Hearing on school-budget cuts tonight

» 2 Comments | Post a Comment

PDF: Impact

PDF: What's left

The Chesterfield County School Board will hold a public hearing tonight on the proposed budget, which includes $52 million in cuts.

The $551.5 million 2009-10 spending plan would eliminate 525 positions and funding for various school programs and operations.

Other school systems, such as Richmond and Hanover County, are facing deep cuts to their budgets.

Brent Thomas, principal at Chester Middle School, said one of the biggest effects would be the loss of his administrative assistant. That position has been proposed for elimination in all middle schools.

"Administrative duties, including student discipline, will be split between only two of us, where this year we have three administrators," he said. "That will have ripple effects, as some things will simply not get done while we try to keep up with immediate, urgent issues."

Principals also are concerned about larger classes because it may affect teaching quality.

"Having larger class sizes complicates everything the teacher tries to accomplish, from keeping order in a crowded classroom so that learning can occur to addressing individual needs to scheduling parent conferences," said Matoaca Middle School's principal, Carla V. Mathews.

Donald Ashburn, principal of Carver Middle School, said he feels bad for the people who would lose their jobs, including his administrative assistant and two teachers. He also said core classes at his school are small and an increase of one or two students per classroom won't be noticed.



Contact Juan Antonio Lizama at (804) 649-6513 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: chesterfield county,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by concerned on February 10, 2009 at 10:11 pm

I agree with Dave that class size makes little difference. I went to school in the 60’s and 70’s and, while things were not perfect even back then, we had larger class sizes than you see in CCPS. The difference is that more kids are not learning to read in K-2. They are frustrated because these kids know that they are bright kids and have the ability to read. Because schools refuse to use PEER-REVIEWED, research-based reading instruction as defined by Reading First and NCLB (it’s also called phonics by us old-timers) but instead use whole-language (now hiding behind a new fancy term called balanced literacy which does have about 3% phonics included only if teachers feel like including that part). Even though, everyone knows that children learn to read, decode, when they are taught the “code”, schools continue fail to teach kids to read but instead teach them to memorize a few words and “guess” at the rest or “look at the pictures to figure it out”. Almost all children enter Kindergarten wanting to learn to read but public schools destroy this thirst and motivation by making them feel “dumb”. The lamp is extinquished at an early age. So what do kids do to pass the time?  They cut up through the rest of their school careers. They bully others. They are bored to tears and can’t sit still. They get angry and frustrated. They want to learn but reading is the gateway to all other subjects, all other learning. If they could read, they would be kept too busy in school working, reading, learning, writing, doing math, and would have no time to get into trouble.

So why are we pouring more dollars into a faulty system? 

From Joel Turtel’s book, Public Schools, Public Menace a good illustration he gives it this. Suppose you take horseback riding lessons, and you pay for one-on-one instruction but the teacher teaches you to ride by making you sit on the horse facing backwards and tells you to hold onto the horse’s tail, and ride backwards. Will you learn to ride the horse this way? You are getting 1:1 instruction. Class size makes no difference if your methods are ineffective!

It’s all about keeping funding, even if it’s a waste of taxpayer dollars.

It’s government bureaucracy. Government shouldn’t be in the business of educating children just like they shouldn’t be in the business of doing anything that can be done in the private sector.

Just my opinion..

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on February 10, 2009 at 7:35 am

If Ms. Mathews is concerned about classroom order and discipline, then she and other administrators might pitch in and support teachers who try to keep order in their classrooms. If students know that misbehavior has consequences and that the principal will back the teacher, then a lot of problems disappear. I once taught classes with 30-35 kids, but seldom had trouble because I had administrators who supported my authority to keep order in my room. Class size doesn’t matter so much as the will of leadership to do the hard things to keep order in a building.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement