Letters To The Editor: Liberals Love Utopia, Conservatives, Reality

» 10 Comments | Post a Comment



Liberals Love Utopia, Conservatives, Reality
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Your editorial, "Don'tcha Hate It?" provides a good description of the views of liberals and conservatives on hate crimes. Actually, a review of basic differences between the two political philosophies is in order now that liberals control power in Washington.

Liberalism is strongly rights-based, distrusts the private sector and capitalism, and supports utopian and statist ideas that it believes can help realize Heaven on Earth. "If any single thing identifies the modern radical mind," writes sociologist Robert Nisbet in Twilight of Authority, "it is the invariably negative reaction to private enterprise, profit, and competition." He also writes that "in its struggle for individual allegiance, the Western state has actually manufactured individualism . . . in the positive creation of individual rights, freedoms, and benefits," an argument that explains the proliferation of entitlement programs since the New Deal.

Conservatives, on the other hand, distrust the encroachment of the state and defend capitalism because it offers opportunities for all groups to improve their economic condition. They also embrace political institutions that foster slow, organic growth and not rapid tumultuous change that endangers society. Conservatives strongly support the values of pluralism, habit, tradition, custom, and prudence. Very importantly, like Edmund Burke and Alexis de Tocqueville in the past, modern conservatives view civil society and independent voluntary associations as a vital bulwark against the encroachment of the state and an important protector of our freedoms.

Lee Rice.
Richmond.



AARP Has No Political Favorites
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Ross Mackenzie got it wrong when he referred to AARP as "a hard-left lobby," in his recent column, "A Random Walk Through Events at Home and Far Afield." If he had done his homework he would have known that AARP has a long history of working with both parties whenever a piece of legislation is in the best interest of our members.

AARP supported the creation of a new prescription drug benefit in Medicare that was pushed by President George W. Bush with strong Republican support. In the current Congress, AARP supports several bipartisan bills, including HR1558 Pre-existing Condition Patient Protection Act, S979 Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP), HR1427 Biosimilar/Biogeneric biological products, S975 Seniors and Taxpayers Obligation Protection Act -- sponsored by congressmen and women from both parties. And the list could go on.

While AARP has not endorsed any of the major health care reform bills moving through Congress, it's clear that our present course is not sustainable. Without change, Medicare premiums will more than double in the next seven years, Medicare Part A costs will outpace revenues in the next eight years, and beneficiaries will continue having problems finding a doctor who will accept Medicare payments.

Several bills before Congress will strengthen Medicare by closing the Part D doughnut hole, reducing the costs for preventive care, increasing access to doctors by paying them fairly, and addressing the solvency problems in Part A by aggressively tackling waste, fraud, and abuse in the health care system.

If it's good for seniors, it will receive our support regardless of whether the idea is supported or opposed by the left or the right. Bill Kallio, Associate State Director/Communications, AARP Virginia.


Richmond.

Time for Boorish Behavior to End
Editor, Times-Dispatch: I was appalled by the rude behavior exhibited by Republican members of Congress in the health care address by President Barack Obama. Their boorish behavior only continues prominent examples of offensive manners that congressional Democrats exhibited during past speeches by Republican presidents.

Imagine the reaction by a principal or classroom teacher if an officer of the student government association was seen using a personal digital assistant during an address to a high school assembly by Rep. Eric Cantor.

Imagine the outcry that would ensue if this same assembly booed Cantor during his remarks. What would happen to the student who shouted "You lie!" to Cantor as he repeated his earlier view that Democrats "bought two car companies"?

Each of these disrespectful examples of behavior was exhibited during the president's address. We teach our children that responsible, thoughtful people should have differences of opinions and express them openly and with respect. It is past time for our elected officials, Democrats and Republicans, to lead by example. Our children deserve no less.

Timothy A. McDermott.
Ashland.

Advertisement

 
View More: letters to the editor,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Blackbird on September 20, 2009 at 3:32 pm

Ok, so here’s a question: IF
Obama tells the truth because his health care bill doesn’t “include” a health care for illegal aliens, but then is really lying because he doesn’t “Exclude” health care for illegals. 
What is the Republican plan for this?
Are you going to write in a clause that will exclude health care for illegals?  That sounds like what you want to do, now isn’t that kind of uncaring, and wouldn’t that leave an illegal with a heart attack ...dead?
So the sentence for illegal immigration is ...death.
So that is really a lie also, because excluding illegals from health care is not really an option.  It is not happening now, it is not going to happen reguardless of whether OBama is “lying” or not.  The issue of illegals needs to be addressed as a separate but important issue.  We cannot complete a health care bill that leaves them out, we cannot include a bill that leave them in.
What do we do, continue the lie?
Fix health care, fix immigration. Both important.

Flag Comment Posted by Blackbird on September 20, 2009 at 3:24 pm

“Liberals Love Utopia, Conservatives, Reality”

Wow, thanks now I understand the world a much better.  Liberals all live in fantasy world, and Conservatives are realist…..I this must have been written by a liberal because it is pure fantasy.

Flag Comment Posted by hahaha on September 19, 2009 at 1:35 pm

There is no doubt that right has their message clear - we’re for depriving people of access to health, massive corporate corruption and huge government bailouts.

The ONLY reason the left cant articulate a real alternative is that so many of them are just as beholden to the insurance industry as the right.

And YOU LIE! isnt any kind of critique. Its a stupid exclamation intended to distract people for focusing on the elephant in the room - that health care reform is an absolute necessity.

Flag Comment Posted by Randy on September 19, 2009 at 11:15 am

That’s a great characterization hahaha. It is a right wing noise machine - one that has grown louder and louder as the facts continue to emerge in an unflattering light against the president and the congress. The left remains in fumble formation with regards to clearly articulating what they’re doing with healthcare.

Flag Comment Posted by Frito Bandito on September 19, 2009 at 10:48 am

Right on!, Lee Rice.  Beautifully said.

Flag Comment Posted by greta on September 19, 2009 at 10:42 am

I agree that Wilson’s manners were questionable but his sentiments were right on the money.
Which is where citizens eyes should be at all times.
Unfortunately it seems that one segment of the population has to do all the due diligence.

“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of people under the pretense of taking care of them.“
          Thomas Jefferson

Flag Comment Posted by hahaha on September 19, 2009 at 9:56 am

The right wing noise machine never runs out of fuel.

You “suppose” since “most”? How about Wilson was a pig headed j*ck*ss that clearly represents the people manipulated by the right wing noise machine?

Flag Comment Posted by Question Govt on September 19, 2009 at 9:28 am

Lee Rice, without being accusatory or hateful, has drawn a thoughtful, insightful, and useful contrast between the two opposing political philosophies.

Flag Comment Posted by Randy on September 19, 2009 at 8:18 am

Hey, do you think that Mr. Kallio wrote his letter with a straight face? I haven’t seen a case of denial this pronounced since the Captain of the Titanic ignored iceberg warnings although far more people have escaped with their lives from AARP since May of this year than escaped the Titanic.

Flag Comment Posted by Randy on September 19, 2009 at 8:15 am

Timothy: There is excited discussion and debate as to whether Joe Wilson’s conduct was acceptable and that’s a good discussion to have. I suppose since most of us have concluded that Joe Wilson was right on the money with his assertion, his manners are the only thing left to debate.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement