President says private, public sectors must create jobs

» 65 Comments | Post a Comment

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama says the public and private sectors must find more ways to create jobs to continue the U.S. climb out of an economic recession.

Obama said Monday the economy has pulled back “from the brink” but still has a long way to go. He said job losses will continue for weeks and months to come and called for bold, innovative action by his administration, Congress and the private sector to create more good-paying jobs.

Obama made the remarks at the start of a White House meeting with economic advisers. The session was open to reporters and streamed live on the White House Web site.

Advertisement

 
View More: obama,latest news,economy,economic stimulus,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by VaResident on November 04, 2009 at 12:56 pm

BO should be kissing up to the private sector cause he will be job hunting soon, very soon.

Flag Comment Posted by Blackbird on November 04, 2009 at 12:42 pm

Actually, 12step
I have heard that G. Bush and Republicans have driven up the deficit on purpose.  I don’t say that out of rage or hatred.  I just listened to Forrest Sawyer’s (from FRONTLINE)special “Ten Trillion and Counting”.
He brought up a point I had heard mentioned before, but I thought I would share it.
The point he brought up is that Republicans drove up the deficit to “crowd” out entitlement spending.
In otherwords, cut taxes, so that the Gov’t goes into debt and is forced to cut programs. The first programs that go to the chopping block are entitlements. 
This does answer alot of the reasons why G. Bush cut taxes during war time.
I mean how do you expect to pay for a war without taxes?  I think WARS have been the main reason countries resort to TAXES.
How do you pay for Capitalism out of control?  Unfortunately, bail them out, wipe the slate clean, and tax the heck out of people to pay it back.  I really wish G. Bush’s term didn’t end when it did, so he could have dealt with the bailout problems in a Republican accepted way. Then we could be talking about real issues of “change” instead of this stupid Bailout Nation stuff.  It’s hard for me to defend, really.  But like I said we were on the verge of a real meltdown, you are all trying to minimize right now.  You seem to think this stimulus was Obama’s secret strategy from 4 years ago, like the financial crisis was all created by Democrats so they could pass this huge stimulus.  I really wonder what McCain would have done differently, with a Democratically controlled Congress.
I am sure we would have a similar discussion going on.  No, we’d probably be talking about Sarah Palin right now.

Flag Comment Posted by 12steprevenge on November 04, 2009 at 12:06 pm

“You may think I’m crazy, but I think he is INTENTIONALLY trying to run up so much debt for our kids and grandkids that the US economy may never recover to what it was or could be.“

Yup, I think it IS crazy to hold that belief. How a reasonable person could conceive that the President of the United States is INTENTIONALLY trying to create financial insolvency with the goal of destroying our country is beyond me.

Note the qualifier of “reasonable”. I’d say the same thing about anyone who said the same thing about GWB, too. What I really think? Many people are blinded by their hatred, to the point of absurdity.

Flag Comment Posted by ProudAmerican24 on November 04, 2009 at 10:52 am

mrright, you need to change your name to “mrALWAYSright.“  Well said my friend.  The sad part is none of the Obama-bots understand what is happening.

Flag Comment Posted by mrright on November 04, 2009 at 9:42 am

Blackbird….I don’t pretend to have all the answers.But I didn’t think TARP was a good idea.It went against capitalism, where like Godfather says if you don’t make a profit you fail.
If I don’t ‘make a profit’ I fail.So do you.
Would the sky have fallen if AIG didn’t get the bailout?Would AIG have failed of it weren’t for government programs like CRA that facilitated disaster?None of us know.
It seems to me like the government(Bush, McCain, AND Obama included)
used taxpayer dollars to cause the problem and then tax payer dollars to fix the problem.Me and you are screwed either way.
I don’t just blindly dislike Obama or his policies.I gave him a chance.But I don’t like his arrogance and I don’t believe he’s doing what he thinks is best for this country over the long haul.
You may think I’m crazy, but I think he is INTENTIONALLY trying to run up so much debt for our kids and grandkids that the US economy may never recover to what it was or could be.
I think/hope last nites elections slowed down the process a little.
One thing ALL politicins are good at is spending other peoples money.I want them ALL to be more thoughtful about what they do with my tax dollar.
In closing, this quote from Margaret Thatcher:
‘The one bad thing about Socialism is EVENTUALLY you run out of other peoples money.‘
How true,how true.
Thanks, Blackbird.Have a nice day!

Flag Comment Posted by Blackbird on November 03, 2009 at 11:38 pm

“Eight major banks which were at the front of the line for government bailouts have already set aside $117.6 billion this year to pay employees, almost as much as they paid in all of 2008, a Reuters analysis has found.

If the banks continued that pace, they would far surpass what they paid in 2008 though fall short of the watershed paydays of 2007, when the financial sector was still booming, the analysis found.

The pay offered by top banks reflects the dramatic rebound at some of them, but also shows that industry conditions have not quite been restored to 2007 levels —before the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the fire sale of Bear Stearns, industry analysts said.“
http://www.cnbc.com/id/33606192

Doesn’t this just burn you….now who do you blame?  Or this is a good sign of recovery? At least the banks are still there? Right?
It is such a mixed signal.
One thing for sure it just makes people mad…all sides. Right?  Obama get no credit for saving banks and all the blame ...it really is a tough position to be in, you have to admit.
The Banks aren’t helping matter are they? Any sign of fiscal responsibility there?

Flag Comment Posted by Blackbird on November 03, 2009 at 11:30 pm

mr right
I don’t think “They’re literally afraid of the confiscatory tax rates that will be required to financially support all these goverment programs Obama is pushing from goverment run healthcare to the bailouts, Cash for Clunkers, Cap and trade, etc.“

Actually I can’t speak for anyone but myself. I am not afraid of Obama’s policies, I am afraid for his life though.  My whole problem with the argument of business taxation is that it seems to be a “cure” all.
While I don’t agree with gov’t waste and over spending, earmarks and all that junk, I do think Obama had to do something and do it QUICK. I think it could have been done MUCH MUCH better and with bi-partisan support. I was VERY disappointed the way it went down. So yes, maybe you are right in some repects, but there are alot of people in gov’t on the other side of the aisle that refuse to accept the consequences of the lost Presidential election, they are acting the same as they have for years…in other words pre-bail out…they don’t seem to realize how close we came to complete financial collapse. Now, that things are stabilized they refuse to give any credit to the quick efforts that Obama did.  Those are seen in such negative light that it is really casting a huge shadow over our country. This is part Obama’s fault, but it part of the “radical anti-Obama dislike everything he does” campaign that has been very successful. You seem to believe in it as well, so you see it works…
I like to cut through the BS, and as I see it, Obama’s rotten misquided stimulus saved the country from ruin. I say this because my ATM card still works, my credit cards still charge, I see have bills to pay, I still can get gas at the gas station and buy food at the grocery store.
It’s time to give him credit for that and quit being so negative. Sorry, I just see alot of this “other” stuff as necessary growing pains for the country. We NEED to improve Health Care to free up our companies and allow them to compete with the rest of the world that DOES have gov’t health care.(GM is a PRIME EXAMPLE!)  We NEED to get off OIL. Our country has about 8 years supply of Oil left at current reported reserves and depletion rates.
The entire world together has 54 years of Oil reserves, of course they will find more, but how much more?
So when do we start to deal with the situation?
We need to improve opportunities for ALL Americans and that starts with better education. These are the reasons I voted for Obama, and I still support these ideas, although I am not 100% impressed with his approach. I think he has fallen into a lot of right wing traps too easily…the first one being a “tax and spend” liberal for passing such a large Stimulus so quickly and agressively, but like I said early it HAD TO BE DONE, whether it was him or John McCain , the President of the United States had to take action, and he did his duty. How well he did it can be debated, but it’s purpose “to save the US financial system and restore some stability” succeed. It is now seen as a small success, but at the time it was a life saver. Maybe history will judge it differently, but when do we start to deal with these problems? I would rather have not had a financial meltdown, just like G. Bush would rather have not had 9/11, but that doesn’t change the fact that we much evolve or die….ok we might not die…but we will loose our leadership role.
check this chart for Oil information
http://timriley.net/oil.pdf

Flag Comment Posted by mrright on November 03, 2009 at 10:34 pm

Blackbird..your grammar was perfect,its just that I’m thinking,
‘Why doesn’t the GOVERNMENT lower its prices, give us CITIZENS a tax cut, and let us spend and save more of our own money.‘
I know I’ve lowered my prices more than 1.3% and it hasn’t really helped.
I can’t properly explain the psychology behind a robust economy, but I do no it has alot to do with consumer confidence, which is low right now.
I don’t think people are afraid of JC Penneys charging them too much for a pair of slacks or Ukrops charging too much for a loaf of bread or a steak.They’re literally afraid of the confiscatory tax rates that will be required to financially support all these goverment programs Obama is pushing from goverment run healthcare to the bailouts, Cash for Clunkers, Cap and trade, etc.
Its just the age old debate,Blackbird.
Pro-business vs pro-goverment.
I think the proof is all around that Obama’s pro-government approach isn’t working .
I also think it took alot of nerve on Obama’s part after spending nearly a trillion taxpayer dollars on the stimulus, he now tells us its up to private business to fix the economy.
What a guy.
Would you be surprised to know I want my money back?

Flag Comment Posted by Blackbird on November 03, 2009 at 10:20 pm

QuestGov
“Until we begin to elect statemen rather than career partisan, self-serving, political operatives, the US will regrettably continue its economic decline and become increasingly subservient to the will of foreign governments who buy our debt”

I can agree with you there!

But again, I don’t get your immediate criticism of gov’t and the bail outs.

“Ill-conceived bail-outs whereby millions of dollars of deficit spending were created to give taxpayer money to failed businesses seem only to have prolonged the “death process” for most of those businesses - AIG, GM, and Chrysler, in particular “

It would have “ill conceived” to let these companies fail over night. Prolonging their death has actually allowed the more timely and orderly “death” of these companies then a quick bankruptcy would have, especially in AIG. My understanding of the AIG case, allowing them to fail would have been really, really bad.
Alot worse then watching them host lavish parties on tax payer dollars.
IF it wasn’t for the AIG bailout, I think we all might be hiding our money under our bed and guarding our doors with shotguns if the money was still worth anything at all.
So, again I state…do you blame the Gov’t for the AIG failure? Or the AIG Bailout…because they really are two sides of the coin. In one case the Gov’t would be seen as the villian, and the later the hero. I see the gov’t as the last standing hero in a room full of shameful greedy CEO’s who have drained and taken advantage of this country’s good will for their own gains.  It is THEM who I blame for the lack of confidence in the economy right now. Not the Gov’t.  Although I don’t think the Gov’t is riding a white horse and dressed in white, I think it is more of a conflicted hero, like Clint Eastwood type…“Dirty Harry” or something.

Flag Comment Posted by Blackbird on November 03, 2009 at 10:05 pm

mr.right
“Blackbird ,you said “So why don’t businesses LOWER PRICES…give us consumers a TAX CUT, let us save or spend more of OUR MONEY.“
You didn’t mean to say that.Did you?“

Yeah, I guess I did, I don’t know if it makes gramatical sense, I was saying if stores etc, would lower their prices, that would give consumers more buying power and more incentive to spend?
Is there something wrong with that?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
Times-Dispatch Shop
 

Advertisement