Virginian Leads Sensible Climate Change Efforts
Published: June 7, 2009
|
MORE: • The Intractable Flaws of Cap-and-Trade Scheme • Virginian Leads Sensible Climate Change Efforts |
Rep. Rick Boucher has proven time and again that Virginia and the nation's consumers come first. This was again made clear with his recent work on climate change legislation now being considered by the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee.
As a senior member of the committee, Boucher has worked tirelessly to listen to those most interested and affected by the legislation and has been a leader in finding common ground.
He has played a pivotal role, working with committee Chairman Henry Waxman and other leaders to craft climate change proposals that will enable our nation to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 80 percent by 2050 without causing unnecessary economic harm.
The bill being considered by the Waxman committee lays the framework for what could be our nation's most far-reaching environmental legislation.
It leverages a proven cap-and-trade approach, supported by many in business and the environmental community, with a framework designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the lowest possible cost.
It calls for the federal government to set a tough national limit on greenhouse gas pollution that will gradually ratchet down over time.
Most important to Virginians and U.S. consumers, it is designed to avoid dramatic price spikes in coal, oil, natural gas, gasoline, and other carbon-based fuels that have been the foundation of our economy for more than a century.
It also provides strong incentives needed to develop an array of new, cleaner energy and renewable technologies that, over time, will stabilize and help grow our economy.
Boucher balanced the challenges of an effective climate change program with concerns for our customers and priorities to restart our economy. Further work will be needed to strengthen these safeguards.
In particular, the proposed emission targets for 2020 are too aggressive and outpace expected technologies, and the time of transition to a full auction of allowances should be extended.
Boucher agrees that these two elements will greatly control costs without sacrificing environmental gains. Boucher and his talented staff have been at the nexus of this debate.
Passing far-reaching climate change legislation can be done wisely if we stay focused on avoiding unnecessary costs and remain committed to developing clean energy technologies.
We employ thousands of workers and have plans to invest billions over the next five to 10 years on infrastructure to meet the energy demands of our more than 11 million customers. Knowing how climate change will be addressed is essential to ensuring that we are making the best decisions on behalf of our consumers and the environment.
Tom Farrell is chairman, president, and CEO of Dominion Resources. Mike Morris is chairman, president, and CEO of American Electric Power, parent company of Appalachian Power. Jim Rogers is chairman, president, and CEO of Duke Energy.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
No patriotic and informed American can support the global warming/cap and trade scam, more fraudulent than any Nigerian scam.
Cap and trade represents huge taxes and cost increases, which will hurt mostly the poor and the middle class. Cap and trade will give dictatorial powers to Obama and will further enrich his billionaire friends (Gore, Soros, Goldman Sachs, Obama’s Chicago Climate Exchange friends, GE, etc.)—all at our expense and at the expense of our children and grandchildren.
Cap and Trade “would be the equivalent of an atomic bomb directed at the U.S. economy—all without any scientific justification,” said famed climatologist Dr. S. Fred Singer. It would significantly increase taxes and the cost of energy, forcing many companies to close, thus increasing unemployment, poverty and dependence.
Those brainwashed to the point of wanting to destroy the economy to “prevent global warming” are behaving like the most primitive human beings who were duped into believing that human sacrifices would ensure them good weather. Human beings don’t have the power to control climate! And killing the economy will not help the environment. Poor countries can’t protect the environment. Just look at Haiti!
Man-made climate change is a ridiculous hoax. Even the words “climate change”—chosen to continue fooling people after everyone realized the earth was not warming—are ridiculous. By its very nature, climate changes.
And it’s even more ridiculous to claim that humans are responsible for climate change! It’s like saying “Wet Rain” and then blaming humans for the rain being wet!
The premise of cap and trade—that CO2 drives global warming—is based on United Nations’ climate reports that are tainted by politics and agenda. The reports don’t pass the smell test—see http://www.energyplanusa.com . Plus, there’s been a lot of new climate discoveries since the UN’s 1997 Kyoto Protocol that are largely omitted from the reports.
America needs our own scientific assessment of global warming. I am a Democrat who for the past 20 years believed global warming was caused by CO2. But now after reading the UN reports I suspect the fix was in. The UN reports contain much good science, but in the end, the UN is a political organization where politics trump science. We need our own objective climate commission to think through global warming and determine whether it’s driven by CO2. ...before we burden our economy with CO2 taxes.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Advertisement