somebody's going to have to begin the discussion so there can be some decisions made," she said.

Lewis defended the transfer center as a sound investment and a good use for the historic train shed. An initial environment assessment submitted to federal authorities shows the project won't have an adverse impact on the slave-jail site, he said.

"I don't know what the needs are for the museum," Lewis said. "I think it's a great concept. What happens on the first floor is entirely up to the city. We're only taking up the second floor."

The developers for Shockoe Center said they haven't been in contact with Wilder but are interested in talking.

"I think we would be receptive to discussions with the National Slavery Museum and people associated with them," said Ralph L. Axselle Jr., an attorney for the developers. "Richmond is, in many respects one of the most appropriate places to memorialize and honor one of the most difficult periods of our history."



Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or .

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Nibbles on February 27, 2009 at 3:48 pm

JCHuff - I’m not from Richmond, I’ve lived here for 13 years, the rest of my family a few years longer.  Your question is interesting and relevant.  Does article provide any information in answert to your question?
http://defendersfje.tripod.com/id33.html


David - I don’t believe anyone owns rights to slavery.  I think former Govenor Wilder is probably a good person to champion the cause for both a local museum and a national museum honoring those people who under subjugation and forced labor played an important in building this nation and then carried it forward to defending people’s inalienable rights and liberties. They did this often times under duress and at a cost of their own lives, with little thanks or remuneration.

Flag Comment Posted by David on February 27, 2009 at 3:33 pm

If I have this straight, Mrs. McQuinn and Mrs. Robertson want Mayor Jones to approach former Mayor Wilder and ask for permission for a museum in Richmond.  Does Wilder own the rights to slavery in America.
  Slavery is an important part of a our national history.  It defined our country from 1619 to 1865, and influenced it until today.  But it is not a Richmond history or a Virginia history.  This museum needs to be on the Mall in Washington, near the Holcaust museum and the Museum of the American Indian.

Flag Comment Posted by jchuff77 on February 27, 2009 at 1:56 pm

I think a slave museum is a great idea.  It really could do a lot to commemorate both African and slave culture and their roles in forging the US.  I do have a question though.  Does anyone know exactly where they uncovered the old jail site in the Bottom.  I think the exact location of the jail would be a great area to place the musuem, but if its not a suitable spot, other options should be considered.  A museum of this importance deserves a great location

Flag Comment Posted by kct08 on February 27, 2009 at 12:42 pm

plm68:

It seems as if you have a personal problem with the black Richmonders. I hope this is not the case, but you seem very angry.

In no way would I care to shove my history in your face. If you are an American it is a part of you.

You have a very narrow minded view of black Richmonders. You extend your invitation to ‘come join’ you, but you must not see that I’m already here. You push this idea that all black Richmonders have segregated themselves and ask for ‘sop’ (slop?)? That’s simply ridiculous. A Slavery Museum would not ‘make me happy.‘

As far as your Irish heritage… I would love to know more about it; I’m also the descendant of Scots-surname McBride. You, personally, may not want to rejoice in your heritage, but I know many of all heritages who would like to share. Where is the problem in teaching and learning?

Flag Comment Posted by kct08 on February 27, 2009 at 12:30 pm

I must clarify for those who did not read into my previous message. By capitalizing and saying OUR I meant Virginians as well as Americans, not black nor white.

OUR encompasses all of us. It is ALL our history.

Flag Comment Posted by Nibbles on February 27, 2009 at 11:59 am

I believe a Slavery Museum is a good idea.  It would certainly be educational and help preseve history and an historical part of this town.  Both ‘dc’ and ‘avm’ have both shared some insight in this regard. 

Many slaves, former slaves and their progeny had a great hand in building this nation and contributing to its fruition.  A museum would do them justice in recognizing their roots in this nation, their struggle for individual freedom, and their heroic bravery in the face of adversity.

To the statement made by avm, “Prior to the War, the racism in the South was ‘paternalistic’ in nature.“  In a different context racism is paternalistic in nature even in this day and age, in that one’s ideals and values are often founded in those of one’s parents as well as those of one’s peers.

I still believe that slavery and the concept of owning a person as property is exploitation and amounts to social and moral deviance based fundamentally on greed rationalized as necessity. It is oppression plain and simple.  Slavery is an issue this country struggled with during it’s inception.  An issue over which a bloody and divisive war was fought, albeit indirectly as slavery was a matter of economy and capital 150 years ago and many years prior.  The subsequent repercussions of which we continue struggling with today for whatever reason. 

If you compare the US with other nations that have undergone what amounts to sedition and treason, the ‘South’ got off pretty lucky.  Many other places have experienced far greater mass genocide and brutality in the aftermath of civil war and insurrection.

As to racism, doesn’t that simply equate to fear?

Flag Comment Posted by Randy on February 27, 2009 at 11:06 am

dc, I respect your opinion and your wish to use tax dollars to build the Slave Museum.

I have a better idea, though. Instead of using dollars coerced from the public, why not take you private money, pool it with other individuals of a like mind and get the job done? Why must I and other folks who are indifferent about a slavery museum be compelled to pay for it with my tax dollars?

Flag Comment Posted by dc on February 27, 2009 at 10:33 am

The slavery museum should be in Richmond. Shockoe Bottom is the perfect place for it. The proposed ballpark, proposed slavery museum and proposed bus depot could ALL work together well and would compliment one another very nicely. This combined project is one that I would feel good seeing my tax dollars pay for. More should be done to properly delineate the location of the Old Negro Burial Ground, across Broad Street, as well. This area is very rich in Black History and could, very well, be a huge drawing card for tourism. The concept seems like a win, win, win, win for all of us.

Flag Comment Posted by real virginian on February 26, 2009 at 11:25 pm

kct08- I agree with most of your comment. However, just to clarify, when you share share OUR history, I only hope that OUR history is defined as American history, not black/African American history.

As a white man, I consider slavery as much part of my history and heritage as it is a part of anyone else’s heritage. Regardless of race, we ALL still suffer. I’m a Christian yet when I visited the Holocaust Museum in DC, I still cried. I’m not Jewish so why did I cry? Because I am a human. There is still hate in this world and sadly, there will likely always be hate. But please don’t narrowly define “OUR” history. Don’t assume the tears of descendants of slave owners are any less painful than the tears of the descendants of slaves. We all suffer.

Flag Comment Posted by Randy on February 26, 2009 at 6:23 pm

Duane - # 6 might annoy them, but, if they’re mute, you don’t have to listen to the griping.

By the way, I just saw the movie Taken. The lesson is: When Dad says “no”, listen to him.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement