Shockoe Bottom considered for slavery museum
P. KEVIN MORLEY/TIMES-DISPATCH
Richmond officials are looking at Shockoe Bottom as a possible site for the U.S. National Slavery Museum if it doesn’t end up in Fredericksburg.
Related Info
U.S. National Slavery Museum timeline
May 27, 1993: In an address to the second African-African-American Conference in Gabon, Gov. L. Douglas Wilder pledges to build a national American museum and memorial at Jamestown to honor Africans who were enslaved and who died on the way to the Americas. The project, inspired by his visit to the infamous slave house on Goree Island, is to be financed with private funds.
April 2001: Wilder says four sites—at Jamestown, Hampton, Fredericksburg and Richmond—are under consideration for the museum.
Aug 15, 2001: The Fredericksburg City Council pledges $1 million toward the museum in Fredericksburg. The motion calls for the Silver Cos., developer of the site, to repay the city the $1 million plus interest through a special tax to be levied on the development. The Silver Cos. say it would donate 20 to 25 acres valued at $10 million to $12 million for the museum.
Oct. 6, 2001: Richmond officials announce they will offer a 22-acre site near the James River Canal for the museum that would cost Richmond $4 million to $5 million. The cost includes the land value and expenses for preparing the site, near the docks of the riverboat Annabel Lee.
Oct. 8, 2001: Wilder announces that Fredericksburg will be the site of the museum on a 22-acre parcel along the Rappahannock River. The cost was estimated at $100 million to $200 million. Wilder cited disorganization in Richmond’s proposals as influencing his decision.
December 2004: Crews begin clearing land for construction of the three-level, 250,000-squarefoot U.S. National Slavery Museum.
June 9, 2005: Officials with the museum push back the opening date until October 2007.
Sept. 22, 2006: The museum asks each American to donate $8 toward building the facility.
June 21, 2007: The planned museum opens its Spirit of Freedom Exhibit Garden, which features a “Hallelujah” sculpture and is designed to let visitors experience the quest for freedom through a slave’s eyes.
March 2008: Fredericksburg tourism officials acknowledge that they have scaled back promoting the museum in marketing materials because of uncertainties about the project.
Compiled by Jennifer Perilli
If former Richmond Mayor L. Douglas Wilder's slavery museum is being abandoned in Fredericksburg, some Richmond officials say it's time to talk about the project -- or something like it -- for Shockoe Bottom.
"I really feel, that from the very beginning, it should have been in Richmond" because of the city's role in the slave trade, said Del. Delores L. McQuinn, D-Richmond.
McQuinn, a former member of the Richmond City Council, and City Councilwoman Ellen F. Robertson said they want to talk to Mayor Dwight C. Jones about approaching Wilder to see if his U.S. National Slavery Museum might find a home in Shockoe Bottom in light of signs that the project may have shut down in Fredericksburg.
The Main Street Station train shed and nearby Seaboard Building could be used until a permanent museum is built, McQuinn said.
"It's not something that he's considered, and it's not something that's been brought to him," said Jones' press secretary, Tammy D. Hawley.
Wilder has not returned calls in recent days, and there's no indication what his plans for the long-sputtering museum may be.
The nonprofit museum, selected for Fredericksburg in 2001 over sites in Richmond and at Hampton University, has not paid a $24,093 real estate tax bill that was due Nov. 15 for its 38-acre property on the Rappahannock River.
The museum's phone system is set for outgoing calls only. Messages left yesterday with its Washington-based public-relations firm weren't returned.
Lawrence A. Davies, a member of the museum's board of directors and a longtime friend of Wilder, said he has no idea where the project stands.
Davies, a Baptist minister and former mayor of Fredericksburg, said it's unusual for him to have not heard from Wilder for so long: "I can only hope he will surface in some form soon."
. . .
The buzz about the museum comes about two months after remains of the Lumpkin's Slave Jail were unearthed in a parking lot in Shockoe Bottom and as Richmond officials face major decisions about the area's future.
Highwoods Properties has proposed a minor-league baseball stadium as part of Shockoe Center, a $363 million development that would include shops, offices, hotels and residences.
The proposal calls for retail on the first floor of the Main Street Station train shed.
On the building's second floor, GRTC Transit System is planning an open-air downtown bus-transfer center, a project designed to reduce bus traffic on Broad Street and in downtown. Long term, the center also would support regional efforts, including light rail, said John M. Lewis Jr., chief executive officer of GRTC.
With preliminary designs complete, the $70 million transfer center is at "a very important crossroads" for approval and is being positioned for funding through the federal stimulus package, Lewis said.
The city hasn't yet approved the project, but Jones supports the idea, as well as preservation of the Lumpkin's site, Hawley said.
However, City Councilman Bruce W. Tyler said he believes the transfer center should go elsewhere, in part to allow for proper commemoration of Shockoe Bottom's role in the slave trade.
The Lumpkin jail, owned by Robert Lumpkin, held slaves from 1840 until the end of the Civil War, a period when Richmond served as the nation's largest domestic slave market.
Tyler argues that the transfer center would be too expensive and fears that its ramps could end up isolating the 12,000-square-foot archaeological site from the rest of Shockoe Bottom.
"I believe it's time for Richmond to enter into a serious discussion about developing a heritage center, where Lumpkin's jail is a key component," he said. "We have to decide what's more important" -- a transfer center or the area's history.
McQuinn, who leads the Richmond Slave Trail Commission, said she has some concerns about the transfer center but said it's worth seeing how it might be fashioned with the slave-jail site and a potential museum.
"Somebody's going to have to begin the discussion so there can be some decisions made," she said.
Lewis defended the transfer center as a sound investment and a good use for the historic train shed. An initial environment assessment submitted to federal authorities shows the project won't have an adverse impact on the slave-jail site, he said.
"I don't know what the needs are for the museum," Lewis said. "I think it's a great concept. What happens on the first floor is entirely up to the city. We're only taking up the second floor."
The developers for Shockoe Center said they haven't been in contact with Wilder but are interested in talking.
"I think we would be receptive to discussions with the National Slavery Museum and people associated with them," said Ralph L. Axselle Jr., an attorney for the developers. "Richmond is, in many respects one of the most appropriate places to memorialize and honor one of the most difficult periods of our history."
Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
We have already addressed this here in Richmond. It is called the National Civil War Musuem. Make it part of that. http://www.tredegar.org/index.htm?gclid=CI6YjtSU-5gCFQwDGgodlFKjlw
Actually if you merged all 6 of those museums, I have a feeling that would make for one big profitable museum. Why has no one proposed this for Richmond?
way to go Randy, you have just annoyed women with #6 of your top 6 list!
Touché, Randy
1 Twenty 13. Here’s a few museums that could probably sustain themselves with memberships and donations:
1. The Beer Museum.
2. The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.
3. The Beautiful Women’s Museum.
4. The Swedish Massage Museum.
5. The Lazee Boy Recliner and HD TV museum.
6. The Mute Wife Museum.
Just thinkin’ out loud.
I’m probably opening another can of worms here, but I can see museums in general going the way of print newspapers. Why pay to go to a museum to learn things when you can look it up on the internet for free? Just like why pay for a newspaper subscription when you can get the news from a free website?
Anyone ever known of a museum that can support itself on membership or admission fees alone?
I have no problem with the concept of a slavery museum in Shockoe Bottom. Slavery is a historical fact and there is an important archaeological site down there (Lumpkin’s Jail, big slave market, slave cemetery). But let’s face it, private money is hard to come by for enterprises that commemorate black history. Look how the Black History Museum in Richmond limps along, and how Wilder’s project is in limbo. There are many other examples. If there is going to be a museum, it has to be national in scope and it has to have broad-based fundraising. We don’t need a poorly attended, poorly marketed, shabby enterprise that ends up being reliant on local government funding to operate. The project also needs a deadline; the concept can’t be allowed to forestall other development for years and then come to naught. Richmond has a history of that as well—see Leigh Street Armory.
Randy- I was not directing my thoughts towards those who simply do not want to spend more of their tax dollars on a museum.
More so my words were for the posters bickering about the slavery museum itself and not the funding behind its creation. I have no problem with your objections about expense, but I do have a problem with the contempt occuring SOLELY because it’s for a slavery museum.
The history of slavery is one that is known… some people are quoting fact, others fiction.
Even though my post wasn’t initially directed at you and your monetary restraints that oppose the slavery museum, I believe it should come from the taxpayers just as other historical sites have been created with OUR money. With that said I do believe fiscally it is the wrong time.
kct08 - I do not have any bones or disdain for a slavery museum, I just want it funded privately, that’s all. Tax dollars have no place, particularly in this economy, funding a museum.
Everyone knows that slavery is everyone’s fault from the eastern african traders who captured western africans and sold them to the white slave traders. EVERY race had some skin in that game - no pun intended, so, I have no problem with the facts being posted for the purposes of posterity - it’s just that the producers of society are being asked to subsidize more and more of the non-producers of society, consequently, a slave museum at the expense of tax payers is asking a little too much. Do it with private funds - easy enough.
Can I summarize here?
1. Nobody is trying to deny slavery or even wipe it from the history books.
2. The history of slavery in the United States draws a niche audience when you take out children who are on field trips.
3. The public schools teach history and include slavery and there’s 28 straight days of Black Achievement Month in February (it’s not exactly Black History month because they tell you what blacks have accomplished without being more comprehensive about what they’ve done wrong).
4. Barack Obama’s ancestors from Kenya, sold western Africans into slavery to white traders. Why isn’t this being discussed especially in the context of “slave blood lines”? What a great opportunity for an official apology from the president for slavery, eh?
3. Tax dollars should not be used to build a slavery museum. Most Afro-Centric tax payer funded endeavors die a slow painful, incompetent, inefficient death if left to their own devices to raise and sustain a program. Sorry, I’m not interested in another inefficient use of tax payer dollars.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement