CUTTING CARBON: House Bill Will Help the Environment and the Economy
Published: June 14, 2009
As we all recognize, our environment is in danger, our climate at risk, and the health of our Earth perilous. We must take steps to remedy this situation for our children and grandchildren.
In many ways, no issue could be more important, more imperative, or timelier. We are at a crossroads. If we do not take stewardship of our Earth and all vitality on it, we may never again have the opportunity. We owe it to our children and grandchildren.
That is why this year, I introduced legislation, in conjunction with the recommendations of Gov. Tim Kaine's Climate Commission, to mandate greater energy efficiency and to reduce our greenhouse gases.
However, global warming is not an issue we can address on just a state level. The United States is one of the largest emitters of greenhouse gases and, therefore, needs to take decisive action at the national level to have a serious impact on climate change. Fortunately, on May 21, the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES). This historic vote moves us one step closer to a clean energy future.
The ACES Act will cut the carbon emissions that cause global warming 80 percent by 2050, a significant accomplishment necessary to preserve our planet for future generations. Moreover, the legislation mandates an increase in energy efficiency and use of renewable energy. For perhaps the first time, we are taking significant steps to acknowledge and address the climate and energy crises.
In these perilous economic times, some have said that we can't afford to invest in clean energy or spend precious resources to reduce greenhouse gases. Quite the opposite is true. By making this investment, we will ensure strong growth in clean-energy industries and create clean-energy, or green, jobs, which will help address both our environmental and economic predicaments.
This legislation will be a critical component to rebuild and renew our economy with millions of these new green jobs. It will revitalize the manufacturing sector, create the industries of tomorrow, reduce our dependence on oil, all while addressing global warming.
These novel jobs -- building wind turbines, installing solar panels, renovating buildings to make them more energy efficient, constructing the Smart Grid -- are jobs that can't be outsourced. Right here in Richmond, we already have new green jobs because of stimulus funds that are providing money to weatherize homes. This is an excellent example of how improving the environment can also fix the economy.
If we fail to act, hundreds of billions of dollars will continue to be shipped overseas to hostile foreign regimes to pay for dirty energy that America can no longer afford nor wants. This legislation can break the cycle of dependence on Mideast oil and, instead, repower America with clean, homegrown energy, perhaps wind energy from right off Virginia's coast.
This bill is an excellent beginning, but more can and should be done.
As this legislation moves forward, it ought to be strengthened to further reduce greenhouse gas emissions faster. Environmental professionals and scientists have recommended an increased reduction in these emissions over the next 10 years. This bill should be amended to reflect their findings.
In addition, the legislation should insist on a higher percentage of our energy coming from renewables and, simultaneously, requiring more efficient energy production. This would then shift American energy toward cleaner, cheaper sources like wind and solar power much more quickly. The legislation should also retain Environmental Protection Agency authority to ensure that the reductions are achieved in a timely fashion to prevent the worsening of global warming.
Finally, the ACES Act should require the largest emitters of greenhouse gases to pay for their carbon pollution. Then these funds can be directed to providing clean energy, protecting consumers, and preserving wildlife and other natural resources.
Our Congress must pass strong, comprehensive energy and climate legislation like ACES. We must dramatically expedite America's transition to cleaner, cheaper energy sources, slash energy waste to reduce global warming quickly and cheaply, close pollution loopholes, and make polluters pay. By doing this, we also will achieve our critical goals of jump-starting the economy, reducing global warming, and transitioning to clean homegrown energy.
I encourage Virginians to write to their representatives and senators to encourage them to support this ACES legislation and then to ensure that its final passage makes it even stronger and more effective.
Donald McEachin, a Democrat, represents the 9th District in the Virginia Senate. His district includes Charles City and parts of Richmond and Henrico. Contact him at
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
“As we all recognize, our environment is in danger, our climate at risk, and the health of the Earth perilous.“
We all do not “recognize” any such thing.
Fortunately most of us who read the NYT recognize that literary trick.
The ACES Act will NOT cut the carbon emissions by 80 percent by the year 2050. the Kyoto Protocol which has been used in Europe for years has been a dismal failure to say the least.
I see that we are already employing the new terms like “dirty energy” that this administration is introducing to the public lexicon.
We must remember not to use the old cap-and-trade (fill the cap with money and we’ll trade you some of our unused emission credits) now it is to be cap-and-cash-back. Again fill the cap and the cash will flow back to the government via taxes on everything that remotely relates to energy consumption.
Reduction of CO2 emissions will be imperceptible and will have no effect on global warming/climate change/climate crisis/climate catastrophe.
Actually for those who did not get the memo we are to remove global warming from that list.
Reducing air and water pollution has always been crucial and the perception that it is NOT occurring worldwide (with the exception of India and China) should be in the media reportage and as widely read as the scare mongering CO2 is destroying the earth reports.
Look to Europe where many of these proposed policies have been implemented. There are small pockets of success and huge areas of failure.
And all at catastrophic economic cost.
And the unintended consequences have just begun to rear their ugly heads.
There will be much whining and the laying on of the guilt factor in Copenhagen.
I am afraid that this administration with its penchent for apology and appeasment will be unable to resist.
Oh well, what’s a few more trillion to “reform” another problem that needed more oversight and reasonable regulation.
Scientists (including the more than 31,000 American scientist who signed the petition debunking man-made global warming) believe that the most we could change the Earth’s temperature, even if we all killed ourselves, would be less than 1 degree by 2050.
In a Sept. 10, 2001 Letter to Editor, Wall Street Journal, Dr. S. Fred Singer—atmospheric physicist, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences at the University of Virginia, and former director of the US Weather Satellite Service – said:
“There is no dispute at all about the fact that even if punctiliously observed, (the Kyoto Protocol) would have an imperceptible effect on future temperatures—one-twentieth of a degree by 2050.“
Are we ready to kill the U.S. economy by increasing taxes and the cost of energy, which will force our remaining companies to close or move to other countries?
The ACES Act (cap and trade) is a scam, a hoax, to further enrich and empower the rich and powerful—Obama and his accomplices (Gore, Soros, Goldman Sachs, Obama’s Chicago Climate Exchange friends, GE, the U.N. etc.)—all at our expense and at the expense of our children and grandchildren.
I completely agree with Senator McEachin. The bill will encourage the creation of a clean economy that will CREATE jobs, not harm the economy.
It is a fool’s delusion to hope that the mass extinction and changing climate of today has nothing to do with anthropogenics, and that we should just stand by and allow it. Of course that’s the easy way out - but we must accept the truth and create a vibrant future for ourselves and generations to come.
Those brainwashed to the point of wanting to destroy the economy to “prevent global warming” are behaving like the most primitive human beings who were duped into believing that human sacrifices would ensure them good weather. Human beings don’t have the power to control climate! And killing the economy will not help the environment. Poor countries can’t protect the environment. Just look at Haiti!
The ACES Act (cap and trade) will cost many of us our businesses. It will cost many of us our jobs. It will cost all of us our freedoms and our future.
More and more scientists and thinking people all over the world are realizing that man-made global warming is a hoax that threatens our future and the future of our children. More than 700 international scientists dissent over man-made global warming claims. They are now more than 13 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media-hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers. http://www.climatechangefraud.com/content/view/3562/218/
Additionally, more than 30,000 American scientists have signed onto a petition that states, “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.“ http://www.petitionproject.org
We pray that honest leaders – both Democrat and Republican - are able to save us from Obama’s criminal ACES Act (cap-and-trade) scam.
No patriotic and informed American can support the ACES Act (cap and trade), based global warming scam, more fraudulent than any Nigerian scam.
Cap and Trade “would be the equivalent of an atomic bomb directed at the U.S. economy—all without any scientific justification,” said famed climatologist Dr. S. Fred Singer. It would significantly increase taxes and the cost of energy, forcing many companies to close, thus increasing unemployment, poverty and dependence.
Cap and trade represents huge taxes and cost increases, which will hurt mostly the poor and the middle class. Cap and trade will give dictatorial powers to Obama and will further enrich his billionaire friends (Gore, Soros, Goldman Sachs, Obama’s Chicago Climate Exchange friends, GE, etc.)—all at our expense and at the expense of our children and grandchildren.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement