SEAL trainee’s mom wants to free her son from prison
Former Navy Seal trainee Dustin Turner was interviewed at the Powhatan Correctional Facility in July. COMING TOMORROW: Chat live at noon on TimesDispatch.com with staff writer Bill Geroux about the SEAL case.
Related Info
|
SLIDESHOW
The SEAL murder
THE SERIES
Part I - A college student on vacation in Virginia disappearsPart II - The SEAL trainees’ stories don’t add up Part III - The trainees go on trial Part IV - A mother’s desperate quest to clear her son Part V - One man changes his story, but will it free the other? |
SPECIAL SERIES: What Happened To Jennifer Evans?
Fourth of five parts
VIRGINIA BEACH Not for one moment did Linda Summitt believe her son had committed murder.
She first recognized trouble in Dustin A. Turner's voice when he called home to Bloomington, Ind., on June 27, 1995.
"I have to tell you something," he said. "I witnessed a murder."
He said he could not tell her more.
Summitt kept trying to call Dustin back at Fort A.P. Hill, where he and other SEAL trainees drilled with small arms. An officer said everything would be fine with her son. Summitt arranged to have Dustin meet with a lawyer.
Early the next morning, the lawyer called to report Dustin had been arrested along with fellow trainee Billy Joe Brown on charges of killing a young woman named Jennifer Evans. Dustin claimed to have been a shocked witness to Billy choking her to death.
Summitt hired one of the most prominent criminal defense lawyers in Hampton Roads, but Dustin was convicted of murder and sentenced to 82 years in prison.
Summitt, a soft-spoken, 45-year-old second-grade teacher, set out to free him. She studied legal documents and wrote letters on Dustin's behalf to public officials, church leaders, civic groups and reporters.
Each letter contained a small photo of Dustin in his Navy uniform. Some people showed only pity for a heartbroken mother. They underestimated Summitt.
She visited Dustin in prison every two months with help from family and friends, who gave her money and frequent-flier miles. Summitt told her story to anyone who would listen, and some strangers allowed her to stay at their homes when she visited him in prison.
Summitt poured more than $200,000 into her son's defense and the family's campaign to clear his name, including a second mortgage on their home and much of their retirement money.
Dustin was running out of appeals.
. . .
Dustin had spent seven years behind bars by the spring of 2003, when he called his mother from Augusta Correctional Center near Staunton with jaw-dropping news: Billy had found religion in prison and started telling everyone he had killed Jennifer by himself.
The news came from an inmate recently transferred to Augusta from the prison at Keen Mountain in Southwest Virginia, where Billy was serving a 72-year sentence.
Summitt did not want to approach Billy herself. She had written him after the trial asking him to recant and free Dustin, and she had received a terse reply. She chose a lawyer at random from the town of Richlands, the nearest town to Keen Mountain, and asked him to obtain a sworn statement from Billy.
Billy was willing.
He told the lawyer he had found God and did not want to stand before him as a liar on judgment day. He said he choked Jennifer to death in Dustin's car, in the nightclub parking lot, simply because he was very drunk and out of sorts. "I just snapped," he would testify later.
Summitt drove to Richlands to pick up the affidavit, which she believed would be Dustin's ticket to freedom. But she was not aware of Virginia's 21-day rule that prohibits new evidence from being introduced into criminal cases more than 21 days after a conviction.
The 21-day deadline, designed to keep the appeals process from dragging endlessly, is the strictest in the nation. The General Assembly created an exception to the rule for DNA and other biological evidence in 2001 -- after the state nearly executed Earl Washington for a killing he did not commit.
Two years later, the legislature considered a bill to allow certain other types of evidence and testimony after 21 days.
State Sen. Kenneth W. Stolle, R-Virginia Beach, one of the key lawmakers involved, recalled recently that the bill was designed to include only powerful evidence such as undiscovered videotapes or testimony from witnesses unavailable at the trials.
Stolle said he and other members of the state crime commission specifically agreed the new law should not allow Billy's changed story to overturn Dustin's murder conviction. Stolle went as far as to call Jennifer's mother and reassure her of that.
But Summitt saw opportunity in the proposed bill. She lobbied for it, collecting thousands of signatures on a petition in Virginia Beach in support of the bill, which subsequently became law.
She carried a separate petition asking then-Gov. Mark R. Warner to pardon Dustin. Not everyone would sign it; a few people she approached in Virginia Beach remembered the case and spoke harshly of Dustin.
. . .
But Dustin's plea for clemency won support from a surprise source: The foreman of his jury wrote a letter saying most jurors did not believe he killed Jennifer but didn't understand the law and didn't want to let Dustin walk.
Warner did not pardon Dustin.
Late last year, however, the Virginia Court of Appeals agreed to review Dustin's case in light of the new law allowing testimony after 21 days.
One appeals court judge had to sit out the case -- Robert Humphreys, who as Virginia Beach commonwealth's attorney in 1995 had sent Dustin and Billy to prison.
Under the new state law, the testimony had to be so credible and significant that if it had been offered at the trial, "no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt." The Court of Appeals assigned Virginia Beach Circuit Judge Frederick Lowe to listen to Billy's latest confession and decide if it was credible.
After 13 years, this was a chance.
Summitt pictured Dustin walking out of prison, getting a fresh start, applying for a new driver's license. She called him a fine young man who froze and panicked in the face of Billy's sudden violence. "He had just turned 20," Summitt said, and "he had been brainwashed" by the Navy to take orders and be loyal. "He really did let Billy Brown guide him around."
Summitt said her heart aches for Jennifer's mother. "We have been on totally different paths, but really, we're both victims."
. . .
From her home outside Atlanta, Jennifer's mother, Delores Evans, has followed Summitt's crusade with a mixture of frustration and anger.
"I understand that when you're a mother, you'd probably do anything for the good of your child," Evans said in a recent interview. "But Turner's mother could be a little more level-headed. He's not the choirboy he wants people to believe and that she apparently believes."
Evans, a retired computer specialist, said Summitt wrote her several letters after the trial, saying Dustin had not killed Jennifer. Evans read only the first one and did not respond.
At first, the Evanses had focused their anger at the SEALs, accusing the Navy in a federal lawsuit of transforming Dustin and Billy into "lethal weapons" who thought they stood above the law. A judge threw out the suit in 1998.
But afterward, Evans said, a SEAL contacted her through her pastor and told her the SEALs had cleaned up their act as a result of the case. His phone call was "one of the blessings God sent me," she said.
Evans said she believes Dustin and Billy choked her daughter unconscious and then drove her out of the parking lot into some other location where they meant to have sex with her and ended up choking her to death.
But even if Dustin is telling the truth, she said, he failed to stop a killing and then drove the passed-out killer 45 miles out of town so they could dump the body together. Evans said Dustin's bland admission of poor judgment burns against her mental image of Jennifer's body lying in the woods for nine days.
"Turner was there, he had every chance to clear himself of any wrongdoing," Evans said. "All he had to do was honk the horn, or yell for help or drive to the police station."
She said Virginia should toughen its laws if everything Dustin admits to doing adds up to nothing but a misdemeanor. Delores and Al stay in touch with Jennifer's friends and with the annual recipients of a scholarship at Emory University in her name, established by some Virginia Beach police officers.
Delores remembers Jennifer smiling and flipping back her shoulder-length brown hair, and the way she "always gave her best even when she wasn't the best at something." The Evanses did not relish returning to Virginia Beach after 12 years to face Dustin and Billy again.
"Every time I start to get my little canoe balanced under me, a letter will come or the phone will ring or some other motion will be filed," she said. "Only with the help of God am I able to get through this. That's my only solace.
NEXT: One man changes his story, but will it free the other?
"Whatever happens here on Earth, God knows who's guilty and who's innocent, and he will have his day of reckoning."
Contact Bill Geroux at (757) 498-2820 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I’ve been reading this series and am amazed at some of the reports. ‘An accessory after the fact?‘ HE sat in the seat beside her while she was being murdered and HE drove that girl’s body 45 minutes away to dump her body. And, after sitting in prison for years, he says what he did is ‘probably’ morally wrong? I’ve not read anything that indicates that he feels remorse for her being dead - only that he’s in the middle of the murder and feels victimized that he’s paying the price now. I don’t see any indications of rehabilitation in his remarks. It’s all about him.
It’s a shame what happened to this girl, it was terrible. I think it’s a shame also how people want to point the finger and say Dusty should stay in prison.
People feel that he is guilty for a murder just because he was there? He should be guilty for ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT, not murder. He has done his time.
The girl was killed instantly, how can you stop something that happens so fast?
In the military, you do as you are told. If someone says go, you go. If someone says give me ten pushups, you give them ten pushups. You don’t ask questions. He was hearing an order and he did as he was told.
I have read and watched alot about this case, And I don’t think he did it for more than one reason. He was guilty for something, but not murder!
It has been posted earlier, but anybody that thinks these two were equally involved or that Turner sat by idly while Jennifer was killed, needs to get informed.
Go to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtwDEteVycM&feature=related
The entire situation is horrific—for both families. Some of the media has tried to be unbiased; other sources have been blatantly slanted. I’m certainly biased also because I’ve known Dusty and his family for 28 years. Dusty and my sons were in Scouts together, were swim team mates, attended the same schools, went to the same church, visited each others’ homes….the Dusty I knew and still know is not the Dusty portrayed in the negative media. Did he make a terrible mistake? Of course! Has he paid for his mistake? Most certainly! As a mother, my heart breaks for both mothers involved in this tragedy, as well as for Dusty. Dusty and his family are in my family’s prayers daily. No one is trying to diminish the horribleness of this situation, but Dusty has certainly paid for his part in this. It is time that in the “Court of Justice” all the truth is considered which will legally free Dusty.
This thing stinks to high heaven. What is a State Senator getting involved with the outcome of an individual case? How can he propose that the new 21 day revision will not free anybody? Are we to believe there is no political pressure for the outcome Sen Stolle and his friends want for their political purposes.
A State Senator should be proposing and passing good law: not determining how it will be used. Sen Stolle is a Republican. You know, the party of limited government and not meddling in our individual liberties. Why is he calling a victims family to predict an outcome?
If the evidence supports Turner’s participation in abduction and murder, he is right where he belongs. But it doesn’t seem that is the case. Now it appears a deceptive prosecution has come back to haunt the Commonwealth, and politics is more important than getting to the truth.
If you believe Brown’s testimony, and what Turner has said from the beginning: he did not watch Brown kill Jennifer. He tried to pull Brown off of her. During the original trial, Dr Foer testified that Brown’s massive size and strength, when he attacked her from the back seat and pulled back: he virtually hung the poor girl within seconds.
In the recent evidentiary hearing, Brown stated he was so drunk he only recalls bits and pieces of the event: but does remember Turner trying to pull his arms off Jennifer - but it was too late
He watched while someone killed a young woman. His mom excuses that by saying the army trained him to obey orders. NO one thinks being in the armed services includes letting your buddy kill a girl, that is NOT part of military training. He is still guilty of a horrible choice. HE let a girl DIE. and now he should pay for his deliberate choice. forever
Kate’s mom.
Of course it is horrible what happened to the Evans family. It is awful to lose a child. The question then becomes how did they lose her.
Was it a premeditated abduction/murder by two ruthless SEAL trainees? If so, let them rot. If it was a drunken rage killing by one, and a panicked cover up by his best friend: that is an entirely different story - both morally and by law.
If the crime occurred in the Bayou parking lot the way both men describe, and how Turner has described from the beginning: the Evans family was put through way more than 8 days of torment for no reason. The evidence in the car would show that. Why do we hear nothing from the VBPD or Commonwealth about the evidence in the car?
Billy Brown killed Jennifer Evans in a drunken rage in the Bayou parking lot, and then destroyed Turner and his family’s life out of spite for Turner taking police to the body. It is a fate not as bad as the Evans, but horrible just the same
Finally, 4 days into your series, the victim and her family are recognized. Even if this defendant was not the primary killer of their daughter, he participated in the murder and cover up and worst of all, he left her parents in the agony of not knowing where she was or what happened. Can any of you imagine how it feels to have your child left to decompose in the woods like so much garbage? Well I know how it feels, and it is too horrible to describe.


Advertisement