Lowballed appraisals causing frustration
Published: July 4, 2009
WASHINGTON It's by far the hottest controversy in real estate this summer, and it could directly affect the value of your house -- probably negatively -- by tens of thousands of dollars.
The issue concerns lowballed valuations and the new rules guiding appraisers in pricedepressed and in rebounding markets. Consider these snapshots of what's going on:
- In San Diego, Steve Doyle, division president for Brookfield Homes, is trying to close out the final 20 houses of a 120-unit singlefamily subdivision. Prices range from $340,000 to $350,000. But recently there has been a major hitch: Appraisers assigned by banks are coming in with valuations $60,000 or more below Doyle's selling prices. The appraisers, who Doyle says are unfamiliar with local market trends, inexperienced or both, are using distressed sales -- foreclosures and short sales of existing houses -- as their "comparables." Some of the distressed properties are in poor condition, and all of them offer fewer amenities, according to Doyle.
- In Wilmington, N.C., a loan applicant with a house in excellent condition, and an unblemished payment record, sought to refinance into a 4.75 percent mortgage. She had purchased the property four years ago for $160,000 and made about $20,000 worth of improvements. Her loan application, according to Paul Skeens, president of Colonial Mortgage Group of Waldorf, Md., was "a slam dunk. Nothing to it." The house was worth $180,000 to $200,000, according to a local realty estimate.
But when an appraiser with little local knowledge was sent in by a bank to value the house, he chose two short-sale properties that had both closed in the mid-$140,000 range, and one inheritance sale around $155,000. The last property was "in horrible condition," said Skeens. "I'd call it dog meat." The dealparalyzing appraised value that came in for the cream-puff refi: $149,000.
- In the suburbs near Cleveland, Enzo Perfetto, manager of Enzoco Homes, builds custom houses on clients' lots. Recently, according to Perfetto, banks have begun assigning appraisers from far outside the area to value lots as part of mortgage packages on new homes. Some of the comparables they use are foreclosure situations, and that depresses land valuations. A young couple who paid $75,000 for their lot recently had it valued at just $30,000 by an outof-area appraiser who only looked at online data, according to Perfetto -- discouraging the young couple from proceeding.
"I think the pendulum is swinging way too far in the wrong direction on appraisals," Perfetto said. Bank-assigned appraisers often "don't know the local market, and they're going for low numbers to be 'safe.'"
Complaints about lowballed appraisals -- from builders, realty agents, consumers and mortgage companies -- have erupted since May 1, when government-sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac put their new appraisal rules into effect nationwide. Critics charge the new system is fostering the use of appraisers willing to work for low fees -- sometimes 50 percent below previous standards -- and who are willing to conduct home appraisals far outside their typical areas of activity.
The Fannie-Freddie system -- known as the Home Valuation Code of Conduct -- is complicated by the fact that it is a byproduct of a legal settlement in 2008 between New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo and the two government-sponsored mortgage investors.
Under the code, appraisers are now routinely assigned by appraisal management companies rather than being selected by local mortgage companies or loan officers. The management companies pocket as much as 40 percent to 50 percent of the appraisal fee paid by the consumer.
Frustration with the new system boiled over and made its way to Capitol Hill late last month. The National Association of Home Builders called for an immediate change in the rules governing the use of foreclosures, short sales and other distress transactions as comparables for appraisals on nondistressed, typical homes, whether new or resale.
Two U.S. representatives -- Travis W. Childers, D-Miss., and Gary G. Miller, R-Calif. -- have introduced legislation calling for an 18-month moratorium on the appraisal code. In identical letters to James B. Lockhart, the top regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and Cuomo, the National Association of Realtors also requested a moratorium and complained that the code is raising consumers' costs, distorting property values and killing sales.
Asked for comment, Lockhart said through a spokesperson that his agency is "monitoring" the situation, and considers "the views of market participants important."
Bottom line: Be aware of the issue. It affects your equity, even if you're not currently buying or selling. And watch whether Congress fixes the problem.
Write to Kenneth R. Harney at the Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071, or e-mail
. Harney heads his own consulting firm in Chevy Chase, Md.
Reader Reactions
CWB717 , You are right. If you throw in the automotive dealers you have them all. Newspaper is not for the people it is for the biggest spenders.Look at the car ads and see if you can find a private seller amongst all the overwhelming dealer pictures and ads. Same with the real estate ads. They own the newspaper. Good thing there is Craig’s List for average people to advertise.
You ever notice how much space in the RTD is devoted to stories with positive slants towards real estate developers? The crime section may cover a few recent crimes, while the rest of the paper is full of puff pieces about how Richmond is one of the best places to start over, or how many wonderful opportunities are here, or how Rocketts Landing is getting some retail space filled, or how somebody in a non-official setting mentions the worlds “ballpark” and “south James” (in other words hearsay). The RTD makes itself a difficult “news source” to trust when it seems half their “stories” are basically cheerleading for land and real estate developers. How much empty retail and living space is in Richmond, I can’t recall the exact numbers, but it is pretty high. Yet the RTD continues to push articles about further development. You get better, more in depth news from a free weekly, namely Style.
Might I add, the reader comments are spot-on, every one. There’s far more horse sense in the general population than there is in the media, the government, or corporate America (which owns the other two, after all).
So…. housing developers, real-estate agents, and mortgage brokers are complaining that their gravy trains have been interrupted? Cry me a river.
Three classes of people, among many others, who should be put to hard labor for what they’ve done to this country.
This particular bit of industry-sourced agitprop is a disgrace to the Post and the RTD for reprinting it.
God, would somebody get these people a tissue? We are in a slumping housing market, plain and simple. Going back over the past 30 years, wages have stagnated, while housing costs have grossly been over inflated. In the late seventies you could expect to but a house at a price that was two to three times your yearly middle class salary in a half way decent neighborhood. Now that ratio has increased to five to six times. Home building methods have really not changed all that much in that time, at least not enough to justify that kind of increase. It leaves the question, who stands to gain from this trend? Answer, localities when they collect property tax, and developers who sell the homes. Often times it is impossible to distinguish between county boards and the developers themselves, in other words collusion.
I live in a house built in 1958. It has been taxed beyond it’s original value many times over. It will never be paid for. Income tax, military service, food tax, personal property tax, gas tax,tobacco tax, tax on phones, increased tax on everything is never enough. Celebration on the fourth? For what? Unemployment reaching the rediculous numbers of rediculous taxing? Bang bang, we’re dead.
The maxim used to be: you don’t want to own the most expensive house in your neighborhood. During the housing bubble, everyone forgot it. From an appraiser’s point of view, the least desirable house sets the baseline. Location. Location. Location.
This is sort of a “puff piece” for the Realtors. The last sentence had me laughing! Congress…...really!!!
The new appraisers are right in their pricing.Do we want another billion dollar bail out? Houses are only worth what someone is willing to pay.If a house is under appraised value the seller can lower the price or buyer can come up with the cash difference. Why were the old appraisers and realty companies not tried criminally for fixing the value too high leading to a housing meltdown.
Odd no one complained when appraisals were grossly inflated to the high side. Face facts, the national game of use your home as an ATM is over.
Why should not an unbiased outside appraiser be used to determine valuations? The former practice of mortgage brokers selecting appraisers reeked of collusion, corruption and bribery.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement