Letters to the editor
A Round of Applause For New Ha'Penny Stage
Editor, Times-Dispatch:
What a pleasant surprise to see the new Ha'Penny Stage in Byrd Park. We went to an afternoon performance celebrating Chinese culture, which was superb. The new stage is higher so one can see better and the backdrop is high enough that performers can stage themselves without being seen. Simple concepts, but they add tremendously to the audience's enjoyment.
What really impressed us, however, was moving the stage out of direct sun. No more sitting in the broiling sun and shading one's eyes to see the performance. Finally someone thought to relocate the stage slightly and now performers and audience alike have shade. Even more surprising was provision of chairs for the audience. This was an unusually large crowd with many older-than-usual patrons and the Dogwood Dell staff made a good call in providing chairs. I hope they continue to do so when the audience warrants it.
I also hope that these Chinese performers come back next year, perhaps even to the main stage at Dogwood Dell. They certainly are Dell-worthy. From the aerial antics of the martial artists to the charming dances of little girls in red overalls, it was a delightful and inspiring performance and a great kickoff for the improved venue.
I am glad that in this day of reduced budgets and service cut-backs, the city recognizes the importance of the Festival of Arts and continues not only to support it, but to offer improvements. Thanks Richmond Parks and Recreation, and keep up the good work.
Elaine Lidholm.
Richmond.
Quality Health Care Belongs to All Americans
Editor, Times-Dispatch: In his letter, "Can The Government Beat This Health Care?" L.E. Nugent says he is perfectly satisfied with his health insurance. Millions of Americans, including myself, are lucky to have quality health insurance they (or their employers) can afford. However, the big picture is a different story and the health reforms being debated in Congress have become a necessity.
Over the past eight years, health care costs have skyrocketed, with premiums for employer-based family coverage rising more than five times faster than average U.S. earnings. Pre-existing condition restrictions, caps on coverage, and higher deductibles and co-pays have put a significant strain on family budgets. In 2008, over 13 million Americans with insurance spent over 25 percent of their family income on health care costs. More than one-half of all personal bankruptcy cases are due, at least in part, to illnesses and medical costs.
People without access to employer-based coverage have to shop in the individual health insurance market. These expensive policies have even more limits and higher out-of-pocket costs. Many applicants cannot obtain a policy at any price, just because they have been sick in the past.
Forty-six million Americans, including 9 million children, are living without health care coverage. Every year, especially during this recession, more hard-working families join the ranks of the uninsured. Over the past 15 years, the percentage of uninsured workers in Virginia has gone up nearly 16 percent.
This is why a solid majority of Americans supports health reform. The proposals in Congress will allow Nugent to keep his private insurance while they help all Americans get quality, affordable insurance. Everyone will be a part of the system, and no one will have to fear that one accident or illness will leave them unable to care for themselves or their families.
Jill Hanken.
Richmond.
McAuliffe Invigorated Virginia Politics
Editor, Times-Dispatch: So, he parachuted in carrying his carpetbag? Who cares? He was one heckuva candidate. Whatever happened to Terry McAuliffe?
The carpetbagger tag seemed a favorite. The parachuting-in line was another. Connections to Bill Clinton came to be spoken of as a disease. Yet McAuliffe didn't have to spend what has to be millions of his own money on his campaign. He didn't have to decide that just maybe he had something to offer his home state of the past 20 years.
But he did all of that and much, much more.
Whoever heard of a candidate having a business plan of six chapters (123 pages) of detailed, specific, and knowledgeable proposals for education, transportation, economic security, energy, and job creation? Plus, there was a chapter on the question that so many people asked: How was he going to pay for all the promises? Chapter 6 told how.
His plan is full of viable, creative ideas about where the jobs could come from. The problem? No one I've met had read the business plan.
The incredible endorsement of The Washington Post touted Creigh Deeds as the "Transportation Governor" but his Web site didn't mention transportation and Brian Moran's mention was tepid. McAuliffe had a 26-page plan of up-to-date information even down to proposals for the Obama transportation stimulus money.
He sees things differently because he hasn't been involved in state government. He is mystified by what he sees as Virginia's failure to be innovative, to be the most attractive state for new businesses and industries. He urged Virginia to match and exceed incentives that are working for other states.
Part of the charm of Sen. Mark Warner is his sense of humor. McAuliffe seemed to be from that mold. He remained good-humored while Moran became angry and attacked him -- from the February Jefferson-Jackson Democratic Dinner on regularly for four months. Typically, the concession video of McAuliffe was upbeat. He said he wouldn't give anything for the experience of running, that he'd had a great time.
And you know what? I'll bet he did. Nancy St.Clair Finch. Richmond.
Chesterfield Supervisors Ask Necessary Questions
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Hooray for the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors' questioning of the Chesterfield School Board. It is clear the School Board does not like the questions. It has been a long time coming that someone is actually asking how our tax dollars are spent.
In the past, the School Board had one way of balancing a budget and that was to find a new program or project to spend any surplus. Many school systems are required to maintain a certain surplus in order to handle years like this one. Even the state has a rainy-day fund. Why not one for the Chesterfield school system?
Marleen Durfee is my representative on the Board of Supervisors and I commend her for the pointed questions she is asking and pressing for redistricting to solve the overcrowding rather than an automatic assumption by the School Board that capital improvement dollars is the answer.
Robert Derrick.
Midlothian.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
To: Virginia Gentleman. Indeed, I am very familiar with incentives offered by Virginia for business and industry and so is Terry McAuliffe. I have written about incentives in an article for the source you suggested, Virginia Business magazine. In fact, I did so when Va. offered only industrial training. We have come a long way. Sometimes, as you probably know, states offer too much, more than they can realize in return. However,incentives were a very small example of McAuliffe’s plan to bring business and industry to Va. And, perhaps, that wasn’t the best example.Strong academic and corporate links, simplifying regulatory requirements (long a complaint about Virginia), speeding the permitting process and strengthening access to capital for existing and start-up businesses were just a few of his many ideas in Chapter Two of his Business Plan, “Encouraging Businesses to Start, Relocate and Expand in Virginia.“ There have been many improvements in the years I’ve been observing but as long as we have the high unemployment that we have, especially in Southside Virginia, there is still much to be done. And that is what Terry McAuliffe was saying.
Trust the private health insurers? More, please?
We have a chance for “more, please” via support of the “Health Americans Act”, sponsored by D-Wyden and R-Bennett. Would cover 99% of Americans (via private for-profit-only insurers only) with health care coverage similar to Congress’, and…save us $1.48 Trillion $‘s over 10 yrs!
All that “more” and at less cost than a non-profit insurance option. Sounds great. Who put the stats together? The Lewin Group, an “independent” consulting firm, owned by Ingenix, subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group. Was it UnitedHealth who paid a CEO $1.1 billion, paid a $50 million settlement in NY State for cheating customers? Ingenix? Was it their EDI dept that had the “glitch” that afforded 2/3’s of our insurers to cheat us of billions?
If you trusted the mgt of WorldCom, Enron, Countrywide Financial, others exposed, surely you will trust UnitedHealth, Cigna, Aetna, BCBS, the whole pirate crew?
Hopefully, we will act now based on true reality of financial ruin to plague our children, rather than do nothing and let ruin sweep over them and theirs, all due to our fear generated by the financial machine of greed; fear of what might come, as though we be cowards told, “Yes, the disease is bad and growing worse, but, it could be even more so. You are still alive today. Why be worry of tomorrow? Just trust us. After all, we be same private for-profit-only health insurers that forced consumers (you) to pay billions of dollars in medical bills that the we insurers should have paid, according to a report released Jun 25, 2009 by the staff of the Senate Commerce Committee.”
Mean ole Senate Commerce Committee. They just don’t understand why insurers denied billions of dollars in medical claims. Was not fault of UnitedHealth, Cigna, Aetna, and others within the crew. It was a computer glitch.
At a committee hearing June 25, three health care specialists testified that insurers go to great lengths to avoid responsibility for sick people, use deliberately incomprehensible documents to mislead consumers about their benefits, and sell “junk” policies that fail to cover needed care. Rockefeller said he was exploring “why consumers get such a raw deal from their insurance companies.“
The star witness at the hearing was a former public relations executive for major health insurers whose testimony boiled down to this: Don’t trust the insurers.
The industry and its backers are using fear tactics, as they did in 1994, to tar a transparent and accountable—publicly accountable—health care option,“ said Wendell Potter, who until early last year was Vice President for Corporate Communications at the big insurer CIGNA.
Potter said he worries “that the industry’s charm offensive, which is the most visible part of duplicitous and well-financed PR and lobbying campaigns, may well shape reform in a way that benefits Wall Street far more than average Americans.” Insurers make paperwork confusing because “they realize that people will just simply give up and not pursue it” if they think they have been shortchanged, Potter said.
So, just trust um? That does seem bit foolish, now doesn’t it?
Hopefully, we will take responsibility NOW to drive down health care costs by approving a non-profit competitive insurance option that is not applicable to illegals from any country, just as today’s. We will act now to formulate this new freedom of choice and break the stranglehold of for-profit-only insurers and others with their lobbyists, along with their bureaucratic red tape machine of denying coverage, denying full freedom of choice of physicians, their procedures, their prescribed medications. Hopefully, we will take action to put freedom of choice and affordable coverage in the hands of all American children, not just those who can afford it.
Sorry it is - current skyrocketing costs, limited availability and choice of for-profit-only corporate administered health care is wrong on so many levels, it is not funny. It is too shameful a disease to pass to our children.
Hopefully, our children will decide to drive down costs by not extending health care benefits to half of Mexico, hopefully they’ll drive down costs by cutting down the bureaucracy, hopefully, they’ll drive down costs by instituting tort reform.
Wait until the malpractice lawsuits start pouring in on the federal government associated with medical mistakes that happened as a result of government health care - you think this is going to cost just 1.6 trillion? After the lawsuits, the cost will dwarf 1.6 trillion.
Sorry - government administered health care is wrong on so many levels, it isn’t funny.
Peter R. Orszag, Director, Congressional Budget Office in his Jan 31, 2008 Report to the Committee on the Budget United States Senate: “In 1965 America’s health care cost was 5% of GDP, per Congressional Budget Office (cbo.gov). Took 33 yrs to grow to 13.6% in 1998; then, 17% in 2008. Tracking to hit 18% this year 2009; 25% in 2025; 28% in 2030, 34% in 2040. CBO projects premiums to rise 83% in 8 yrs from 2008 level to 2016, resulting in at least half of all Americans will be forced to spend 45% of their incomes on health insurance.” (Perhaps you’ll be lucky and won’t be in 50% group of Americans who will be spending 45% of their incomes on health insurance. But later your kids?)
“Studebaker - So, if, say, Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin share a Peace Prize, that’s O.K. just as long as Stalin doesn’t win it individually. Yeah, I see your line of thinking.” Posted by ( Randy )
Randy, you post is no reply to any “line of thinking” I expressed. You do not—cannot or will not, perhaps—perceive, much less understand my point of view.
I made the point that: “The prize was not awarded for who or what these men were; it was given for a particular thing they did in spite of who or what they were. Do you understand?”
You have not replied to my point. Instead you respond to Politically Correct constructs of your own resentment—Gore, Stalin, Carter, Arafat…moochers, freeloaders—as if you desire that I join your attack on them.
Greta:‘We must remember the old admonition “there are lies, damn lies and statistics.“’
I’m at a disadvantage here because I am no whiz at math. The only thing I remember about my high school statistics is that I renamed the subject “sadistics.” But that was decades ago. While statistics are not lies, they can be damn good tools in the hands of “damn liars.” Polling data and such should be regarded with a critical eye—but not rejected out of hand.
“This subject is exceedingly complex and there is no one solution, despite some of the adamant statements made here.”
YES! But somehow or another each of us must do the best we can; and regard one another with respect. This is more than just “our country” & “our future.” I believe, even with our dwindling freedom here in American, we can pull together and make a better future worldwide. The crucial factor is going to be the common quality of character of American people. It is our responsibility in the end.
Here’s the statistic I want to see once and for all.HOW YOU GONNA PAY FOR IT.And where will the sudden influx of ‘newly’ insured go for services without rationing and/or restricting services.
Has anyone seen the latest report from the CBO that came out last Thursday nite? I won’t waste my keystrokes.Google it,old man.
If everyone were to suudenly agree that goverment run healthcare is the way to go , it still has to be financed and THAT is my major concern.Its a simple question that any genius should be able to answer.(Hint:it starts with a T)
I think its funny that someone who expects others to pay the freight for him would call those others lazy.Or for someone who wants to bellyup to the public trough to call someone else a sponge.
Greta believe it or not I think we’re having a little good natured fun.Some can take it some can only dish it out.
In the end I think we all learn except those who think they already know it all.
Per Statistics Canada, Canada‘s National Statistical Agency, 80% of Canadians are satisfied with their access to their health care system of. (re: http://www.statcan.gc.ca).
Per NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 76% of Americans said it was either “extremely” or “quite” important to “give people a choice of both a public plan administered by the federal government and a private plan for their health insurance.“ (thus, 76% of Americans are not satisfied)
Any who are against improving our system want to provide stats, similar to UCLA’s May report of one million Californians who travel yearly to Mexico for affordable medical care vs thousands (?) of Canadians who travel to U.S. for better care at more affordable costs than in Canada?
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement