Utilities: Smart Billing

» 2 Comments | Post a Comment

A little more than a year ago, the Wilder administration and the City Council backed off a proposed stormwater fee to underwrite infrastructure projects, many of which the council killed off for financial reasons. This year the council decided it could put matters off no longer, and adopted a budget that included a stormwater fee.

City residents have received brochures. In a few weeks, they'll receive the bills, which typically will run in the neigbhorhood of $50 for the year. Businesses will have to shell out, too.

Although we're not in the habit of cheering taxes and fees, this one makes sense. The fee is based on the amount of impervious surface per property, and the money collected will go to the upkeep of stormwater drop inlets, ditches, catch basins, and so on. That marks an improvement over the practice of paying for these projects out of the general fund, under which the amount paid bore no relation to the amount of runoff from a property.

Like other localities, Richmond is under mandate to improve its stormwater system. The changes will help improve the health of the Chesapeake and forestall federal intervention in that regard. As the system matures, we'd like to see it incorporate incentives for owners who adopt measures -- rain barrels, rain gardens, grassy swales, and so forth -- that reduce runoff in environmentally friendly ways. Rewarding residents and businesses for taking such steps would make a smart system even smarter.

Advertisement

 
View More: stormwater utility,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by charley on July 09, 2009 at 1:43 pm

This city mandate has been put off time & time again back to Jamison’s admin. I have tried to find the last city annexation of chesterfield county records but to no avail. I stand to be corrected but if memory serves me right the city promised to have storm water system in place for the annexed area as part of the deal. Your archives could be better searched by you for a summary of what the city promised. The gratests need for storm water mgt. is in the annexed area.
Thanks,
Charley

Flag Comment Posted by oatka on July 06, 2009 at 10:53 am

This is nothing but a tax on rain.

Alice in Wonderland rationale: “The fee is based on the amount of impervious surface per property, and the money collected will go to the upkeep of stormwater drop inlets, ditches, catch basins, and so on.“

Haven’y we been paying taxes for years for that upkeep? Seems like Virginia’s municipal governments are out to relinquish every possible civic responsibility they have in order to finance their jobs, and to then assess “user fees” for tasks that should have been paid from the general fund in the first place.

I can’t wait to see what excuse they use to tax air and sunshine, with a surcharge for clouds.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement