Correspondent: Drilling Offshore Makes Sense

» 5 Comments | Post a Comment



Drilling Offshore Makes Good Sense
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Marirose Pratt ["Offshore Drilling Is No Silver Bullet"] is either sadly misinformed or unwilling to acknowledge the inconvenient facts about our energy reality. Drilling off our coast is not a silver bullet, but it is silver buckshot. Virginia does have a chance to become energy independent if we put all of our resources in play.

Pratt confuses electric power with liquid fuels. Wind and solar plants produce expensive, intermittent electricity that must be backed up by new natural gas plants. The T. Boone-doggle proves my point: Even with a massive taxpayer subsidy from a billionaire, the $10 billion project can't be financed. Wind power requires extensive expansion of the electric transmission grid that is often blocked by the same groups Pratt counts as her friends.

The Atlantic offshore has substantial energy resources (8 billion barrels of oil and 70 trillion cubic feet of gas) that are sorely needed by the neighboring states, including Virginia. We import all of the crude oil (by tanker and barge) and 60 percent of the natural gas we need. We refine only 15 percent of the fuel we need. We also import 30 percent of the electricity we use. Virginia has ample coal resources and we may have substantial uranium resources.

The commercial and sport fishing industries in the Gulf of Mexico are vital to the Texas and Louisiana economies. The platforms serve as artificial reefs that support the marine environment. The same structures could also be the home for an offshore wind farm.

The myth of "green jobs" has been decimated. Spain is a classic example: For every "green job" created, more than two good jobs are destroyed. The Congressional Budget Office has told Congress that the various ration-and-tax schemes to promote "green jobs" will cost the U.S. economy dearly. In every case we will be losing net jobs.

A. G. Randol III.
Richmond.

Advertisement

 
View More: correspondent of the day,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by GuidoMcGinty on October 21, 2009 at 10:40 am

Virginia does have a chance to become energy independent if we put all of our resources in play.

If VA allows drilling, how does that ensure that the resources stay in VA?  Won’t it go to the highest bidder on the world market?

It’s not an argument against drilling but drilling at any magnitude won’t enable energy independence for the state.

Flag Comment Posted by greta on October 21, 2009 at 8:28 am

Ask an out-of-work-Spainard about “green jobs.“
And global egg on your face.

We do NOT have clean air or water, despite ann the regulations.
What we have in many instances are irreversible unintended consequences.
Sport.

Flag Comment Posted by notwhoyouthinkitis on October 21, 2009 at 8:14 am

“Your argument, like those of most liberals, is short sighted and just leaves the door open for more regulation to “fix” the problems you create.“

Wow, what gross scientific ignorance.  Typical conservative/libertarian short-sightedness too.  BTW, if it were not for regulations you would not have clean air or clean water now, sport.

Fossil-fuel costs from coal and oil: $120 billion per year.
Ref: National Academy of Science peer-reviewed report, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/science/earth/20fossil.html?_r=1&emc=eta1

EOS.

Flag Comment Posted by Jack Aubrey on October 21, 2009 at 7:29 am

Posted by ( notwhoyouthinkitis ) on October 21, 2009 at 5:25 am

The writer essentially ignores one of the primary reasons for “green” jobs: pollution from fossil fuels and its cost to health and the environment.  Talk about a one-sided viewpoint.

So you oppose Americans mining our own resources using state of the art methods that are far more environmentally friendly than those used in the middle east, the far east, and the banana republic of Venezuela? It’s OK for them to pollute, isn’t it?

Your argument, like those of most liberals, is short sighted and just leaves the door open for more regulation to “fix” the problems you create.

Flag Comment Posted by notwhoyouthinkitis on October 21, 2009 at 4:25 am

The writer essentially ignores one of the primary reasons for “green” jobs: pollution from fossil fuels and its cost to health and the environment.  Talk about a one-sided viewpoint.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement