Apparition

» 1 Comment | Post a Comment

For many years conservatives dismissed Sen. Arlen Specter as a "rino" -- a Republican in name only. This week the Pennsylvanian dropped the R.

Specter's crossing of the aisle moves Democrats closer to a filibuster-proof majority. Although the senator says he will continue to go his own way, his defection will complicate efforts to thwart the Obama administration's statist agenda. Do not be surprised if partisan inertia brought out the worst.

Certain Republicans reacted to the news with the whiny belligerence that has typified the party's persona recently. Rush Limbaugh bellowed that John McCain ought to follow Specter out of the party. Even the base should find such bluster offensive.

Calculation explains Specter's switch (he was destined to lose next year's GOP primary); the move had little to do with principle. Yet the event grabs the GOP by the lapels and gives it a thorough shaking. There are reasons Republicans are collapsing in suburbs not only in Northern Virginia but in Philadelphia, St. Louis, Denver, and just about everywhere. As one strategist advises, Republicans need to put down books by Ann Coulter.

. . .

Speaking of Pennsylvania: Several decades ago the state's Richard Schweiker contended for the title of most liberal GOP senator. During his 1976 bid for the Republican presidential nomination, Ronald Reagan said Schweiker would be his runningmate. The move resembled a Hail Mary pass. It also reminds factionalists that Reagan was more interested in discovering who is a Republican than in deciding who isn't.

Advertisement

 
View More: rush limbaugh,republicans,arlen specter,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by CMcK on April 30, 2009 at 1:05 pm

I take issue with some of the key notes in this editorial.  First of all, Rush Limbaugh is not a Republican, nor is he a spokesperson for the party.  He is a conservative.  He has made this clear, time and time again.  Perhaps, you not have heard that.  Secondly, his comment was that he was told by a number of Republicans that John McCain should follow Specter out.  Rush agrees with that, but your portrayal leaves the reader with some notion that Rush is a “thought leader” for the Republican Party.  Again, he is not.  Thirdly, the idea that Republicans should put down books by Ann Coulter, as attributed to “one strategist” is precisely the opposite of what should be done to help the party.  The party unity is based in the division between the “Republican Left” and Conservativism”.  Weeding out the “rinos”, such as Specter, is clearly a good thing.  Weeding out more, including McCain, would be an even better thing.  There is clearly a movement afoot, as evidenced by the recent tea parties, to embrace a more conservative philosophy in America.  Most people are fed up with Obama’s “road to socialism” and his lack of support to uphold the US Constitution.  All persons are created equal, and they remain equal in terms of being a “human life”.  Beyond that, all Americans have an opportunity to better themselves economically, as mandated by current law, and therein lies the difference.  Not all Americans are willing to work as hard or sacrifice as much to attain “economic wealth”.  Many choose “family health” as their priority, and will not trade it for material goods.  To each their own, and to each, they must lie in the bed they make, whether under a custom down comforter from Neiman Marcus or a family heirloom quilt.  We’re Americans, and we have a choice.  A strong two-party system is the best one for our country, and with the departure of Specter, we’re on that road.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement