Letters To The Editor, Continued: Liberals Want Level Playing Fields
Liberals Want Level Playing Fields
Editor, Times-Dispatch: I object to Lee Rice's false and insulting description of liberals in his letter, "Liberals Love Utopia, Conservatives Reality." Rice claimed that liberals support Utopian and statist ideas. He said they are radical and "hold negative views of private enterprise, profit, and competition."
What baloney. Liberals are mainstream citizens who believe government -- through our elected representatives -- must at times be called upon to even the playing field and provide corrective measures when corporations and Wall Street bankers contrive to make our private enterprise system a plutocracy.
Liberals know that real economic competition provides economic efficiencies (lower prices) but they also know that corporate leaders and businessmen do whatever they can to keep prices high. They hate competition. The president, for example, wants a public option in the health care reform package precisely because big insurance companies would have to compete against this lower-priced program. This would bring prices down for everyone (of course many Republicans couldn't care less if people go without good health insurance). The liberal president, Barack Obama, is encouraging competition and is not advocating a government takeover of health care -- no matter what GOP fear-mongers like Rep. Eric Cantor say.
Liberals are mindful that large governmental bureaucratic organizations can screw things up, but they also know that corporate bureaucracies can be just as wasteful. Just ask someone who works for a large corporation. Liberals love America, are not radicals, and are committed to making our private-enterprise system work for every economic status. In the case of health care, the large insurance companies have taken control of the marketplace and, consequently, most of our citizens are being taken to the cleaners.
John Schuiteman.
Ashland.
Outside Study Saves Money for Virginia
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Katie Whitehead's recent letter, "Let Uranium Studies Address Crucial Issues," questioned why state government isn't footing the bill for a National Academy of Sciences study of uranium mining.
Virginia is currently facing a $1.5 billion shortfall, which may grow over the coming months, and budget cuts include plans to lay off hundreds of state workers. At a time when the state is faced with eliminating jobs to balance the budget, decision-makers are wise to engage the National Academy to study an issue that could bring hundreds of well-paying jobs to a region that badly needs them. Southside Virginia (Danville, Martinsville, and Pittsylvania County in particular) have the state's highest unemployment numbers.
The National Academy of Sciences is an institution of Nobel laureates and our country's most esteemed academic and scientific experts. Their reputation is beyond reproach, and their research is conducted independently regardless of the source of funding. Virginians should welcome having the experts study the public health and environmental effects of uranium mining in Virginia, and trust that their findings will provide unbiased guidance to decisions of great importance to our energy future and our economy.
Heather Newcomb.
Lynchburg.
My Many Reasons Not to Trust Obama
Editor, Times-Dispatch: President Barack Obama seems to assiduously follow the Christian tenet, "love thine enemies." Unfortunately, he seems to feel that this means, "hate thy friends" as the obverse of the coin.
He has insulted our closest ally, Great Britain, by sending back a historically important bust of Winston Churchill that was given to us in empathy for our loss on 9/11. He gave Queen Elizabeth II an iPod with his speeches on it (hubris, anyone?). He interfered in the internal affairs of our only Middle Eastern ally, Israel.
And now he is trying to reinstall a would-be leftist dictator in Honduras who was ousted for breaking constitutional law in that country. Obama has sawed off the limb that our Eastern European allies Poland and Czechoslovakia went out on for us by abrogating a deal to give them a missile defense system. He has apologized with profuse mea culpas on behalf of the U.S. for wrongs -- real and imagined -- to such countries as France, Germany, Russia, Egypt, and Iran. Many of those countries' entire histories are rife with genocide and greed. He will not talk to those who disagree with him in his own country, yet he grins and hugs Hugo Chavez and eagerly awaits a chance to speak with the megalomaniacal president of Iran. He gives obeisance to a Saudi King whose country is rife with human trafficking and who winks at slavery and terrorism committed by his own citizens.
And he wonders why people like me neither understand him nor have any trust in his programs for us.
Glenn Russell.
Aylett.
Does Governor Worry Over Obama's Friends?
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Gov. Tim Kaine said that he was shocked that Speaker of the House William Howell asked for fund-raising help from Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina. Kaine's comment was: "You're known by the company you keep."
What does he have to say about President Barack Obama's latest radical czar who recently resigned, and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whom the president associated himself with? Does Kaine have any comment?
John Brown.
Sandston.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Corporations Wasted Estimated 43% of Sports Tickets Last Year
Because of inefficiencies, starting at how companies hold and manage the ticket process, 43 percent of tickets bought by corporations went unused in 2008
http://www.cnbc.com/id/33182576
I thought this was interesting and relavant to the discussion of gov’t vs. business.
We read daily on this forum of people complaining how corrupt, how inefficient gov’t is, and how great business is at keeping cost down….
I am not saying gov’t is great at it, but I really don’t think business is that great either. Business is able to cover it better, is LESS acountable.
They just pass the cost on to customers..plain and simple…can gov’t do that? No , they have to vote on it and take it through Congress as a tax increase. So who is more accountable?
Who actually pays for these sports tickets? Think about it for a minute.
It’s the same people who pay taxes. It’s us, consumers and stockholders.
I would say everyone in the US is a CONSUMER, and a large majority of people are stock holders in companies that they have little control over.
Many people own IRA’s and 401K’s that have hundreds of stocks in US companies, but who really keeps tabs on these companies?
The Board of Directors? We found out through ENRON and WorldCom and many other companies that there is a breakdown in company oversite.
I need some good reason to believe in Health Care Insurance companies. No, I am not a big believer in Gov’t Health Care, but BIG BUSINESS HEALTH CARE IS NOT ANY BETTER. So let’s quit trying to defend the indefensible…and solve this problem and MOVE ON! Congress, pull up your sleves with doctors, insurance companies and patients…and let’s get our system working for our countries sake. We can’t sit by and let people go bankrupt and die because
we are afraid of change.
Yodasghost, none of the replies here said word one about Northrup-Grumman, so your argument is entirely manufactured.
What exactly does “style of corporate profit taking” mean? And if it’s the norm for “such institutions” it wouldn’t be one company’s “style.“ Your point is a non sequitur.
I think you’re just echoing some anti-business rhetoric without any real understanding of how business works.
drhoagie wrote”“Liberals know that…corporate leaders and businessmen do whatever they can to keep prices high. They hate competition.”
Wasn’t it our corporate leaders who lowered the cost of a calculator from $400 to $4.00? Or cell phone coverage from $100/month to $29.99 unlimited? “
Actually, NO.
Competition, and innovation did that. And for the most part it was foreign competition as Asian factories churned out the latest models worldwide, and due to the current laws like NAFTA and laws like it, to compete, other companies, especially domestic ones, to sell anything, have to match prices.
In fields where there is no competition, especially in the service sector (Health care is mostly service sector work) which is almost 100 percent domestic due to regulatory laws that keep foreign competition out, prices are high due to the lack of competition.
Seems most of the replies here support Corporations like Northrup-Grumman running everything, and when the Government (Elected by the people to represent the people) attempts to level the field, Conservatives sudden desire Northrup-Grumman types over the folks we elect.
And anyone who thinks Northrup- Grumman’s style of corporate profit taking is not the norm for such institutions is sorely mistaken.
No one doubts that liberals want a “level playing field”. It’s just that they tend to bring the level of the field down instead of raising everyone up. One just has to look at how little high school graduates know now upon graduation than we did just 35 years ago, or how they have defined everyone based on the lowest common denominator, their sexual nature.
If you are going to level the playing field, raise up the individual, don’t bring the rest of society down to your level.
And the angriest partisans say “Boo-hoo”.
“Liberals…der-der-der”, “Conservatives…blah-blah-blah”, “Socialism…Czar, czar, czar”.
Do they put fluoride in your drinking water? The democracy saves you for some reason, but the rhetoric betrays those sensibilities as lacking.
And Dear angry partisans,
Will you go away if I give you the points for tit-and-tat? I heard that the people you hate, hate you, but you’re the real America, they hate America too.
“Liberals know that…corporate leaders and businessmen do whatever they can to keep prices high. They hate competition.”
Wasn’t it our corporate leaders who lowered the cost of a calculator from $400 to $4.00? Or cell phone coverage from $100/month to $29.99 unlimited?
Or how about the HDTV that was $3000 a few years ago.
You can now get a HDTV for $600.
These prices were all voluntarily lowered by corporate leaders without a hostile, illegal government takeover or an unelected and unconfirmed “czar” meddling in private industry.
I wish liberals were more of a challenge to refute.
John Schuiteman objects to a false and insulting description of liberals, and then proceeds to state a false and insulting description of Republicans. Oh well, nothing new about that form of argument.
The more interesting statement he makes is “Liberals know that…corporate leaders and businessmen do whatever they can to keep prices high. They hate competition.” This is a surprising admission of liberal ignorance and arrogance from someone who apparently intends to defend their honor. So what Mr. Schuiteman asserts is that liberals view capitalism as a one-dimensional model in which amoral businesspeople wield unilateral control over prices to enrich themselves and oppress consumers. Only someone who has never met a payroll would entertain such a simplistic fantasy. Someone who never took a risk with his own money to start a business to deliver a valuable product or service to the community. Someone who never deprived himself of an income while making sure his employees were able to support their families.
Mr. Schuiteman, corporate leaders and businessmen do whatever they can to compete as effectively in the marketplace as they can, in the face of numerous and ever-changing challenges that sometimes present an existential threat. Sure, you can find examples of abuses by businesspeople. You’ll also be able to find countless examples of consumers cheating and lying to get something for nothing. Does that indict all consumers?
I agree that Acorn has serious problems and needs to be thoroughly investigated and reformed, but I wonder how they amanged to influence the election in MN. Collecting fraudulent voter registrations, then pointing the fact out themselves is one thing, but how did they get these non existant folks to actually go and vote? If you register Mickey Mouse as a voter, you still have to get Mickey Mouse to attend a poling booth and show some ID before voting.
This is how liberals “level the playing field”. Obama send his fraudulent ACORN to Minnesota to register 47,000 “new” voters. MN was a key state for a Democrat controlled Senate to push through the unpopular socialized health care takeover.
Send lawyers to MN when their guy loses. Recount and recount and recount until the “results” fit your liking.
Then “win” in the courts by just over 300 votes.
We all know Obama’s ACORN is a fraudulent and criminal organization. IF ACORN only had 1% of fraudulent voters registered, that is 470 fraudulent votes. Enough to win the entire election.
We all know if Obama’s ACORN was involved, 1% of fraudulent votes is a VERY VERY conservative estimate.
Leveling the playing field some would call that.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement