Splinters appear in health overhaul
Published: July 19, 2009
WASHINGTON -- Months of relative cooperation among disparate interest groups in the heath-care reform debate appear to be coming to an end.
Friendly alliances among medical and business groups have begun to splinter in reaction to concrete legislation from House Democrats, which cleared two important committee hurdles Friday.
The House bill aims to cover 97 percent of Americans by 2015, in part through a sliding surtax on household incomes exceeding $350,000. The proposal also includes a public insurance option. It is strongly opposed by Republicans, many conservative Democrats and major insurers, and it faces difficult prospects in the Senate.
The Democratic National Committee this week began running cable television ads targeting many of the party's wavering senators, declaring that "it's time for health-care reform."
The DNC, acting through its Organizing for America grass-roots project, has also ramped up a nationwide schedule of meetings and rallies.
The Republican National Committee this week launched a BarackObamaExperiment.com Web site, which urges supporters to write their representatives in opposition to Democratic proposals.
Hundreds of conservatives gathered around the country Friday for health-care protests. More than 200 people marched outside the office of Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., in Richmond. In Chesterfield County, an estimated 300 gathered outside the local office of Sen. Mark R. Warner, D-Va.
The protests were organized by Tea Party Patriots, a group that got its start this year during protests over federal bailouts of Wall Street firms.
The political climate has changed notably from May, when President Barack Obama stood with half a dozen health-industry trade groups that had pledged to come up with $2 trillion in savings over the next decade.
But with several pieces of legislation written, interest groups have begun taking sides. Richard Kirsch, Health Care for America Now's national campaign manager, said that "things are heating up, because there are actual bills out there."
He added: "It's not just a concept anymore."
In his weekly address yesterday, Obama said, "I will not sign on to any health plan that adds to our deficits over the next decade." It was the sixth consecutive day Obama sought to keep the focus on his chief domestic priority in the face of mounting resistance.
However, a new analysis by the Congressional Budget Office said the House legislation would increase deficits by $239 billion over a decade.
Reader Reactions
In his weekly address yesterday, Obama said, “I will not sign on to any health plan that adds to our deficits over the next decade.“
“However, a new analysis by the Congressional Budget Office said the House legislation would increase deficits by $239 billion over a decade.“
So how long do you think it will take him to declare the CBO is wrong or a new CBO report will come out saying that these bills will save money? No government program has ever saved money when it was forced through against opposition. Will all people who must vote on this proposal get a chance to actually read and comprehend this bill prior to acting on it. I think not.
Focusing too much attention on the House plan is a waste of time. The House Democrat plan is the left-most goal post in this exercise, just as the Senate Health Committee plan is the right goal post. The final plan will be somewhere down the middle and will come out of the Senate Finance Committee.
This is the period when conservatives can take shots at the House plan for being too radical while liberals complain the the Senate plan is to tepid.
It’s all part of our lobby-tative form of democracy.
Responsible citizens must demand that the glaring deficiencies, fraud and abuse, and gross inefficiencies in the Federal Government’s handling of Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans’ Medical System, and Military Hospitals be remedied BEFORE allow the Federal Government additional entry into the health care system.
I am on board with the two ideas, the one suggested by the President Obama: Based on a new report that details how much waste and inefficiency there is in medicare, how best practices are not always used, how many billions of dollars could be saved, the independent groups of doctors and medical experts to oversee long-term cost saving measures every year force congress to make sure that they are acting on these recommendations to bend the cost curve each and every year.
The other idea echoed by New York Times;
“Meanwhile, it will be important to get some guaranteed fast savings from the health care industries by cutting and reallocating hundreds of billions of dollars from projected spending on Medicare and Medicaid…Just to be sure, Congress ought to establish a fail-safe mechanism that could impose additional cuts after a few years if savings are less than projected.“
I agree that In the near-term, this type of accountability will ensure that health reform legislation is fiscally responsible and fully financed. In the long-term, it will make certain that the health system, especially Medicare, is sustainable for generations to come. Please visit http://www.newamerica.net/blog/new-health-dialogue/2009/health-reform-finding-trigger-points-controlling-costs-13089 for further details.
Thank You !
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement