Daughter of Va. Supreme Court chief justice convicted of shoplifting

» 12 Comments | Post a Comment

A substitute judge convicted Joanna I. Hassell of shoplifting today and suspended a 30-day sentence.

Substitute General District Judge Steven H. Helvin rejected efforts by Hassell's lawyer to acknowledge she took the clothing but to delay consideration of the case to a future date.

Henrico Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney Michael Huberman said the move was designed to eventually have the charge dismissed.

Hassell, the 18-year-old daughter of Leroy R. Hassell Sr., the chief justice of the state Supreme Court, left Macy's at Regency Square mall April 11 without paying for several items of clothing. The clothes were valued at $71.97.

Hassell, a Henrico resident and student at the University of Virginia, had performed more than 100 hours of community service before her trial yesterday.

Helvin, of Charlottesville, was named to hear the case after Henrico General District judges recused themselves.

-- Bill McKelway

Advertisement

 
View More: supreme court of va,latest news,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by edrebber on June 26, 2009 at 12:38 pm

Why should we attribute community service performed before sentencing to the punishment for the crime?

Flag Comment Posted by lakotahope on June 26, 2009 at 7:20 am

100 hours of community service already performed…Before going to trial for sentencing???  Come on, people get community service at conviction when they get their time. What kind of community service—Secret Shopper?  Yeah, just like that son of a former cop that ran over that man riding on his moped and fled the scene and got no prison time. Virtually no Time.  The Average Human in these circumstances would be given punishment.

Flag Comment Posted by datony on June 25, 2009 at 11:52 pm

“Jack” is right….the judicial system is biased at best…and a joke to boot lol….but for a person stealing less than $200 in va, the crime is a misdemeanor, not a felony and it is punishable for UP TO a year in jail..not prison unless they have prior or additional convictions along with that charge….and as far as serving the community service BEFORE the trial…that is simply to justify the sentence to us because they didnt want to appear biased or look as if they were giving preferrential treatment…but they are.  At the very least, she should’ve gotten 6 mths with 5 and a half suspended….this reeks of favoritism…..

Flag Comment Posted by janick526 on June 25, 2009 at 4:03 pm

One year and a fine that is the punishment for this crime for a first timer although most of it can be suspended it would put Ms. Hassel on notice that these actions will not be tolerated regardless who your daddy is.

Flag Comment Posted by jerry78linda on June 25, 2009 at 3:58 pm

Bottom line here is she has a “conviction” on her record.  That doesn’t go away.  Whether she served time or not, her reputation is toast.  How could she ruin her life over $71?  Some people just don’t think before they act.

Flag Comment Posted by Jack on June 25, 2009 at 3:52 pm

The judge should have taken the average sentence for fist time shoplifting under $100 for all cases in Virgina and imposed that. At the very least a 12 month sentence with 11 months suspended.

This smacks of unequal justice because of who she is and the probable pressure exerted on the judges by her father to let her off or at the very minimum.

Shoplifting is a serious crime regardless of the value of items stolen. We all end up paying for these losses and the extremely light sentences gives those inclined to shoplift a go-ahead. Stealing a dress is in no way different than stealing a car. Theft is theft and is against the law.

Flag Comment Posted by mjrichmond on June 25, 2009 at 3:39 pm

I’m not a bleeding-heart when it comes to crime and punishment but for a first-time offender that was a reasonable punishment.  1 yr in prison for a first-time offender for shoplifting??....gimme a break.  Maybe you could justify a longer commuted sentence but jail time for 1st time offender shoplifting under $100…I dont think so.  She already performed community service, I think this was a fair judgment regardless of who she was.

Flag Comment Posted by janick526 on June 25, 2009 at 12:29 pm

Every post is dead on the sorry judges caved as this is the norm had it been somebody from the “hood” in the same circumstances they would have recieved the 1 year punishment for shoplifting less than $200 and a nice fine to boot. Judges looking out for one another….

Flag Comment Posted by mellen on June 25, 2009 at 12:19 pm

Had it been you, me or anyone else that does not have that all important “Do you know who my father is” card, we would be doing the minimum time for shoplifting.

And the Judicial system wonders why people put it down so much. The laws are for EVERYONE! Not just the common people.

Flag Comment Posted by J-Reb on June 24, 2009 at 8:53 pm

UVA student?  Honor Code!  She’s out!

Or, she would be except for ‘special circumstances’...

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement