Letters to the editor
A Round of Applause For New Ha'Penny Stage
Editor, Times-Dispatch:
What a pleasant surprise to see the new Ha'Penny Stage in Byrd Park. We went to an afternoon performance celebrating Chinese culture, which was superb. The new stage is higher so one can see better and the backdrop is high enough that performers can stage themselves without being seen. Simple concepts, but they add tremendously to the audience's enjoyment.
What really impressed us, however, was moving the stage out of direct sun. No more sitting in the broiling sun and shading one's eyes to see the performance. Finally someone thought to relocate the stage slightly and now performers and audience alike have shade. Even more surprising was provision of chairs for the audience. This was an unusually large crowd with many older-than-usual patrons and the Dogwood Dell staff made a good call in providing chairs. I hope they continue to do so when the audience warrants it.
I also hope that these Chinese performers come back next year, perhaps even to the main stage at Dogwood Dell. They certainly are Dell-worthy. From the aerial antics of the martial artists to the charming dances of little girls in red overalls, it was a delightful and inspiring performance and a great kickoff for the improved venue.
I am glad that in this day of reduced budgets and service cut-backs, the city recognizes the importance of the Festival of Arts and continues not only to support it, but to offer improvements. Thanks Richmond Parks and Recreation, and keep up the good work.
Elaine Lidholm.
Richmond.
Quality Health Care Belongs to All Americans
Editor, Times-Dispatch: In his letter, "Can The Government Beat This Health Care?" L.E. Nugent says he is perfectly satisfied with his health insurance. Millions of Americans, including myself, are lucky to have quality health insurance they (or their employers) can afford. However, the big picture is a different story and the health reforms being debated in Congress have become a necessity.
Over the past eight years, health care costs have skyrocketed, with premiums for employer-based family coverage rising more than five times faster than average U.S. earnings. Pre-existing condition restrictions, caps on coverage, and higher deductibles and co-pays have put a significant strain on family budgets. In 2008, over 13 million Americans with insurance spent over 25 percent of their family income on health care costs. More than one-half of all personal bankruptcy cases are due, at least in part, to illnesses and medical costs.
People without access to employer-based coverage have to shop in the individual health insurance market. These expensive policies have even more limits and higher out-of-pocket costs. Many applicants cannot obtain a policy at any price, just because they have been sick in the past.
Forty-six million Americans, including 9 million children, are living without health care coverage. Every year, especially during this recession, more hard-working families join the ranks of the uninsured. Over the past 15 years, the percentage of uninsured workers in Virginia has gone up nearly 16 percent.
This is why a solid majority of Americans supports health reform. The proposals in Congress will allow Nugent to keep his private insurance while they help all Americans get quality, affordable insurance. Everyone will be a part of the system, and no one will have to fear that one accident or illness will leave them unable to care for themselves or their families.
Jill Hanken.
Richmond.
McAuliffe Invigorated Virginia Politics
Editor, Times-Dispatch: So, he parachuted in carrying his carpetbag? Who cares? He was one heckuva candidate. Whatever happened to Terry McAuliffe?
The carpetbagger tag seemed a favorite. The parachuting-in line was another. Connections to Bill Clinton came to be spoken of as a disease. Yet McAuliffe didn't have to spend what has to be millions of his own money on his campaign. He didn't have to decide that just maybe he had something to offer his home state of the past 20 years.
But he did all of that and much, much more.
Whoever heard of a candidate having a business plan of six chapters (123 pages) of detailed, specific, and knowledgeable proposals for education, transportation, economic security, energy, and job creation? Plus, there was a chapter on the question that so many people asked: How was he going to pay for all the promises? Chapter 6 told how.
His plan is full of viable, creative ideas about where the jobs could come from. The problem? No one I've met had read the business plan.
The incredible endorsement of The Washington Post touted Creigh Deeds as the "Transportation Governor" but his Web site didn't mention transportation and Brian Moran's mention was tepid. McAuliffe had a 26-page plan of up-to-date information even down to proposals for the Obama transportation stimulus money.
He sees things differently because he hasn't been involved in state government. He is mystified by what he sees as Virginia's failure to be innovative, to be the most attractive state for new businesses and industries. He urged Virginia to match and exceed incentives that are working for other states.
Part of the charm of Sen. Mark Warner is his sense of humor. McAuliffe seemed to be from that mold. He remained good-humored while Moran became angry and attacked him -- from the February Jefferson-Jackson Democratic Dinner on regularly for four months. Typically, the concession video of McAuliffe was upbeat. He said he wouldn't give anything for the experience of running, that he'd had a great time.
And you know what? I'll bet he did. Nancy St.Clair Finch. Richmond.
Chesterfield Supervisors Ask Necessary Questions
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Hooray for the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors' questioning of the Chesterfield School Board. It is clear the School Board does not like the questions. It has been a long time coming that someone is actually asking how our tax dollars are spent.
In the past, the School Board had one way of balancing a budget and that was to find a new program or project to spend any surplus. Many school systems are required to maintain a certain surplus in order to handle years like this one. Even the state has a rainy-day fund. Why not one for the Chesterfield school system?
Marleen Durfee is my representative on the Board of Supervisors and I commend her for the pointed questions she is asking and pressing for redistricting to solve the overcrowding rather than an automatic assumption by the School Board that capital improvement dollars is the answer.
Robert Derrick.
Midlothian.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Studebaker: Yasser Arafat wins a Nobel Peace prize for working towards peace. You don’t see the problem or the irony with that or were you simply stating a fact without a point of view on it?
It said:
Spoken by a learned man that is a jock and keenly aware of all degrees of excellence of Nobel Laureates of Economics, or simply a jock, who knows not of what he utters, much less difference between a “win” and an “award”? His comment mirrors his degree of knowledge
It still misses the point. It still looks down its nose without understanding what its talking about. It doesn’t understand a large body of credible work that has lead to more prosperity than that of a NYT left wing college professor hack. But that’s o.k., that’s what we expect from it.
“Nobel Peace Prize winner Paul Krugman…Nobel Peace Prize winner Yasser Arafat….Nobel Peace Prize winner Al Gore….Nobel Peace Prize winner Jimmy Carter…dang, a Nobel Peace prize in this kind of company isn’t exactly a resume enhancer.” Posted by ( Randy ) ****
Yasser Arafat shared the 1994 Nobel Peace Prize with Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres & Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin “for their efforts to create peace in the Middle East”
The purpose of the Nobel Peace Prize is to draw attention to the effort, risk & sacrifice necessary for people to help bring about peace. And that flawed men & women, even scoundrels, can rise above the clamor and work towards peace.
All three of these men risked their lives for the peace. Yitzhak Rabin, “gave the last full measure of devotion” for the hope of peace. On November 4th 1995, Yitzhak Rabin was murdered by a radical right-wing Orthodox Jew who opposed the signing of the Oslo Peace Accords.
The 1993 Nobel Peace Prize was shared by Nelson Mandela & Wellem de Klerk, “for their work for the peaceful termination of the apartheid regime, and for laying the foundations for a new South Africa.
1979: Mother Teresa
The 1978 Nobel Peace Prize was shared by Egyptian President Anwar Sadat & Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin signing of the Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty.
On 6 October 1981, Anwar Sadat was murdered on strength of a fatwa approved by Omar Abdel-Rahman, who was later convicted in the U.S. for his role in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
For those interested here is a list of all Nobel Laureates:
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/index.html
Some guy uttered…“Hey, the point was that a Nobel Peace Prize just ain’t what it used to be when terrorists, inept presidents, and hucksters can win one. Paul Krugman couldn’t carry Milton Friedman’s jock.“....
Spoken by a learned man that is a jock and keenly aware of all degrees of excellence of Nobel Laureates of Economics, or simply a jock, who knows not of what he utters, much less difference between a “win” and an “award”? His comment mirrors his degree of knowledge.
MrRight—
—You’re 100% correct.. HSA’s are excellent.
BigPharma & ‘Fortune 500 Healthcare’ has congress in their back pocket.
I don’t have the answers, I’m just a peon working in the ‘backoffice’, but some of the data would make your head spin & your blood boil.
It’s not all the HMO’s fault though—the general public has made it a mandate to extend their lives through un-natural means.
I’d love nothing better than to live a healthy life until retirement and drop dead after a couple years and pass my estate to my children.
As we’re spending ludicrous amounts of money on healthcare(most attributes to the ‘evil HMOs’), the quality of life isn’t increasing that much.
Yes, I know there are countless examples of the good that comes from modern medicine, but we see less of the bad. There a lot of it, we just don’t see it for what it is.
binary1-
If HMO’s are the problem why not regulate or modify those.Everybody doesn’t have an HMO. I keep advocating HSA’a which help eliminate frivolous dr visits to an already overburdened system and introduce an antiquated idea formerly known as ‘personal responsibility.‘ Posters on this forum who advocate such are labeled as
mean spirited conservatives.(Note the tone and condescension of those that make that claim.)
HSA’s not only give me the freedom to control my own healthcare but provide a savings incentive as well.
It would be nice to hear from one of our resident healthcare experts on the feasibility of transitioning more people into these.There is no one size fits all.
FanTastic is SPOT ON..
Working on the Information Technology side of health care for over a decade, I can assure everyone that the HMO model has just started to get bad, and it’s getting worse.
There is a misconception that HMO have to control costs to make money. That’s just not how it works. HMO’s make more money when doctors bill for more. HMO’s make more money when you get more un-necessary tests. HMO’s make more money when you have to go to your GP to get a referral to go to a specialists, even in cases where it is clear that a GP can’t rectify the situation.
Here’s the key. HMO’s make a profit as a percentage of gross revenue.
The most profitable customer to an HMO is one with chronic health problems, not the person who drops dead of a heart attack at 43.
I’m a conservative who agrees more with the Republican party than the Democrats (although they are both lying scumbags), while I don’t trust the government to run ANYTHING (just tell me what Federal agency is doing a “bang up job” of anything!??!)..
Before we say that the Federal government HAS TO DO IT. Remember how health care was a couple generations ago:
1) More people died of preventable conditions, but more because modern medicine had no advanced far enough, not because of monetary issues
2) A large percentage of hospitals were non-profit institutions
3) Healthcare was expensive, but people were not going bankrupt solely because of medical bills on a large scale.
Just a few things to think about!
The “Obama Plan” is just ludicrous, it’s the “You’re with us, or against us”.
Let’s not forget why hospitals are building these ludicrously expensive facilities: HMO’s are paying for them, and you in turn are paying for the HMO’s
NEWSFLASH-Obama advisor David Axelrod says that Obama will not rule out healthcare tax hike.Google that,truth and fantastic.
I rest my case.
Question- if our compassionate liberal friends get their way, and Obamacare suddenly provides free healthcare for all 47 million uninsured Americans, how will the current number of healthcare facilities and workers handle the sudden influx of new patients without rationing or restricting services.
A public option is not the only solution,as a matter of fact it is the worst solution.
Hey, the point was that a Nobel Peace Prize just ain’t what it used to be when terrorists (Arafat), inept presidents (Carter) and hucksters (Gore) can win one. Paul Krugman couldn’t carry Milton Friedman’s jock.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement