UPDATE: Health bill vote could be tomorrow or Sunday
Published: November 6, 2009
Updated: November 6, 2009
WASHINGTON— Democrats in the House of Representatives are scrambling to secure enough support to pass President Barack Obama’s historic health overhaul initiative, working to soothe last-minute concerns from rank-and-file Democrats ahead of a make-or-break vote.
Voting is set for Saturday on the 10-year, $1.2 trillion legislation that embraces Obama’s goals of extending health coverage to tens of millions of uninsured Americans and putting tough new restrictions on insurance companies. But House leaders said Friday the vote could be pushed back a day or more.
Obama was set to make a personal appeal to the Democratic rank and file in a visit to Capitol Hill Friday. That was called off late Thursday after the shootings at Fort Hood, Texas, and rescheduled for Saturday.
The House effort picked up two major endorsements Thursday, from the powerful seniors’ lobby AARP and the American Medical Association.
Action on health legislation was slowed in the Senate as lawmakers waited for the Congressional Budget Office to weigh in on a bill written by Majority Leader Harry Reid in consultation with the White House and key committee chairmen. Senate votes could be pushed back until next year, but in the House Democratic leaders pressed forward.
They expressed optimism that when it came time to vote, they would have the majority needed to prevail in the 435-seat House.
Asked Thursday if she had the votes, the House leader, Speaker Nancy, Pelosi replied: “We will.“
Whatever legislation eventually passes in the House will have to be reconciled with the Senate’s measure so passage of a comprehensive health care bill is still months away and could still falter.
Pelosi and other Democratic leaders were finalizing language to bar federal funding of abortion and resolving a flare-up over the treatment of illegal immigrants in the legislation that had Hispanic lawmakers up in arms.
Members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus object to a provision in the Senate legislation — backed by the White House — that bars illegal immigrants from buying health insurance within a proposed new marketplace, or exchange, even if they use their own money to buy from private companies.
Illegal immigrants can buy private health insurance now, so some lawmakers say the White House position goes too far. The House bill doesn’t have that language, and several members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus met with Obama at the White House on Thursday to tell him that if that changed, he could lose as many as 20 votes.
“I think that he got our message,“ Democratic Rep. Nydia Velazquez, head of the Hispanic Caucus, said afterward.
House leaders said that, in keeping with the Hispanic Caucus’ demands, there was not likely to be any prohibition added to the House bill against illegal immigrants shopping in the exchange.
Democrats were trying to toughen prohibitions in the bill against federal funding for abortions in a way that would satisfy enough anti-abortion Democrats. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops was involved in the talks and a resolution appeared within reach late Thursday.
The bill would cover 96 percent of Americans, providing government subsidies beginning in 2013 to extend coverage to millions who now lack it. Self-employed people and small businesses could buy coverage through the new exchanges, either from a private insurer or a new government plan that would compete. All the plans sold through the exchange would have to follow basic consumer protection rules.
For the first time, almost all individuals would be required to purchase insurance or pay a fine, and employers would be required to insure their employees. Insurance companies would be barred from denying coverage to people with pre-existing medical conditions or charging much higher rates to older people.
___
Associated Press writers David Espo and Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar contributed to this report.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Has anyone asked Senators Webb and Warner if they are going to voluntarily opt out of their lavish Congressional health care that is provided for Congressman for life so they can be bound by the same rules, regulations and taxes that you and I will be?
Can someone from the Webb and Warner staffs please let us know.
“For the first time, almost all individuals would be required to purchase insurance or pay a fine”
I heard on the news that some Republican Congressman is going to challenge this on the grounds that it is unconstitutional to force American citizens to buy something that they may not want. Sounds sensible to me. It’s like the government forcing you to buy gas when you don’t own a car.
Besides all that, these are the same people who can’t even get the H1N1 vaccination out to us and they want to control the entire medical system. God help us all!!!!
But, all they have to do is say “It’s free” and you have your usual suspects (liberals, democrats, deadbeats…ah, but I’m being redundant) chomping at the bits to get in on piece of that “free” action.
I understand that there’s a cranky clause in the healthcare bill that addresses some of the sand that you’ve accrued…
“Posted by drhoagie on November 06, 2009 at 8:17 am
The Pelosi Bill is evolving and being changed hourly. How can a bill that was changed last evening have been on line for 7 days?
Do you know something about time travel that we do not Captain Spock?“
Maybe he is Mr. Peabody with his Wayback machine. But since it is still be modified, when or “whenbacK” is he going to go?
The Pelosi Bill is evolving and being changed hourly. How can a bill that was changed last evening have been on line for 7 days?
Do you know something about time travel that we do not Captain Spock?
IMHO
Basic problems with the bill.
Progressives lie about the effect, not just the 72 hours to review which is of course par for the course.
First, doesn’t cut costs for majority of americans, in fact over the short term it will raise costs. Only “costs” being cut is government payment for Medicate. And that was the promise government made in 1964, and is now saying uh oh.. That underpayment of the real costs (amounts charged by docs and hospitals gets transferred to the group policies that most companies provide to their employees, which raises premiums for the employees (the majority of people).
Insurance companies aren’t the bad guy either. The bad guy is the government itself is. Here we are again promising good times ahead if only we make someone else pay for it.
That’s the essence of the entire bill. Get someone else to pick up the promises that government hasn’t kept in the last 40 years with Medicare and the last 70 with Social Secutity.
SO for those in favor of the bill, if you want someone else to pay for you, why don’t you just accept that it is what you are doing.
We the people, are the government, but we should not allow the government to pull money outof some of our pockets, to line theirs with power, control, and put just a little bit in the other guys pocket
The dopey AARP jumps on board with Obama against the sea of members who reject it.
The bill allegedly provides coverage for those without coverage. As long as you wait 6 months.
For the elderly, no longer productive AARP dues paying member, that means when he is diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, he must wait 6 months for treatment. Just enough time for that unproductive worker to slip into a rapid decline in health so treatment will not be necessary.
The bill does provide for a Death Panel consultant to usher that AARP dues paying member into hospice so he can die and open up a bed for a younger, more valuable member of the workforce.
Any member of AARP should be flooding their phone banks and dropping their membership today.
drhoagie,
The bill has been on the House website since Friday. By my count, that’s 7 days.
Nancy Pelosi pledged to allow The People (you and I) 72 hours to read the bill before a vote.
She lied (again). This bill is being rushed through without time for public scrutiny.
If this bill is so historical and magnanimous, why not march it around Washington for all to see? Why vote in the dark of night on a weekend when most Americans are not engaged in the news?
Who wouldn’t want to sign such a humanitarian bill on a weekday so they could bask in the glory of wall to wall news coverage?
Why?
Anon, unless a post has been deleted, dkb123 stated none of what you infer.
Indeed, the bill has been read, analyzed and digested already - but not by any member of congress who will be voting on it (malfeasance? Incompetence? Fraud?).
Things like having to wait 6 months for coverage for those with terminal illnesses, taxing everyone to pay for it (oh yes!). Denial of retention of current coverage.
Yes, some have read it, but not the clowns that will be imposing it - but not imposed upon by it.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement