Letters To The Editor: Wise County Plant Isn’t Necessary
Wise County Plant Isn't Necessary
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Although the news article, "New Permit for Coal-Fired Power Plant Pleases Both Sides," quotes Dominion Virginia Power as claiming that the Wise County coal plant is vital to meeting Virginia's future energy needs, the opposite is true.
An independent study found that Virginia can meet all of its expected energy demand for the next 15 years simply by investing in cost-effective and existing energy-efficiency technologies. We can avoid constructing any new generation facilities just by weatherizing homes, upgrading heating and cooling systems in office buildings, and updating lighting in factories. These same technologies would bring 10,000 new jobs to the commonwealth, while the costs associated with the coal plant would actually force the Virginia economy to contract by move than 1,400 jobs (a conservative estimate given pending climate legislation).
Dominion's claim that its coal plant will help the economic wellbeing of Southwest Virginia also misses the mark. Our reliance on coal allows for the devastating practice of mountaintop removal coal mining, which is ravaging Southwest Virginia. Tops are ripped off mountains, streams are blocked by waste, and then the coal is transported out of the community, suffocating people with the toxic dust that blows off coal trucks.
The alternatives to coal are real. The new energy future broke ground in Virginia last month when construction began on our very first wind farm in Highland County. This project makes Virginia a leader in the region and marks the beginning of a bright future for the commonwealth. Virginia has incredible renewable energy potential -- our offshore wind potential is the highest in the South. When coupled with efficiency improvements, it is clear that coal plants could be a thing of the past. Lauren Glickman, Virginia Campaign Coordinator, Chesapeake Climate Action Network.
Richmond.
President's Speech Was Only to Inspire Students
Editor, Times-Dispatch:
Educational leaders and school boards in the counties of Chesterfield, Hanover, and Powhatan, and the cities of Colonial Heights and Petersburg, must feel like a bunch of lunkheads and jerks. If not, they ought to, for caving in to a small minority of parents and preventing their students from watching the original broadcast of President Barack Obama's address -- thus depriving them of an encouraging, inspirational, and thought-provoking speech. Far from brainwashing America's youth, the address was a bedrock of wisdom and goodwill.
When President John F. Kennedy gave his Inaugural Address in 1961, my family was living in Verona, Italy, where my father was stationed. The American school for dependents we all attended televised the event (a day later), and it still echoes in my consciousness and inspires me to do better every day.
That was simply the essence of Obama's speech. Such a shame that some school-age kids today were not given the privilege and likewise advantage of the same courtesy.
Robert Schultz.
Richmond.
Home Health Care Is Not a Funding Source
Editor, Times-Dispatch:
As the debate about health care reform rages on, one thing is certain: Certified home health agencies are being unfairly targeted as a source of funding for the proposed health reform plan. The fact that the proposed government plan will cut 18 percent of the current Medicare payments for home health care in the next three years is disturbing enough. The Center for Medicare Services (CMS) has already required home health agencies to fund the cost of additional third-party contractors to survey satisfaction or face a penalty of 2 percent of an agency's earned payment.
This satisfaction survey requirement is in addition to all the certifications agencies must have through the state and Medicare. It applies even to those agencies that have gone above and beyond Medicare's requirements to achieve membership in stringent organizations such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and Community Health and Program Services, which require rigorous steps, as well as money, to give them the elevated status that is revered by the medical community. Apparently this isn't enough for CMS.
In addition to the audit costs and employee time, CMS has embarked on a crusade to collect money from past payments from Medicare to home health agencies. This will cost home health agencies approximately $40,000 per year, and countless hours of employee time just for medical information gathering. These past payment reviews are called RAC (Recovery Audit Contractor) audits and are yet another obstacle to focusing on the primary concern of a home health agency -- the patient.
It is estimated that in one year 41 percent of Richmond-area home health agencies will have a negative profit margin, and by the end of 2011 that number will increase to 63 percent if they must endure these costs. The number of agencies for Virginians to choose from will be drastically reduced. These hurdles are not only obstacles to running a private business, they are another example of the bureaucracy that plagues our health care system. They threaten the very organizations (home health agencies) that offer a solution to skyrocketing costs of lengthy hospital stays, allowing patients to stay in their own homes. Ed Kassab, CEO, At Home Care. Richmond.
Reader Reactions
The Nature Conservancy has published a paper titled-
“Energy Sprawl or Energy Effeciency:
Policy inpacts on Natural Habitat for the United States of America.“
Nuclear energy is the best land intensive it requires only one (I) square mile to produce one million megawatt-hours per year, enough electricity for about 90,000 homes.
Biofuels-ethanol and biodiesel-require up to five hundred (500) square miles to produce the same amouny.
Coal-requires four (4) square miles.
Solar Thermal-takes six (6).
Natural Gas-takes eight (8)
Petroleum-takes eighteen (18)
Wind Farms-takes over thirty (30)
It would require 300 miles of wind turbines on mountaintops from Chattanooga Tenn. to Bristol Va. to produce just i/4th of the energy that can come from 1 reactor on 1 square mile.
Right on, Dave!! Sir, this is another example of “follow the money” in order to find the truth.
Could it be that Ms. Glickman’s ‘opinion’ on this issue be somewhat influenced by the organization from which she receives compensation or to which she belongs? I would say that it is a safe bet.
Regarding wind power and solar power, that is all fine and dandy - and it is obviously something that could be PART OF an energy policy for the future. However, until we can make the wind blow all the time or the sun shine at full capacity every day, there are vast reserves of oil, natural gas and coal underneath our land and our offshore territorial waters.
I find it funny how many claim to hate our dependence upon “foreign oil” (actually a fungible commodity), while doing everything possible to prevent harvesting and refining our own plentiful domestic reserves. Me thinks there is a bigger agenda behind their illogical sentiments.
Anyway, if you can find a way to make my diesel-powered truck able to pull a 53-foot trailer with a giant solar panel or windmill atop the roof, I will put more faith in such “alternative” fuels.
~ So sayeth The Dutchman ~
“When all is said and done, a heck of a lot more is said than done.“
Anybody who actually believes that the reagan or the Bush I or the Obama speeches to the school children was not for cynical, political purposes is a lunkhead.
The original complaints about the speech which did not start in Virginia were to the “menu of classroom activities” which took the cynicism to a whole new level.
Virginia was in good company with schools in Minnesota and Wisconsin and Illinois.
The schools in New York and Los Angeles were spared the decision because they did not open until Thursday.
I found that the local school districts official statements all followed the practical theme of not disrupting teachers plans for the first day of school.
Margaret Meara, Superintendent of schools in Powhatan said that they opeted not to participate in the watching of the speech and the “suggested’ before and after activities “primarily because activities were already planned for the first day of school. This is not an indication of any disrespect for the president. We received extremely short notice of the planned speech.“
That was echoed by Chesterfield whose statement reads in part “Though Chesterfield County Public Schools embraces the president’s message on challenging students and is grateful for the support he has extended in the form of stimulus funding for public education, we do not wish to intefere with our staff’s ability to repeat past opening-day successes.“
The concern seems to have been for the teachers and the students.
But the menu of classroom activities is what engendered the uproar at the beginning.
Unfortunately many citizens who jumped to label the protests anti-Obama partianship were either actually ignorant of or willfully ignored the
existence of the menu altogether.
But to repeat, anyone who believes that the event was not politically motivated must also believe that David Axelrod has two eyebrows.
Ms. Glickman, what are your sources for your assertions? You’re all for ‘offshore wind potential’. Well, how about ‘offshore oil potential’? I would like to see the logic behind the creation of ‘10,000’ new jobs from ‘new technologlies’ while creating a new coal plant would cut jobs by 1,400. What kinds of jobs will windmills create that are different from those created by coal-fired plants? Wouldn’t more energy from ANY source in that part of the state help to ameliorate the deplorable employment conditions out there? Why do you write off only the options you disapprove of when all options would be helpful? Oh, you’re the ‘campaign coordinator for the Climate Action Network’. You couldn’t possibly be biased in favor of an increasingly discredited global warming ‘crisis’. By the way, who pays your salary and funds your ‘network’?
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement