Baseball Stadium Isn’t the Greatest Use for Historic Shockoe
Published: April 12, 2009
Richmond lost its Triple-A baseball team. The future of The Diamond -- located on the Boulevard -- is in question. And a significant amount of Shockoe Bottom remains in decay. Good people want to do something to address all of these issues.
The City of Richmond's government is considering allowing the relocation of a baseball field from The Diamond's site on the Boulevard to a new location. A competent development team is highly motivated to locate it in Shockoe Bottom. What would be the magnitude of the impact of this development on the rest of the city and on the region? What might be the unintended consequences?
Is the primary goal to have a stadium in Shockoe Bottom, or is the primary goal to lure a baseball team back to Richmond? Or perhaps the primary goal is economic development. Where does the region's unique history fit in with any of these options? These are all important issues. The challenge is to prioritize and coordinate the pursuit of each -- in a way that best serves an overall vision for the City of Richmond as the center of a region.
Rather than decide on whether to put a stadium in Shockoe Bottom -- and then plan the rest of the vision for our city -- why not do it the other way around?
Let's back up and attempt to clearly a central vision for Richmond, from which we are able to set individual-issue goals. In the words of Yogi Berra, "If you don't know where you're going, you might not get there."
The 2007 Crupi Report suggested a vision to develop and redevelop Richmond in a way that maximizes the benefit of being located on a river with falls. In addition to riverfront planning, a recommendation was made that the city-owned property on the Boulevard, on which The Diamond is situated, be redeveloped into an office campus similar to Innsbrook or West Creek.
Integrating a new stadium there as well would maximize the efficient use of parking -- office use by day, with baseball and other activities filling the lots at night and on weekends.
Regarding baseball, some facts are not in dispute:
- The Braves left Richmond's outdated baseball stadium, The Diamond, which is located 2.8 miles from Richmond's downtown financial district.
- The Braves have chosen to move to a new stadium in Gwinnett County, Ga., that is 31.2 miles from downtown Atlanta and is located very near the Mall of Georgia.
Frisco, Texas, a suburban community located 30 miles outside of Dallas, did the same thing in 2004 with a new suburban stadium complex for its Double-A Roughriders.
If suburban communities in Georgia and Texas are winning and keeping teams, should not the collective Richmond region be looking for a site near Short Pump mall in Western Henrico County? That area is only 15 miles from Richmond's city center.
Though I am opposed to locating a new stadium in Short Pump, I am confident that it would succeed there with less financial risk than a project in Shockoe Bottom -- and that it would pack the stands on a regular basis.
Bryan Bostic -- one of the lead advocates for the Highwoods Properties' development plan for a Shockoe Bottom complex that includes a stadium -- is an essential part of why baseball will return to Richmond. He is an inspirational speaker for Richmond baseball and is 100 percent committed to the game. He is also interested in the potential economic benefits to the Richmond region that could go hand-in-hand with the shared successes of a large mixed-use project in which a ballpark could be a leading part.
The position of Highwoods Properties -- the company that the city has selected as lead developer for the Shockoe stadium complex and the new development at the site of The Diamond -- is that economic benefits are one of the top reasons for building Shockoe Center, the mixed use/ballpark project.
Dennis Coates, a University of Maryland-Baltimore County economics professor, however, was quoted in the Sept. 29, 2008, Atlanta Journal-Constitution regarding the Gwinnett County stadium: "The only ones who think they're going to create development and jobs aren't economists."
Local baseball fans will spend money from within their existing personal spending limitations. A visit to a restaurant in Shockoe Bottom after a game means one less visit to another restaurant in the region on another day.
Tax collections related to that visit will be redirected away from existing government revenue in order to pay for the stadium bonds managed by the proposed Richmond Sports Facilities Authority. Indirectly, the stadium in Shockoe Bottom would be at least partially government financed.
The prerequisite for any team to locate in or near Richmond is the promise of a new stadium -- be it urban or suburban. My family will attend games wherever Bryan Bostic can secure a team and build or rebuild a stadium.
From the standpoint of baseball alone, the Shockoe Bottom site is quite interesting. Why then should we consider staying at the Boulevard or relocating to any of these sites other than Shockoe Bottom? The answer is simple. It is our history. It is the nation's history.
Shockoe Bottom is the Ground Zero of Virginia's participation in the American trafficking of humans as personal property. Enshrining this history with an interpretive path, new museums, and the right physical experience for visitors could become the center of our city's national identity.
Jim Collins wrote a book based on the premise that good is the enemy of great. If we settle for good, we will miss the opportunity to be great. Why not make Shockoe Bottom the destination for experiencing our nation's history before, during, and after the Civil War?
A national slave museum located very near Lumpkin's Jail and other sites in Shockoe Bottom would add greatly to the collection of other Civil War-related draws to Richmond. Many of them could be connected using replicas of electric street cars fashioned after the nation's first trolleys -- which operated right here in Richmond.
Richmond's history is unique and abundant, but it has lacked sufficient coordination and marketing as a serious tourism destination. Unlike a ballpark drawing on local dollars, national-level tourism brings dollars to Richmond from outside the region.
There is still time to sort out the details for a history-centered plan for Shockoe Bottom that would anchor our vision for Richmond. There is little time, however, for choosing the location of a new ballpark.
The timing for a new ballpark commitment is far more critical than the location chosen. Urgent action is required to prevent losing a good opportunity to secure a baseball team. A decision needs to be made now to locate a ballpark somewhere other than Shockoe Bottom -- and to get a team.
Save Shockoe Bottom for something bigger and more unique -- something truly great.
George Nyfeler manages the Richmond office of McCrone Inc., a civil engineering firm specializing in re-development. He is a resident of the City of Richmond and is a student of urban studies and planning at VCU. He can be reached at
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I think our vision of Richmond needs to be focused in one defined area. Putting a new building here or there is not helping the overall perception of “Our City.“
I think this area should be Shockoe Bottom because it is our most historied, visible, desperate, central, etc location. We now know that it will be our transportation hub. It is already located near our high-rise business district. Nearby residential areas are already starting to remodel.
Let us keep our focus and turn Shockoe Bottom into a bustling commercial, business, museum, ballpark, trans hub, and riverfront district ALL AT ONCE! Any one of these alone is doomed…
Sorry - the previous post’s grammatical errors had not been edited out. Here is corrected section of the comment:
There are data available on the prospects for retail/entertainment development projects and for heritage tourism projects. In all likelihood, what is developed for the Boulevard and Shockoe Bottom will contain elements of both. After all, there is “heritage and history” in sports and entertainment, too. However, what Shockoe Bottom offers is a physical place that is rich and unique enough for the Black community to begin to tell its history, yes, but also for so many others to be able to tell theirs - Native Americans, Jews, later European and recent Asian and African immigrants. Shockoe Bottom offers the physical means to tell the history of trade and technology, of education and medicine, of faith and philosophy. But the stories of the past are only useful when presented in contexts that demonstrate their relevance to the present and the future. As an African American of mixed heritage, I don’t want to see just another “museum” to slavery. I want an on-the-ground experience, the place and space and information I would get from walking through the historical results of the visions and decisions of all the peoples that make us who we are as Richmonders today. Memory. Vision. Experience brings inspiration. Entertainment and tourism professionals know that. Good teachers and Ken Burns know that. Good business minds know that.
I want to thank Mr. Nyfeler for offering his perspective on the many overlapping issues that the development proposal has raised. There are data available on the prospects for retail/entertainment development projects and for heritage tourism projects. In all likelihood, what is developed for the Boulevard and Shockoe Bottom will contain elements of both. After all, there is “heritage and history” in sports and entertainment, too. However, what Shockoe Bottom offers as a physical place that is rich and unique enough for the Black community, yes, but also for so many others whose contributions to our national story. The past matters, but always because of what it means for the present and the future.
Everyone is thinking about the money, and how many people will come to a new stadium, or a relocated stadium, why not renovate the great one we have now?
I remember when i was about 6 or 7 years old i say my first Richmond Braves game, i was on my daddy’s shoulders and we were walking towards the stadium when i pointed out the huge Indian at the entrance, and i remember that statue to this day, and i remember walking through the blue iron gates, and sitting up in the 3rd row, above the dug-out. The Braves won that day.
So why dont people think about those little girls, and boys who go to their very first baseball game and then 8 years later it’s about to be torn down, and/or relocated. We’ve already lost the team, and the name Home of the Braves, why do we have to loose the stadium? Why don’t we just renovate, and create something we need, instead of crushing memories.
The trend in the real world is build in the cities. For econonmic reasons, for environmental reasons (stop the sprawl) and yes for historical reasons. Those that only promote one of these reasons, are being short sighted,and probably are harboring self interest . One need only look at DC, BALTIMORE,ATLANTA, to name a few with ball- parks downtown. Cities are far more friendly to the new green movement, than the wasteful sprawl of the last 30 years. Richmond City is centrally located in the metro area. Memphis Tn. probably offers a more comparable example to memic. Downtown Short Pump is only downtown for Henricoans,Downtown Richmond is Downtown for everybody else. Stop the Apartheid movement, build the stadium in SHOCKOE BOTTOM for all to injoy!
james - Yea, I will laugh b/c I’ve lived in Richmond long enough to know IT WILL NOT HAPPEN in any time in the next 15-20 years. Yea, Dwight Jones can WANT the light rail all he wants but in typical Richmond fashion, you won’t be able to get the metro support. The other counties don’t want to work with the city. They only look out for themselves. It would take in the neighborhood of a 750 million dollars to get this things planned out and built. Where is that money going to come from? Raising taxes? Raise toll fare? Yea right. Richmond metro residents will balk at ANYTHING that causes their taxes to go up.
ddub28… laugh all you like, but as a real estate attorney I work with the city council regularly. They’re dying for more mass transit, and specifically light rail. Dwight Jones sees it as the key to creating the regional government he wants. The city just doesn’t have the money to do it right now.
But putting a stadium in Shockoe along with entertainment geared toward the historic significance of the area will get them about as much federal money as they want. The liberals in DC will dole out any money asked for if it highlights ills of the old South.
You watch. If they build the stadium in Shockoe the city will apply for the hundreds of millions they need to fund light rail and raise taxes or create a transportation tax to help match the federal dollars. They’ll draw up three lines—one to Short Pump. one to Watkins Centre and one to Mechanicsville. Mark my words—it’ll happen.
I’m not 100% sure if a new ballpark in Shockoe Bottom is the best idea.
But I am sure nothing else of substance seems to be interested in Shockoe Bottom.
I am also sure that the only entertainment/restaurant that seemed to crop up around the Boulevard site since the mid 60s was a Bill’s BBQ. Still using a notepad to take orders the last time I stopped by.
Shockoe Bottom is the most visible site we have in Richmond with thousands of out of towners passing N/S on 95 everyday. But none stopping.
To those who insist that the city will not be on the hook financially, the only thing clear about that right now is that it’s not clear. It’s certainly not as clear cut as the developers would like us to believe.
If Highwoods is completely redeveloping the Boulevard site, why is it such a bad idea to put a ballpark there along with other stuff? I don’t understand why that idea is totally off the table for them.
Where in Short Pump would you all like to build a stadium? In case you hadn’t noticed, there isn’t exactly a boatload of land sitting around waiting for a stadium to be built on it. And if you think developing downtown is expensive, try buying enough land in Short Pump to put a stadium. I don’t think so.
Finally…traffic in Short Pump is already HORRENDOUS. If you think a downtown stadium would make traffic bad there, what do you think it would do in Short Pump, make it better?
There is already a major bus transit center planned at the Main Street Station downtown. That area is going to become a transportation hub for the region, so it makes sense to have the stadium there.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement