A primer on the basics of the Chesapeake Bay
If you walk onto the Mayo Bridge by Shockoe Slip and drop a line on the downstream side, you essentially are fishing in the Chesapeake Bay.
If you dump pollution in the Shenandoah River, beyond the Blue Ridge Mountains, you can hurt the bay.
As we try to restore the Chesapeake, it helps to ask: Where is the bay, and what are we trying to restore?
Your basic bay
Experts call the 200-mile-long expanse of water from Norfolk to Havre de Grace, Md., the "main stem" of the bay. At its widest point, near the mouth of the Potomac River, it is about 35 miles across.
That probably is what most people consider the bay.
The big bucket
The Chesapeake Bay is an estuary, an area where fresh water flowing from land meets salt water from the sea.
The Chesapeake Bay, as a natural system, includes the tidal portions of the rivers that flow into it, experts say.
And that includes the James River up to the fall line -- the place where, if you moved up the river with the tide, you hit the first rapids.
The Mayo Bridge -- also called the 14th Street Bridge -- divides those two zones, with roaring rapids on the west side and tidal waters to the east.
"The Chesapeake Bay starts under 14th Street Bridge," said Greg Garman, a Virginia Commonwealth University fisheries ecologist. "There's probably a little artistic license, but fundamentally I don't see anything wrong with saying that."
Even though the James doesn't get salty until just below Hopewell, classic bay species such as blue crabs, mullet, flounder and young menhaden, spot and croaker frequent the James all the way up to downtown Richmond, Garman said.
Mike Gerel, a scientist for the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, an environmental group, sees the bay and its tidal tributaries -- not only the James, but also the Rappahannock River, the Potomac and others -- as a bucket. That's the place where the pollution goes.
Streams that feed these tidal areas are like little hoses filling the bucket, Gerel said. "What we're hoping to restore is the bucket."
The true footprint
Cleanup officials are working throughout the bay's watershed. That's the area in which all flowing waters -- including Gerel's hoses -- move toward the bay, picking up pollutants along the way.
That watershed covers more than 64,000 square miles in parts of six states -- Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, New York, Pennsylvania and West Virginia -- and the District of Columbia.
More than half of Virginia, from the Tri-Cities area north, lies in the bay watershed.
Cleaning streams in the watershed will affect people far from the coast.
"Even if you don't care about the bay," Gerel said, "you care about the stream in your backyard."
Contact Rex Springston at (804) 649-6453 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
bluecrab tell me how stopping me from adding 20 x28 feet onto the end of my home because i am within 100 feet of a lake is going to save the bay when builders can scrape the land down to hardpan over 100 acres. it’s large scale development that is killing the bay not individual home owners adding a few feet onto their homes regardless of distance from waterfront. i have watched the creek that runs thru my yard for 20 years and the ‘'wet lands’‘ do nothing to stop the sediment from the farm thats 1/2 mile away when heavy storms move large quantities of sediment. the small amount of sediment generated by my adding onto my home would be a grain of sand compared to the amount of sediment created by large scale clear cut development. yet i am prohibited from adding onto my home while the developers can scrape scrape scrape tell me how this is being treated equally under the law?
First, Please understand that I AM a waterfront property owner born and raised on the Eastern Shore of Virginia I know from experience about the Bay and property regulations. I am stunned by the comments to these articles. “26 years with no positive results” somehow leads one reader to the conclusion that we need to let people develop their land however they want??! What it SHOULD show is that 26 years with NO REGULATION has all but destroyed what once was the Chesapeake Bay. Environmental groups were not paid money to clean the Bay like one would pay a “janitorial service” to clean a building. What in fact happened was that the EPA which was created by Nixon and had actual regulatory teeth and was responsible for cleaning up some horrifying industrial messes (Cuyahoga River, etc.) was gutted by the Regan administration in their efforts to unburden business. The Bay act has NO penalties and NO deadlines for noncompliance. It just suggests that everybody do the right thing. It CERTAINLY was not some act that paid “environmentalists” to clean up the Bay. This is just plain crazy. Environmentalists have done the best they can to raise public awareness about the dire state of the Bay, but NO small group can just “clean up” the Bay. Suggesting such shows complete ignorance of the Bay, its enormous watershed and the problems it faces. ANYONE with ANY experience on these waters knows that the Bay is a shadow of its former self. The trouble with it is that it still looks pretty on the surface and it doesn’t stink of pollution…if the waterfront view is not spoiled then I guess the thinking is “Who cares?“
In the private sector if one hired a janitorial firm to clean a property and after 1 month the property was dirtier, I doubt that firm would still be employed.
What has happened to all of the taxpayers money that these so called environmental groups benefited from for over a quarter decade?
Much like ACORN; cut them all off.
26 years with no positive results should tell people the bay act is a joke and is doing nothing to save the bay but does plenty to prevent land owners from developing their property as they see fit
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement