Shockoe Bottom considered for slavery museum

Shockoe Bottom considered for slavery museum

P. KEVIN MORLEY/TIMES-DISPATCH

Richmond officials are looking at Shockoe Bottom as a possible site for the U.S. National Slavery Museum if it doesn’t end up in Fredericksburg.

 

Related Info

U.S. National Slavery Museum timeline



May 27, 1993: In an address to the second African-African-American Conference in Gabon, Gov. L. Douglas Wilder pledges to build a national American museum and memorial at Jamestown to honor Africans who were enslaved and who died on the way to the Americas. The project, inspired by his visit to the infamous slave house on Goree Island, is to be financed with private funds.

April 2001: Wilder says four sites—at Jamestown, Hampton, Fredericksburg and Richmond—are under consideration for the museum.

Aug 15, 2001: The Fredericksburg City Council pledges $1 million toward the museum in Fredericksburg. The motion calls for the Silver Cos., developer of the site, to repay the city the $1 million plus interest through a special tax to be levied on the development. The Silver Cos. say it would donate 20 to 25 acres valued at $10 million to $12 million for the museum.

Oct. 6, 2001: Richmond officials announce they will offer a 22-acre site near the James River Canal for the museum that would cost Richmond $4 million to $5 million. The cost includes the land value and expenses for preparing the site, near the docks of the riverboat Annabel Lee.

Oct. 8, 2001: Wilder announces that Fredericksburg will be the site of the museum on a 22-acre parcel along the Rappahannock River. The cost was estimated at $100 million to $200 million. Wilder cited disorganization in Richmond’s proposals as influencing his decision.

December 2004: Crews begin clearing land for construction of the three-level, 250,000-squarefoot U.S. National Slavery Museum.

June 9, 2005: Officials with the museum push back the opening date until October 2007.

Sept. 22, 2006: The museum asks each American to donate $8 toward building the facility.

June 21, 2007: The planned museum opens its Spirit of Freedom Exhibit Garden, which features a “Hallelujah” sculpture and is designed to let visitors experience the quest for freedom through a slave’s eyes.

March 2008: Fredericksburg tourism officials acknowledge that they have scaled back promoting the museum in marketing materials because of uncertainties about the project.

Compiled by Jennifer Perilli

» 47 Comments | Post a Comment

If former Richmond Mayor L. Douglas Wilder's slavery museum is being abandoned in Fredericksburg, some Richmond officials say it's time to talk about the project -- or something like it -- for Shockoe Bottom.

"I really feel, that from the very beginning, it should have been in Richmond" because of the city's role in the slave trade, said Del. Delores L. McQuinn, D-Richmond.

McQuinn, a former member of the Richmond City Council, and City Councilwoman Ellen F. Robertson said they want to talk to Mayor Dwight C. Jones about approaching Wilder to see if his U.S. National Slavery Museum might find a home in Shockoe Bottom in light of signs that the project may have shut down in Fredericksburg.

The Main Street Station train shed and nearby Seaboard Building could be used until a permanent museum is built, McQuinn said.

"It's not something that he's considered, and it's not something that's been brought to him," said Jones' press secretary, Tammy D. Hawley.

Wilder has not returned calls in recent days, and there's no indication what his plans for the long-sputtering museum may be.

The nonprofit museum, selected for Fredericksburg in 2001 over sites in Richmond and at Hampton University, has not paid a $24,093 real estate tax bill that was due Nov. 15 for its 38-acre property on the Rappahannock River.

The museum's phone system is set for outgoing calls only. Messages left yesterday with its Washington-based public-relations firm weren't returned.

Lawrence A. Davies, a member of the museum's board of directors and a longtime friend of Wilder, said he has no idea where the project stands.

Davies, a Baptist minister and former mayor of Fredericksburg, said it's unusual for him to have not heard from Wilder for so long: "I can only hope he will surface in some form soon."

. . .

The buzz about the museum comes about two months after remains of the Lumpkin's Slave Jail were unearthed in a parking lot in Shockoe Bottom and as Richmond officials face major decisions about the area's future.

Highwoods Properties has proposed a minor-league baseball stadium as part of Shockoe Center, a $363 million development that would include shops, offices, hotels and residences.

The proposal calls for retail on the first floor of the Main Street Station train shed.

On the building's second floor, GRTC Transit System is planning an open-air downtown bus-transfer center, a project designed to reduce bus traffic on Broad Street and in downtown. Long term, the center also would support regional efforts, including light rail, said John M. Lewis Jr., chief executive officer of GRTC.

With preliminary designs complete, the $70 million transfer center is at "a very important crossroads" for approval and is being positioned for funding through the federal stimulus package, Lewis said.

The city hasn't yet approved the project, but Jones supports the idea, as well as preservation of the Lumpkin's site, Hawley said.

However, City Councilman Bruce W. Tyler said he believes the transfer center should go elsewhere, in part to allow for proper commemoration of Shockoe Bottom's role in the slave trade.

The Lumpkin jail, owned by Robert Lumpkin, held slaves from 1840 until the end of the Civil War, a period when Richmond served as the nation's largest domestic slave market.

Tyler argues that the transfer center would be too expensive and fears that its ramps could end up isolating the 12,000-square-foot archaeological site from the rest of Shockoe Bottom.

"I believe it's time for Richmond to enter into a serious discussion about developing a heritage center, where Lumpkin's jail is a key component," he said. "We have to decide what's more important" -- a transfer center or the area's history.

McQuinn, who leads the Richmond Slave Trail Commission, said she has some concerns about the transfer center but said it's worth seeing how it might be fashioned with the slave-jail site and a potential museum.

"Somebody's going to have to begin the discussion so there can be some decisions made," she said.

Lewis defended the transfer center as a sound investment and a good use for the historic train shed. An initial environment assessment submitted to federal authorities shows the project won't have an adverse impact on the slave-jail site, he said.

"I don't know what the needs are for the museum," Lewis said. "I think it's a great concept. What happens on the first floor is entirely up to the city. We're only taking up the second floor."

The developers for Shockoe Center said they haven't been in contact with Wilder but are interested in talking.

"I think we would be receptive to discussions with the National Slavery Museum and people associated with them," said Ralph L. Axselle Jr., an attorney for the developers. "Richmond is, in many respects one of the most appropriate places to memorialize and honor one of the most difficult periods of our history."



Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or .

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by kct08 on February 26, 2009 at 2:33 pm

Richmond… Why such disdain when speaking of OUR history. The creation of a slavery museum is not just for black Richmonders. This is a museum to teach a history that is often lost post primary school. It’s a reminder to all of us how far we have come and how far we can go.

Speaking from my perspective (a black woman and educator) I see so much hatred about a museum… a learning tool that represents us all.

Comments about getting over it are at best disrespectful to an entire sector of Richmond and then to all black Americans. We are not dwelling… Are you? I have a great sense of pride associated with the fact that my forefathers were slaves and struggled to become so much more. I do not blame you (white Richmonders) or anyone else. Blame doesn’t remove the past, but causes one to linger in it and suffocate themselves.

I love my heritage because you see I cannot trace my heritage back to Africa. The information about my lineage ends with Virginia and slavery. I’m at peace with that disconnect, but I still would love to have a representation of my family in our city. (Someone mentioned Jews… We do have a Holocaust museum)

I am not saying ‘whoa is me’ for being the great-granddaughter of a slave, but I am saying share OUR history.

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on February 26, 2009 at 1:25 pm

fatz9978: I don’t know about that. The free black population of Richmond was very high. Slavery was on the way out in Virginia by 1860. The soil was depleted and places like Richmond were industrializing. I think places like Savannah or Charleston were closer to the ‘heart of darkness’ when it comes to slavery since such a large proportion of their populations were slaves. That brings us full circle on the topic of this string of posts. If the slave museum should be closest to where it had the most impact, why is it coming to Richmond? I suggest this has less to do with doing homage to the past than it has with doing homage to some people’s bank accounts at public expense… some of whom may or may not be named ‘Wilder’.

Flag Comment Posted by Snoopy on February 26, 2009 at 1:20 pm

I don’t unerstand why black folks want a monument or museum to glorify the troubles of their past. It would be like me, an Irish-American, building a museum to the potato famine. That being said, if someone wants a museum to slavery, let them pay for it.

Flag Comment Posted by Anonymous on February 26, 2009 at 1:19 pm

win486,
Yes, I agree it is U.S. History.  But, most of the war occurred in Virginia.  Isn’t logical that Virginia schools put more emphasis on the war than WV or OH?  You are the one that said it was hardly mentioned in WV.

Flag Comment Posted by fatz9978 on February 26, 2009 at 1:12 pm

Richmond benefitted more than any other city in the United States (maybe not New Orleans) from the sale and importation of black people.  It should naturally be the home of a museum dedicated to slavery.

Flag Comment Posted by win486 on February 26, 2009 at 12:55 pm

The Civil War was not Virginia History.  The regimements for the south were very limited in VA and mainly towards the last 2 years. Montgomery, Alabama was the capital 5/29/1861 the Richmond was until 4/2/65. Note: 7 states had secession before Lincoln took office on 3/4/1861. S. Carolina, Mississippe, Alabama, Texas, Florida, Georgia and Louisiana. VA was not there. They came later. Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, Delaware, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Arizona and New Mexico. This is NOT Virginia history it is world and US history.

Flag Comment Posted by Anonymous on February 26, 2009 at 12:14 pm

win486,
Growing up here in VA, the schools here did not teach anything about WV, OH, or PA history.  They taught VA history, which included the Civil War.  I mean most of the war occurred in VA; we are surrounded by battlefields here.  I personally don’t agree with Lee/Jackson day, but do any of the states you mention have holidays that VA does not have?  I believe there is a West Virginia Day that includes Civil War re-enactments?  I believe the kids in IL get a day off in school for Casimir Pulaski Day?

Flag Comment Posted by win486 on February 26, 2009 at 11:46 am

I grew up in West Virginia and we considered it the war between the states.  We became a state when we broke off from Virginia during the war.  It is not mentioned in WV hardly at all.  I lived in the Ohio Valley and Chicago and there it was referred to as the Civil War and people seemed to barely know about it.  I moved here and it was referred to as the war of northern aggression.  All we had Lee, Jackson, King Day and reinactments of a war that was lost.  Do you think Japan reinacts WWII or Germany?  How about a Lincoln/Booth Day or Kennedy/Oswald Day?  That would be just as silly.  By the way, to the rest of the country Virginia is considered to be Mid-Atlantic, not south.  The Carolinas and down are south.

Flag Comment Posted by Anonymous on February 26, 2009 at 11:36 am

jbee,
Nobody up north gives a hoot about the Civil War? I didn’t realize Gettysburg was in the south? Aren’t there many a battle re-enactments up yonder?

Flag Comment Posted by win486 on February 26, 2009 at 11:34 am

jbee73… you are absolutely correct!

Hey the National Civil War Musuem that was recently built at Tredegar down by Brown’s Island is about slavery and all sides, north and south and paid for mainly by donations.  Very little city money went to that endever.  It was going to end all this and just be one big national musuem.  Enough is enough.  Now how about an American indian musuem?  There land, there country…  we took it and put them on a reservation…  Actually they seemed to get over it for the most part.  They talk about it as history but not like it is still happening.  And please stop the black hall of fame and black Ms. America.  We can’t have a white Hall of Fame and White Ms. America. This has got to end sometime. We are a melting pot, we have a black President. Let’s stop the division.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement