Three Richmond officers face obstruction trial
A jury trial starts tomorrow for three Richmond police officers charged with obstruction of justice.
Authorities have said that off-duty officer Ian McCloskey beat up a man in a bar in Shockoe Bottom on Jan. 22, 2008, and that responding officers Floyd T. Campbell II and William A. House tried to cover it up.
McCloskey is accused of threatening a witness.
City prosecutors charged the three officers with obstruction of justice Dec. 18 and turned the case over to special prosecutor Thomas Shaia, a deputy commonwealth's attorney in Spotsylvania County.
Richmond prosecutors have given the following account of what happened late that night at the Wonderland bar:
McCloskey, off duty and in plain clothes, went into the bar and saw an ex-girlfriend and a man sitting in a booth. McCloskey and the woman argued and when the other man interjected, McCloskey punched him about six times in the head, drawing blood.
McCloskey left the scene but later returned. Campbell and House arrived at the bar and soon learned that McCloskey was the suspect, according to court papers Shaia filed in Richmond Circuit Court.
According to the documents, sober witnesses from the bar approached Campbell and House and identified McCloskey as the assailant. But they did not arrest McCloskey, and their notes on the incident stated the assailant could not be identified because of intoxicated witnesses.
Richmond prosecutors initially charged McCloskey with misdemeanor assault in March 2008 and later had the charge dismissed after McCloskey agreed
to pay $5,000 to cover the assault victim's medical expenses. Richmond Commonwealth's Attorney Michael N. Herring said the alleged cover-up was brought to his attention after the assault charge against McCloskey was dismissed.
Defense attorney Will Hutchens, who along with his wife, Suzette Hutchens, is representing House, said his client is innocent. He said the charges have caused emotional distress for House and the other two defendants. He also commented on the fact that the charges were brought nearly one year after the incident. "For this to be brought almost a year later, to me, it demonstrates . . . maybe one or more people are trying to use these officers as fall guys," Will Hutchens said.
Jury selection starts tomorrow at 10 a.m. in Richmond Circuit Court. It will be a seven-person jury, as is standard in misdemeanor cases.
Defense attorney John Rockecharlie, who is representing McCloskey, could not be reached for comment yesterday. Campbell's attorney, Claire G. Cardwell, also could not be reached.
Contact Reed Williams at (804) 649-6332 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
NO BETS NEED TO BE MADE ON THIS ONE…WE ALREADY KNOW THE OUTCOME. WE MAY NOT HEAR ANYTHING ELSE ABOUT IT. THE MEDIA SPOON FEEDS US ANYWAY…PEACE.
bet they get off with little or no punishment!!!! “TWO WEEKS OFF WITH PAY” any takers?
JustAGirl…It’s kinda easy to tell the difference between someone that is drunk and someone that is sober.
And if people think this is the first of its kind, get real. Police have always and will always cover up for each other, it doesn’t just happen in the movies.
SEEING THAT THIS WAS AN OBVIOUS CRIME BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER AGAINST AN INNOCENT MAN AND THEN THE CONSPIRACY TO COVER THE CRIME UP DESERVES MORE THAN A SLAP ON THE HAND…ALL 3 OFFICERS NEED TO BE DISMISSED FROM THEIR DUTIES TO NEVER BE ABLE TO SERVE AND PROTECT AGAIN…PEACE.
I remember this story from when it first broke and it seems to me that it is pretty obvious that the off-duty officer committed assault in full view of a room full of witnesses. It seems equally as obvious that the officer who responded to the call went out of the way to avoid arresting his fellow officer, despite the fact that he had more than ample evidence to justify an arrest.
Ponder this: if YOU, an average citizen, beat the stuffing out of some guy in a jealous rage in a public place, then were identified by numerous witnesses at the scene as the perpetrator, what do you think the chances are the cops are going to write it off? Fat chance.
I fully support and respect honest, principled law enforcement officers, but for the police to retain any semblance of legitimate moral authority, they ought to have a very low tolerance for this type of misconduct from their own. Letting the guy go because he happens to share your profession is unprofessional and contrary to the rule of law. I, for one, am glad that this is being investigated.
“sober witnesses’—how were these people determined to be sober? Sounds like biased and self-serving prosecutorial posturing. All due respect to Mr. Willisams, is this objective reporting?
The article says “According to the documents, sober witnesses from the bar”—how were these ‘witnesses’ determined to be ‘sober’?
Cops are supposed to uphold the law. When they dont and break the law they need to be put in fail and face the music.
Actually, Wonderland is pretty much the furthest thing from a “ghetto club”.
What would even make someone think that?
Thanks for playing, though.
wonderland? what kind of club is that? must be some pretty ghetto place.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement