Letters: Hinkle Column Marginalized Minorities
Satirical Hinkle Column Marginalized Minorities
Editor, Times-Dispatch: The satirical piece by Bart Hinkle, "McDonnell Thesis Barely Scratches the Surface," was certainly witty. Hinkle tied in McDonnell's very real Regent University thesis and his theories on working women and feminists as "the real enemies of the traditional family" and homosexuals as sinners with completely fabricated McDonnell essays on the "scandal" of misspelling and wrong verb usage. I can imagine Hinkle chuckling quietly to himself as he wrote.
I cannot imagine, however, the working women and gays in this state chuckling as well. In attempting to marginalize McDonnell's views, Hinkle brings to mind an entire history of good ole' boy ideas that have marginalized women and minorities for centuries.
M. Allyson Rainer.
Richmond.
Abandoned Child Deserves Better
Editor, Times-Dispatch: When I heard a newborn baby had been abandoned, my first thought was: How could a mother do such a thing? My next thought was, whoever carried and delivered this child was not a mother. She was just a female who got pregnant, decided she did not want the child, and got rid of the baby in a horrendous way.
Thank goodness, the child was found before anything else could happen to him. However, what could be more horrible than to be left naked outside with no assurance someone would come along to rescue him? I do not want to think of the possibilities.
Someone in the community must know a woman or young girl who appeared to be pregnant but no longer looks the same way. If so, whoever this person is should step forward with the information. The police need help to identify the child and to prosecute the mother.
In the meantime, a DNA test could be performed now on the baby so, when a possible suspect is identified, another DNA test could be done on her immediately to verify yes or no, she is the mother. If not, the police would continue to look and, if yes, the proceedings could start to prosecute her to the fullest extent of the law.
Margie Nolan Cowles.
Richmond.
Funding Tourism Helps Virginia
Editor, Times-Dispatch: In response to the editorial, "Tourism, Inc.," the following are facts:
- Tourism can help. In these difficult economic times, the loss of jobs and decreasing business revenue have had a devastating effect on budgets throughout Virginia. The tourism industry is an instant revenue generator. It has an immediate financial impact that is felt every time a visitor spends money in the state. The state has more than 9,000 small and large tourism-related businesses that employ more than 200,000 Virginians and contribute more than $1.2 billion in state and local tax revenue every year. The results of an economic study by Longwoods International Research proved that every dollar invested in Virginia tourism advertising has a $5 return in tax revenue alone in the same year.
- The call for increased funding for tourism is not to have the state government do the work for the industry, but rather to augment the already massive effort the industry has undertaken to self-fund advertising and product development throughout Virginia. These industry-specific taxes fund everything from infrastructure to destination marketing. Further funding of tourism will enhance these efforts and better position Virginia to compete in a now-global tourism market. Success will yield increased tax revenues for the commonwealth.
- Tourism has an economic impact that is felt in every city, town, county, and region of the state. If Virginia's tourism industry is to have the greatest possible economic benefit in terms of jobs and revenue, an investment must not only be made, but increased. States like Colorado have reversed cuts once they realized the dramatic negative impact those cuts had on their economy.
An investment in Virginia tourism is an investment in Virginia's economic future. The industry must remain vital, united, and competitive. Christopher M. Savvides, Chairman, Virginia Hospitality and Travel Association.
Richmond.
President's Speech Is Relevant to Children
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Many school districts pride themselves in teaching character education. One of the key values of character education is being responsible.
The decision by some school districts to forgo the president's address to students urging them to be responsible for their success in school shows a lack of responsibility. Allowing parents to have their children opt out of hearing the president is equally not responsible.
One of the key ways of teaching character is to see an effective role model discuss or demonstrate essential values. Regardless of how any individual feels about the president's policies, it is difficult to say that he has not been responsible for his success in school. As such, he represents an excellent model for being responsible for one's own school success.
By failing to have every student hear the president discuss the importance of responsibility, the schools are demonstrating a failure of character. One must question the schools' inability to show two other essential values -- integrity and judgment.
Steven J. Danish.
Richmond.
Minimum Wage Level Is Stifling Growth
Editor, Times-Dispatch: We are two years into this recession. Since 2007, the minimum wage has risen from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 an hour -- a 40-percent increase. However, I doubt there has been a 40-percent increase in productivity over that period. Moreover, this was done in the face of a declining economy.
I'm no economist, but the economics classes I did take taught me that there are prices beyond which no one will buy -- in this case businesses offering jobs. However, if the price drops, people start buying, or in this case businesses start hiring.
We all know that the credit crisis was the primary cause of this recession. My bet is that the steep increase in the minimum wage has made it worse and has made the safe jobs that people run to in recessions, like retail, unavailable to those who have lost their jobs.
While it would be unpalatable medicine, if the minimum wage were lowered back to $5.15, low-level jobs would reappear. For some, that might be the difference between being able to weather the storm until the economy improves or losing their home. Given that stark choice, my bet is many would choose any job at a lower pay rate if it meant that they could hold out until things improve.
Bret D. Stauffer.
Richmond.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
“and channel even more money from profits of greedy thieves into pockets of millions of Americans, where it belongs”....got that right.
How do you stop a thief robbing your house? You stop him. How? You know.
How do you stop non-regulated greedy thieving health insurance corporation? You stop them. How? Competition, preferably via a non-profit option, perhaps a coop, that has enough millions of enrollees to contract the mere paperwork of claims processing at max 5% to those insurers.
No. They’ll find it harder to pay CEO’s a billion+ $‘s, like United’s current and prior ones, but hey! Ain’t it suppose to be a free enterprise country? So, we the people ought to be allowed to form our own non-profit insurance entity. Since we already have two; Medicare and Federal Employee Health Benefits program; we’ll easily just use such options to compete the the bloody thieves, saving the billions of annual $‘s to go to policy holders via lower self-paid premiums or lower employer premiums that can result in savings to reward merit raises to employees.
Who would be so ignorant as to not support such freedom for Americans to spend less on insurance?
Where have I heard that before?
...“From each according to his ability, to each according to their need.“, Karl Marx
“I. Nothing in society will belong to anyone, either as a personal possession or as capital goods, except the things for which the person has immediate use, for either his needs, his pleasures, or his daily work.
II. Every citizen will be a public man, sustained by, supported by, and occupied at the public expense.
III. Every citizen will make his particular contribution to the activities of the community according to his capacity, his talent and his age; it is on this basis that his duties will be determined, in conformity with the distributive laws.“, Louis Blanc
“The principle applied in the U.S.S.R. is that of socialism: From each according to his ability, to each according to his work.“, Joseph Stalin
“...,and channel even more money from profits of greedy thieves into pockets of millions of Americans, where it belongs.“, thetruth?
“Since 2007, the minimum wage has risen from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 an hour—a 40-percent increase.”…Well, yes, but since Sep 1997 the minimum wage has risen from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 an hour—a 40% increase….over a full 12-year period of time.
$7.25 an hour = $14,500 per year for a full time employee, before 7.65% fica deductions. Could you live on $13,400 net income per year ($1,117/month before rent, food, clothing, health insurance)? Please. No comment about teenagers and our elderly working same jobs as 30-yr old adults would have to perform.
The truth, as reported today by Erin Burnett, a business news anchor, on Meet the Press, “Last year 58% of small employers gave out no wage increases due to rising health care insurance premiums. Large corporations have reported they are laying off more employees in order to afford rising cost of premiums to cover remaining employees.”
Job loss negatively impacting our future is impacting primarily due to higher health care delivery system rising costs of premiums, deductibles, and copays to profit a few corporations, at the expense of millions of Americans not and in the future; not, the puny $7.25 an hour wage. Focus on the main issue, reform its cost, be able to raise that little $7.25 wage to $10.00 minimum or more, and channel even more money from profits of greedy thieves into pockets of millions of Americans, where it belongs.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement