1-year-old was in van at least 4 hours
Richmond Police Department
A preliminary hearing was set for Aug. 4 for Keishawn L. Whitfield, 23.
Published: July 8, 2009
RELATED: |
A 13-month-old boy who died of heat exposure Monday had been left inside a day-care center van for at least four hours, authorities said yesterday.
Investigators believe Keishawn L. Whitfield, 23, picked up Andrew Joseph Johnson at his home about 7:15 a.m. but thought he had dropped the child off at the Yellow Brick Road Day Care & Learning Center, where he dropped off other children.
After making his rounds, Whitfield, an employee of the center at 2003 Fourth Ave., went home about noon, authorities say. He discovered the child in the van about four hours later. Authorities still are investigating the toddler's exact whereabouts from the time he was picked until about noon.
The state medical examiner's office yesterday ruled that the boy died of environmental heat exposure.
Authorities responded to Whitfield's home at 2719 Garland Ave. after receiving an emergency medical call Monday at 4:30 p.m.
Whitfield, who was arrested in 2007 on a charge of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, appeared in Richmond Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court yesterday on a single count of felony child neglect in the toddler's death.
Whitfield appeared by video in front of Judge Richard B. Campbell, who set bond at $20,000. He was released from the city lockup later yesterday after posting bail.
Richmond Commonwealth's Attorney Michael N. Herring said his office will consider whether to upgrade the charge against Whitfield.
Campbell scheduled a preliminary hearing for Aug. 4 and agreed to a request by Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney Mary E. Langer that Whitfield not be allowed to have any contact with children.
Defense attorney John W. Luxton described Johnson's death as clearly an accident and said he has known Whitfield's family for several years. Whitfield typically drove the van three to four times daily, Luxton said.
"I can't imagine what happened," Luxton said. "It was a tragedy for everybody involved, particularly for the parents of the child."
Valerot Whitlow, the owner of the day-care center and Whitfield's mother, attended the 5-minute video proceeding with family and neighbors. She did not comment after the hearing, but one neighbor, Charlene Sutton, said, "We know it's a bad situation, and we just let God prevail."
A neighbor who lives next door to Whitfield described the family as good, hard-working people who were distraught about what happened. The neighbor, who declined to be identified, said he talked with Whitfield's brother after emergency crews responded and "he was angry that it happened."
"He was angry . . . because nobody noticed the child until [Whitfield] found" him in the van after returning home on Garland Avenue. The boy was still alive, and Whitfield tried to resuscitate him before emergency crews arrived, the neighbor said.
"I'm just sorry it happened," the neighbor said. "I can't imagine the grief that Keishawn is feeling. He's a good kid."
In a statement released to the news media, the toddler's family said, "Our hearts are filled with mixed emotions and great sorrow."
"Andrew was our beloved angel and miracle baby," the family added. "Even though he's sleeping, he will always be loved, remembered and missed. Only time can heal our hearts, and we appreciate your condolences and prayers."
Whitfield was charged in November 2007 with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. He initially pleaded guilty but withdrew his plea. In January, a judge found that there was sufficient evidence to convict on a charge of possession but took the case under advisement and placed Whitfield under supervision, Langer said yesterday.
Yellow Brick Road received its city business license in late 2001. The center had undergone 14 unannounced inspections since early 2004, none of them related to complaints, according to Virginia Department of Social Services records. Yellow Brick Road got a two-year extension of its state license as a result of the last inspection, on Feb. 3, which found the center in substantial compliance with state regulations.
However, the state inspector cited the center for four violations, including lack of documentation of satisfactory Child Protective Services and criminal-history background checks for three employees. The inspector did not name the employees, but the owner responded that she was sending the background-check forms immediately.
The Department of Social Services wouldn't identify the day-care center's employees whose records were missing.
Under the department's policy, a felony drug conviction would disqualify a person from working in a day-care center, but that is not the case with a deferred disposition. In such a situation, which is rare, a judge takes a case under advisement and delays formal conviction, usually to give a person a chance to wipe their record clean if they can straighten themselves out after an arrest.
Not until the person is actually convicted -- and convicted of a felony rather than a misdemeanor -- would he or she be barred from working in the day-care center, said department spokeswoman Melissa Perdue.
Whitfield's mother, who owns the day-care center, sought appointment to the Richmond City Council in 2003 to temporarily fill the vacancy left by the resignation of 6th District Councilman Sa'ad El-Amin. She was among six candidates for the seat and promised not to run for re-election that fall. The seat was filled by Ellen F. Robertson, who still represents the district.
Contact Mark Bowes at (804) 649-6450 or
.
Contact Michael Martz at (804) 649-6964 or .
Contact Reed Williams at (804) 649-6332 or .
Staff writer David Ress contributed to this report.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Good kids don’t deal drugs or use them. This low-life creep should not be allowed around children.
Good points….seems like more than one negligent person in this scenario. Why didn’t they shut the place down until an investigation had been completed? Has anyone sent their children to this daycare since this happened? I sure hope not.
It seems Mr. Whitfield’s job was to pick up children from their homes and take them to the day care center. He picked up this child and “thought” he dropped him off. Could it have been he picked up a group of children on his rounds and when he unloaded them at the center this child was overlooked for whatever reasons ??? Picking up only this one child and never returning to the day care center would seem more like a kidnapping to me. Either way, the child was expected to arrive at the day care center that morning. When the child never arrived at the center wouldn’t this have raised any concern or alarm from the staff members? All of the daycare’s my children attended when they were younger had a mandatory policy if they were not going to be attending I had to call and make them aware. If it was a school age child who did not arrive from school the center needed to make sure the child was not left behind. I cannot imagine a day care center who provides at home pick up transportation services not requiring a parent to contact the center if the child will not be attending simply for no other reason than to let them know transportation was not needed and save the driver from an unnecessary trip.
How did this lack of communication fall through the cracks? Did the staff not notice the child was not dropped off or did Mr. Whitfield “forget” to tell them he picked up the child?
I couldn’t help but notice that the lead in said the baby had been left in the van for at least 4 hours, however, later it sounds like we would be reasonably safe to assume that it was more like 8 hours or more, from the time he was picked up until 4:30pm, when the MORON decided to call 911. And, NO, I do not believe that the baby was still alive at 4;00pm. For any defense attorney to suggest that such a blatant negligence by someone working as a paid professional daycare worker who is entrusted with the care of other’s children could be called “clearly an accident”...Such an attorney should immediately seek an eye exam because there is nothing clear or accidental about this incident! I can’t imagine what this family is going through, my prayers go out to them.
“good kids” don’t deal crack. sorry, but giving praises to our youth when they are not deserved results in those children not understanding what shouldn’t be tolerated in their behavior.
Great investigative work by the RTD staff! Read the last three paragraphs very carefully ... it would be a shame if a family managed to obtain a “deferred deposition” through political connections (can our judges and city prosecutors be influenced by political connections?) for an accused drug-dealing family member. If that was the case, one could argue (morally) that those folks indirectly contributed to the child’s death. Mr. Whitfield was also accused of dealing drugs within 1,000 feet of a school - wonder what happened to that charge? And one must really wonder what Mr. Whitfield was doing between 8 and 12 the day the child died.
i find it very ironic that this daycare was given 3 violations and yet i have done some research and this is one of the daycare centers that social services places lower income children in. If a parent cannot afford the daycare prices, social services will coordinate with the daycare a fee that is affordable. Bet social services doesn’t disclose the violations while they are enrolling the children. This whole case disgusts me! Anyone that feels sorry for this daycare or the accused I encourage you to place a metal box in a sunny spot, lock yourself in it & wait to see what happens.
Seems pretty clear that mom was covering for her son so he could work for her without a background check. Wonder if the other two employees without background checks were family members as well.
Also - does anyone know if 14 unnanounced inspections in 5 years is normal? It seems we are always reading about children being abused and/or killed because they fell through the cracks of an overburdened social services system. Yet SS can visit one daycare 14 times? Just seems odd to me but I’m not familiar with this kind of thing.
The news said they reopened today - I hope every parent pulls their child out so this place will be forced to close.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement