Letters To The editor

» 2 Comments | Post a Comment



There Are Simple Ways To Fix Health Care
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Suppose one could buy auto insurance after a collision. Who would buy auto insurance prior to an accident? Suppose one could buy health insurance after getting sick. Who would buy health insurance when they were well? The answer to both questions is the same: nobody with a working brain. If we force health insurers to cover people with pre-existing conditions, that is, those who want to buy insurance after they're sick, who will pick up the tab? It will be the people who are still insured prior to getting sick. What will happen to the insurance costs of those people who are picking up the tab for those gaming the system? Insurance costs will grow exponentially. Everyone will wait until they really need it to buy insurance, and the pre-existing condition insurance Ponzi scheme will come to an end.

Poor people have Medicaid, CHIP, free health clinics, and access to emergency-room care at hospitals. They are not impacted that much by pre-existing conditions affecting their health care options. Some middle-income families are impacted by pre-existing condition insurance problems, either by choosing not to purchase health insurance, or because the head of the family lost his or her job. A better solution is for the government to provide supplemental coverage of COBRA insurance until the unemployed person finds a new job with health coverage. If this person is dealing with a pre-existing condition, then the government should continue to supplement the purchase of COBRA insurance so this family can remain with the original health insurer. The cost of this pre-existing health insurance option could be funded by payroll taxes as part of the disability insurance program. The payroll tax would be very modest, as all employed persons would contribute and benefit. We don't need to overhaul our entire health care system to deal with this problem.

Richard Jarvis.
Richmond.



People Do Change -- I'm Voting Republican
Editor, Times-Dispatch: A politically driven focus on a 20-year-old master's thesis in the gubernatorial campaign has shown that people can change their minds over time. This is true in my case: For the first time in 20 years of voting for Virginia governors, I plan to vote for a Republican -- Bob McDonnell.

Creigh Deeds' vacuous political campaign of insults and negative attacks has given me a glimpse of a man I do not want as governor. Unlike Deeds, McDonnell can relate to the issues that women really care about: family, finances, and faith.

As a wife and mother, I put family first. McDonnell realizes that the right choice can be amazing -- as my own family shows. We adopted one of our daughters -- a sweet, beautiful girl who was placed for adoption by a brave young birthmother. Our baby son, who has brought so much joy to my family, has Down syndrome, a condition that sadly leads many to choose abortion. All of our children have blessed us beyond measure.

McDonnell realizes the importance of instruction in the role of education and support for teachers. As a former high school teacher, I have firsthand knowledge of the impact that a well-educated teacher can provide a classroom. But, despite my years of experience and multiple degrees, the current teacher pay scale would make it incredibly difficult for me were I the sole provider for my family. McDonnell and Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling have proposed pay raises and an infusion of instructional capital for Virginia school systems.

Finally, I am grateful to support a person of strong faith. McDonnell writes and acts on his beliefs, while also respecting the beliefs of those around him.

So what would a smart woman choose? I've made my choice.

Gwen Smith.
Mechanicsville.



Extreme Christians Pushed Him Away
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Dr. Patrick Reardon is right when he asserts in his letter, "Many Women Want to Stay at Home," that I believe Bob McDonnell is a Christian extremist. The only view McDonnell has backed away from is keeping women in the home; and I suspect that living with three of them has shown him just how independent they can be. As I wrote in my earlier letter, "Propagating Morality Is Not a Public Need," extremists have had little incentive to change their spots over the past 30 years. It is extremely hard to believe that all of a sudden McDonnell has become a moderate.

I was raised a Christian. However, I have been pushed further and further away as Christians reverted to the hatred and intolerance from the Old Testament instead of the love and tolerance preached by their own Savior. The only people Jesus was intolerant of were the ones who behaved like today's Christians. The only time He became violently angry was toward the moneychangers and their greed. I suspect He would feel the same about anyone spouting hatred in His name, and building political empires with overflowing coffers.

I respect human life as much as anyone, and I don't advocate abortion as a preferred method of birth control; but I also remember the news stories of young girls found dead in a hotel room or dumpster after having a back-alley abortion. The laws were changed to protect these women's right to life. I will always put the rights of the living over the rights of a handful of cells. No woman should be forced to undergo months of misery and untold changes to her body just to satisfy somebody else's sense of morality.

D. Scott McRae.
Henrico.

Advertisement

 
View More: letters to the editor,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Ken on October 06, 2009 at 9:10 pm

It always fascinates me, when the pro-choicers reference the “back-alley abortions.“  Their “logic” appears to be, that abortions are going to happen anyway, so why not make them safer?

People are always going to speed, to let’s legalize it, giving out free lessons on how to drive more safely at higher speeds.  People are going to smoke, so let’s make filtered cigarretes more accessible to them.

Isn’t that the same logic?

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on October 05, 2009 at 7:14 am

McRae: Ah, that ol’ ‘tolerance’ thing. Can’t get around that word when it comes to Jesus, can we? Well, it is not used once in the New Testament - either by Him or anyone else. I’m glad to know you have unilaterally chosen to judge your fellow believers. That says more about you than it does them. We all would do well to read His own words in Matthew. We all would do well to stop putting words in His mouth and search deep within ourselves for their meaning rather than jumping to the conclusion that He justifies what we would prefer to believe. Statistics and experiential evidence shout out the fearful toll being taken on society by ‘tolerance’. Sometimes we ‘can’t have it all’. We have to fulfill the role God put us here to fill. We need to stop trying to make Him agree with us and seek reconciliation with HIS will.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
Times-Dispatch Shop
 

Advertisement