LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

» 2 Comments | Post a Comment

Israel's Treatment Of Gaza Is Brutal

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

A. Barton Hinkle's recent Op/Ed column, "For Israel's Detractors, It's No Fair Fighting Back," defending Israel's brutalization of the Gaza refugee population is a case study in rhetorical duplicity. Hinkle exhausts the standard litany of canards propagated by armies that crush the helpless and dispossessed: They forced us to kill civilians, and we have no choice because they hate us for who we are, not what we do. And finally, he deploys the trump card of changing the subject: If you really thought there was a moral issue here you would look elsewhere.

Hinkle substitutes inflammatory rhetoric for facts and reporting. The dead and mangled people of Gaza were forced to be shields, he claims. The primitive rockets coming out of Gaza are part of an existential threat to Israel and have nothing to do with the 1.5 million people pushed into what can best be described as a concentration camp. Criticism of Israel's violation of international law is part of a "wave of anti-Semitism worldwide." Why talk about the facts when one can wave the bloody shirt?

Usually Hinkle is opposed to defining deviancy down, but not here. The fact that Israel claims the rights reserved for democratic states that adhere to Western standards of liberty is suddenly irrelevant and the billions in aid from the U.S. every year is inconsequential. Does Hinkle believe the U.S. is funding the repression in other countries? We have seen these rhetorical techniques before -- they are common to totalitarian states. Hinkle should set a higher standard.

Frank Allen. Richmond.

Arab States Use Palestinians as Pawns

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

Vince Newton's response to A. Barton Hinkle's column on Gaza and Israel calls for clarity. It is Newton's view of the history of this region that transcends reality.

The re-creation of the state of Israel by the U.N., not the West, was done with major support from Soviet Russia and the U.S. Israel is a secular, democratic state founded by secular Jews . The religious elements within Israel were and are in a minority -- and indeed, certain of them are anti-Israel because of the country's secular character.

Turkey is another democratic, secular country in the region that clearly bridges the gap between the West and the East. It is a creation of the breakup of the Ottoman Empire after WWI. It also continues to be involved with battling forces (Kurd) that look to undermine and destroy its integrity.

Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Pakistan, and Iran also are examples of countries whose existence and/or borders are rather recent, and one could say the result of Western influences. The situation in Israel, with Hamas and Hezbollah on its borders, is one of ideological extremism on the part of the latter two terrorist organizations. These organizations are surrogates for others (e.g., Iran) attempting to gain hegemony in the area.

The issue is not the interests of Palestinians. Jordan threw the Palestinians out. Egypt limits Palestinian access across their shared border. As horrible as the situation is with respect to Israel and the Palestinians, no state can abide a neighbor whose stated objective is its extinction.

Richard Carchman. Columbia.

We All Should Wish New President Well

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

I voted for John McCain.

The older I get the more conservative I become.

However, I looked at Jan. 20 as a day of hope.

Our president, Barack Obama, enters office in a difficult and trying time, and I wish him only the best. However, there are people who wish him ill.

How can you call yourself an American if you want our president to fail? If he falters, then we as a country falter. This is not about a difference of opinion. This is about putting aside our differences to make things better. And right now, America needs a lot of better.

Obama is an inspiration to billions around the world. He represents the American dream. We should be proud of what he represents, even if we are not in unison with all of his policies. And we should let history judge Obama after his term ends, not before.

I wish Obama and the United States of America the best, and I hope eight years from now I can say, he was a great president.

I hope.

L. Bert Stanley III. Goochland.

Let's Hope for Change For All of America

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

My hope for America is peace and tranquility for all people and all races. My hope for America is that people will stop the malicious violence against one another. I believe every man, woman, and child should not lack anything.

The government is taking everyone's money and not helping the homeless. I want the people in authority to be fair. My hope is for the people to stand up against all evil and tyranny. As Americans, we should support one another and lift one another up when one is down. God created all people, so we should not discriminate against anyone. This is my hope for America.

Israel Allen, Armstrong High School.

Richmond.

Advertisement

 
View More: israel,gaza,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by greta on January 24, 2009 at 7:00 pm

For once the mass media reported the truth about the war in Gaza. From Hamas breaking International Law and shelling Israel and starting the miserable process for God knows how many times. Using terms like “inflammatory rhetoric” implies that what Mr. Hinkle wrote was not true. One needs only to read the accounts in Al Jazeera and other Arab media outlets to ascertain that it was all indeed true and a great deal worse than what was reported in the Western press.
The members of Hamas bragged to the media how clever they were to have used the civilian population to their advantage. How co-operative the citizens were in order to defeat the “Jewish dogs and pigs.“
It seems that no matter how loudly they proclaim their goals the world at large refuses to listen.
Perhaps it is ther superb rhetorical techniques?
The US by the way sends as many billions in aid to Egypt as it does to Israel!
The rules of war and the Geneva Convention were drawn up without the knowledge of the kind of war that was waged in Vietnam and is being waged now in Iraq and Afghanistan and Gaza.
Hamas targets Israeli civilians and makes no provision to protect their own population.
Disproportinate response is a very good example of biased rhetoric.
Under international Law if an enemy shoots at you with a machine gun you are entitled to reply with a tank.
Classic laws of war permit total embargos.
Not to waver too far from the point of the commentary. What Mr. Hinkle wrote was the truth. The truth does not reach the level of “standard litany” because it is oft repeated. In this instance it had a chance to be read by a much larger audience who saw it not as “litany” but as revelation.

Flag Comment Posted by richard on January 24, 2009 at 10:16 am

Mr B Hinkle’s comments on Gaza also beg for a political solution in the region. Such a solution can only be arrived at when radical ideologues on all sides recognize that the future , if there is one, for the region requires an acceptance of the State of Israel and a rejection apocalyptic rhetoric.The failure to achieve peace in every way is a lack of seeing the future outside of the lens from the 8th century. Modernity can be achieved without destroying the rich historical traditions of the past.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
Times-Dispatch Shop
 

Advertisement