Letters: Are Politicians Putting Own Careers First?
Are Politicians Putting Own Careers First?
Editor, Times-Dispatch: So the VITA/Northrop Grumman deal has problems.
The only reason for privatizing a public service is to open up the de facto government monopoly to private-sector competition, thus reducing cost (or inefficiency). For this contract, if memory serves, Gov. Mark Warner in his last months in office rammed through a $2 billion deal with only two bidders, one of whom dropped out. So much for competition.
Only a handful of concepts are salient in privatization, such as the "yellow pages test," asset ownership, transaction costs, and adverse information. While a successful contractual relationship is always a two-way street, a poorly wrought or hastily executed contract is not the bidders' fault.
Not all public services are necessary or desirable. Big government tends to force monopolies on the citizens and becomes self-necessitating as the scale of its centralized services will preclude the letting of highly competitive private-sector contracts.
Neither should all public services be outsourced -- I believe even the quintessentially laissez-faire economist Milton Friedman concluded transportation belongs in the public sector.
Finally, a politician who finds privatization or for that matter any policy decisions difficult, whether the final decisions are yea or nay, due to lobbying pressures is clearly stating his career is more important than doing what is right for the public.
John Schuler.
Richmond.
Should Virginia Women Trust Bob McDonnell?
Editor, Times-Dispatch: In July, this newspaper admitted its regret for support of Massive Resistance: "Yesteryear's words cannot be revoked . . . . They belong to history, and history lives. It is well and good that the words be remembered, as a warning perhaps best," an editorial said. Just as the Editorial staff looks to its past as warning, we urge it to remember the past words and deeds of gubernatorial candidate, Bob McDonnell.
In McDonnell's now infamous thesis at what is now Regent University, he wrote of the detrimental effect of working women on family. Then, in 1989, McDonnell reinforced his low opinion of working women by voting against "equal pay for equal work." During his entire career, McDonnell's poor regard for women revealed itself in his unwavering view on abortion. He advocates no abortion, even for females pregnant by rape or incest.
Should citizens of Virginia, especially its women, trust McDonnell because he was only 34 when he wrote his thesis? Although I hope his attitude toward females has improved because of time spent with his wife and his daughters, I am skeptical that his evolution has been very significant. His voting record and obstinacy regarding abortion speak to little change.
Before
The Times-Dispatch crows too loudly about former Gov. Doug Wilder's failure to endorse gubernatorial candidate Creigh Deeds, let us consider how Wilder left the City of Richmond. No citizen of the city -- no matter race, ethnic background, or creed -- was proud of Wilder's arrogance or his wasteful spending when he barred School Board employees from their jobs and attempted to evict the school administration from City Hall. Virginia's pride in the nation's first elected black governor turned to ashes as he displayed small-mindedness and obstinacy as mayor. Will no endorsement hurt Deeds? I doubt it.
C. Nancy Cook.
Richmond.
We Should Insist Congress Read Bills
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Until recently, I actually thought members of Congress read bills before voting on them. Then last month, I watched on TV as one congressional committee member laughingly asked if anyone had read the different health care proposals that are circulating on the Hill. A congressional representative on the same committee quickly voiced her disapproval of the sarcastic quip and admonished her colleague who made the statement -- saying the people deserved better.
The congressional representative is right. Voting on legislation without have read an entire bill should be a crime. This goes for every piece of proposed legislation, not just the health care legislation currently at issue.
We elect men and women to go to Washington to represent us. They are paid employees of the people. Their job description includes proposing legislation, studying proposed legislation, and serving on and attending meetings of committees. They are to engage in debate on proposed legislation, and, when appropriate, to vote. While paid, they are not tenured. Members of Congress, like all workers, must be responsible to their employer (the American taxpayers) for carrying out their job duties. Whether a corporate executive or a worker at the corner book store, one must show up and do the job he or she is being paid to do. Members of Congress are no different. As our employees, they must do the work they are paid to do and they must be accountable. I suggest a system that identifies and disqualifies votes by representatives who have not read the legislation. If a congressman cheats, three strikes and he or she is out (of a job). David H. Worrell Jr. Bon Air.
Reader Reactions
Three well-written letters.
Mr. Worrell-Thank you for a very well constructed and intelligent opinion.
All bills that affect the well being of American citizens should be read and comprehended by the civil servants that said citizens have entrusted with that duty.
It seems, unfortunately that the crucial “Bill” very much in today’s news is incomprehensible. I
I heard it referred to, no later than this morning,as “gibberish.“
This appears to be one of the main reasons why certain legislators do not want it aired on C-SPAN so that the public at large and the lawmakers themselves could view for themselves that it is a boondoggle.
Two items that have filtered out this morning, there is still $200 million dollars needed to fund the bill. That sum is to come from “other sources.“ And some 20 million people will remained uninsured.
A Pass and Play Bill.
I was also astonished to learn that Harry Reid has his own bill that he was going to attach to a second bill and spirit it through with virtually no one being the wiser.
I am quite sure it is not that simple.
And I am also quite sure that Harry Reid did not invent the process nor was the first to consider doing it.But I do know that I am going to spend some time to research this, to me, new development as thoroughly as I can.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement