State probing day-care center after toddler’s death
ALEXA WELCH EDLUND/TIMES-DISPATCH
Richmond Police detective Victoria Griffith leaves the Yellow Brick Road Day Care during an investigation of 13-month-old Andrew Joseph Johnson’s death.
Virginia social-services regulators are conducting an investigation that could cost a Richmond child day-care center its license to operate after the death of a 13-month-old boy in one of its vans.
Yellow Brick Road Day Care & Learning Center was closed yesterday as social-services officials interviewed employees inside the business in Highland Park, said owner Valerot Whitlow and Brenda Barnett, who has two sisters employed there.
The state launched the investigation immediately after the death of Andrew Joseph Johnson, who was discovered in a van operated by Yellow Brick Road on Monday afternoon. The toddler died of environmental heat exposure after being left alone in the van for at least four hours.
Authorities have charged Whitlow's son, Keishawn L. Whitfield, a day-care employee who was driving the van, with felony child neglect.
In a brief interview outside the day-care center, Whitlow said the social-services investigators were "making sure that we're doing what we're supposed to do."
She said she hoped to reopen today and added that her son would not be working there. She declined further comment.
The investigation by the Virginia Department of Social Services is being conducted separately from an ongoing criminal investigation.
"We would be looking at it from a regulatory standpoint," said Brent Kennedy, operations manager for the agency's licensing division.
Kennedy said he would not comment on the investigation until it is completed and a determination is made, which he said should happen soon. Investigators for the agency's Central District field office, based in Henrico County, conducted a detailed inspection yesterday at the center.
Richmond investigators believe Whitfield picked up Andrew at his home in Whitcomb Court at 7:15 a.m. Monday and thought he had dropped off the toddler at the center at 2003 Fourth Ave., where other children were dropped off that morning.
Whitfield drove the large white van, which seats about 10 people, to his home in the 2700 block of Garland Avenue around noon and went to sleep. He found the toddler in the back of the van about 4 p.m., called police within about a half-hour, and attempted to revive the child.
Authorities believe Andrew was in the van from the time he was picked up that morning until he was discovered late that afternoon. Investigators have no evidence suggesting that any employee in addition to Whitfield was in the van. The vehicle was in police custody yesterday.
State licensing standards require at least one day-care employee or the driver to remain in the vehicle whenever a child is present. The standards also state: "Staff shall verify that all children have been removed from the vehicle at the conclusion of any trip."
If investigators find Yellow Brick Road substantially in violation of state licensing standards for day-care centers, the state could recommend revocation of the center's license, which was renewed for two years in February.
However, the center could continue operating, with increased state inspections, while going through a three-stage process that ultimately could be decided in circuit court.
Richmond Commonwealth's Attorney Michael N. Herring said yesterday that it is too soon to determine if any additional criminal charges are justified. A city police detective was inside the day-care center yesterday, but she declined to comment as she left.
Currently, only Whitfield has been charged, with felony child neglect. He was released Tuesday on $20,000 bond pending a preliminary hearing Aug. 4.
The day-care center was licensed by the state in late 2001. The city approved an increase in the center's capacity from 25 to 40 children in 2007.
Barnett said outside Yellow Brick Road yesterday that social-services investigators were inside interviewing her two sisters, who work for the day-care center. One of Barnett's sisters, she said, had grown fond of Andrew.
"It really hurt her heart," Barnett said. "She really loved that little boy."
She added that Yellow Brick Road takes good care of children. "They were in good hands," she said.
Normally, day-care centers undergo unannounced state inspections every six to eight months.
The state had conducted 14 inspections at Yellow Brick Road since 2004 and found regulatory violations on 11 occasions. Most of the violations were minor and quickly corrected.
Among them were violations of record-keeping requirements, including the lack of a daily record for two infants there in 2007 and for one infant in care there during an inspection the previous year.
The last inspection, on Feb. 3, found Yellow Brick Road to be substantially in compliance with state requirements and recommended renewal of the center's license for two years. However, the inspector also noted the lack of criminal-background and Child Protective Services checks for three employees, who were not named.
Whitfield had been put under court supervision in January on a drug possession charge. He had been charged with felony possession of cocaine with intent to distribute it in late 2007.
He initially pleaded guilty and then withdrew the plea. The judge found in January that the evidence was sufficient to convict Whitfield of felony cocaine possession, but he took the case under advisement and put the defendant under supervision instead of convicting him.
Had Whitfield been convicted on the charge, he would have been prohibited from working at the center under state law.
Contact Michael Martz at (804) 649-6964 or
.
Staff writer Reed Williams contributed to this report.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I agree with sick of stupid and a few other recent posts..a child has been carelessly forgotten and unfortunately become the victim to not just 1 person’s bad judgement but a few people
‘s judgements down the road. Do tax payers pay for the child care of lower income famalies? lol-just as much as it pays for the well paid salaries of our congress and other govt employees! That is so far from the point of this tragedy that its pathetic someone’s mind bends in that direction vs towards the sympathy the family deserves.There were opportunities to help prevent this child’s death from occuring, and every single person that could have prevented it took their paycheck and went home..meanwhile the family of this child is heartbroken, i’m sure, and has thousands of “how could that happen” questions along with the rest of our community. We should focus on how to KEEP this from happening again.Parents if you have your child in childcare, REQUEST AND QUESTION THEIR REVIEWS.
My prayers are with the parents of the dead child.
The day care SHOULD be slammed by Social Services - the owner’s are the one’s responsible for their employees actions - so obviously “controls” are NOT in place b/c they aren’t working.
MAI TAI’s post of “it happens” is CRAP (not at you MAI TAI) - who cares if it is a preacher or this kid; they are ALL IDIOTS if they are not paying attention to the children in their custody/prtoection.
Sorry, prison is TOO GOOD a punishment for someone who allows a toddler to suffocate in a car - I dont’ care what their ‘excuse’ is
the mother/owner says that social services is “making sure that we’re doing what we’re supposed to do.“ Wake up lady! If you were doing what your were suppose to this baby would still be alive. If you didn’t allow your deadbeat dad, crack dealing son that needed to go home and take a nap after a few hours of work which by the way wasn’t even manual labor, he was driving a van, work in your ill run daycare this tradgedy could have been prevented. Furhtermore as the driver was leaving to go take his nap did it not occur to anyone to ask him if he had picked up the little boy since he should have been in school & was not? Earlier articles stated that the defense attorney has know the family for years so my question is exactly how much trouble has the accused been in?
The defendents lawyer said he had an exemplary work record. Unfortunately, 99% is not good enough in many areas and this is one of them.
I found the lawyers remarks to be insulting, both to the family and to the public at large. if 99% is ok with you (this is not a history test people), then be a sanitation engineer. But dont go into a vocation where innocent young lives are in your care.
It’s not like the pastor that left his kid in the back of the car all day. If state mandate says at the conclusion of each trip that a worker must verify that all children have been removed from the vehicle, then it’s obvious that the young man didn’t follow policy, and now a child is dead because he didn’t follow that policy!!! NO EXCUSE WHATSOEVER!!!!
WITH ALL DUE RESPECT MAI TAI…
Mr. Whitfield did not operate at a fast
pace. He slept all day and was a druggie. He was not distracted by major events other than his self indulgent lifestyle that his mother somehow
supported. There are no excuses for Mr. Whitfield in this matter—What happened to the child is the Tragedy—Do not include Mr. Whitfield in the same
Breath. He needs to be off the streets—And it is a TRAGEDY that he is not……!!
This is unfortunate, but it happens. Like the pastor that left his child in the backseat. I think it’s sad that some of us operate at such a fast pace that things like this can happen.
This poor guy and the poor family of the child that died—it’s a true tragedy.
A major lack of organization!
“Richmond investigators believe Whitfield picked up Andrew at his home in Whitcomb Court at 7:15 a.m. Monday and thought he had dropped off the toddler at the center at 2003 Fourth Ave., where other children were dropped off that morning”
A simple Transportation or Movement of child manifest would have probably saved a tragedy from happening. You pickup up a child from their resident and fill in the blanks. Childs names, time of pickup, location and parents signature. Transport the child and drop the child off at Daycare, notate time and driver and daycare worker initialize manifest. You repeat the process when and if you are returning the child to their residence or any movement during the day whenever a child leaves the daycare facility.
The driver checks the vehicle before he or she begins and repeats the process after.
He “thought” he dropped the child off at the day. Repetition leads to carelessness!
A HORRIBLE EVENT
I wrote day before yesterday about the brinks drivers and the jewelers being more careful with treasure than some people are with their children (July 7, 8:53 am) and I thought the incident was a tragedy. But as the news on this story has increased it has became apparent to me just how insidious, how utterly horrible this event has been. This lady hired her loser son—probably thinking it would keep him out of trouble to watch over innocent kids—She could also save money by NOT hiring someone responsible. He was such a responsible person that according to the report—he finished his delivery and went to bed—(during the day)(such
a long night at work—right). He probably has never done a decent days work of any kind or created anything of worth in his life…and now a child is dead because his relatives wanted to save money…
And yet—if you go to places like the Market on Church Hill you will see young people at work being responsible—There are any number of young women (and men)—who for some extra change while out from college or high school would have done an excellent job—and would not be so drug dazed and stupid as to leave a child in the van to die…Some will argue that this was just a slip up.(Like the times Whitfield slipped up and was arrested). Others will indirectly defend the negligent creep as “distracted”—
Ladies & Gentlemen—this is an example of the grosser negligence—the type that carries manslaughter convictions. This should be the end of that business—which already had been cited for violations—And this should be the start of Mr. Whitfield’s new job working for the Corrections Dept. which he was already destined for. Any day
care owner that would entrust any child to Whitfield has lost their way—or their marbles. This is a matter of justice—for the child and for the Community—Do not retreat to the
argument that we must not labour this point—and just pray for the family—NO—Let the Commonwealth hear the voice of this infant—Demand the ultimate price least we defend the dregs of society of whom Mr. Whitfield is one !
“taxpayers pay this and taxpayers pay that, and this is a waste of my taxpaying money, blah blah blah blah….“ I get so sick of hearing that same complaint that it irks my nerves…life isn’t fair, im pretty sure you were taught that as a child (or maybe you weren’t, who knows). Anyway, its all a part of life. You pay taxes on things that you feel are unfair to you. Get up and do something about it then. Stop complaining so much, it starts to fall on deaf ears, and gets you nowhere!
Now go ahead, reply with this and that, but it still boils down to what it is, complaining, whining and crying
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement