More Letters to the Editor: Things Aren’t Looking Good for Iran or Israel

» 12 Comments | Post a Comment



Things Aren't Looking Good for Iran or Israel
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Israel has been threatened with being wiped off the face of the Earth by Iran. Israel is well aware that Iran is deadly serious about carrying out this threat. Iran has demonstrated that it has rocket weaponry capable of striking Israel. Most Western nations believe Iran to be very close to developing atomic bombs that could quickly destroy such a small country as Israel.

Iran's nuclear facilities are constructed far below ground, deep enough that conventional bombs would be unable to destroy them. A nuclear bomb burst will contaminate the surrounding area to such an extent that the area is uninhabitable for decades. There is no weapon in Israel's arsenal that will negate Iran's ability to destroy Israel other than small nuclear weapons whose destructive ability is limited in scope to render relatively small areas of land uninhabitable.

As a last resort to save itself from annihilation, guess what Israel will do in the near future.

Frank Solari.
Richmond.



EFCA Does Not Benefit All Virginians
Editor, Times-Dispatch: The Op/Ed column, "EFCA Would Benefit Virginians," by Ann C. Hodges struck a sour chord with me. Her opinion of the Employee Free Choice Act appeared theoretical and not the least bit realistic.

Small businesses are the backbone of America. They provide the wages that enable their workers to support themselves and their families and to live a productive life. Hodges wrote: "Workers have not shared in the prosperity that they have created." I beg to differ.

For one thing, they did not create it. The creators were those who had the initial idea for the business, took all the financial risks to start the company, and put in all the hours getting it off the ground. Many companies do not show a profit for years, plowing proceeds back into the business and paying their employees in many cases before themselves.

She further asserted that worker "spending was fueled by debt and the economy has suffered as a result." Everyone needs to live within his or her means. Save for that special vacation, high-cost HDTV, new car, or whatever. Not being able to keep up with the Joneses does not justify unionizing at will.

When outside people come into a business to negotiate a larger share of profits earned by the risktakers and employers, it is frankly an insult to the free enterprise system. America stands as the land of opportunity. Successful employers who took that opportunity should be rewarded for their efforts -- not penalized.

Barbara A. Gestwick.
Richmond.



Free Speech Might Embolden Fringe
Editor, Times-Dispatch: I enjoyed the news story on Samuel Moore, who unfurled a distasteful Obama-bashing banner from the roof of his business establishment in Shockoe Bottom. Elsewhere in the same day's paper, it was reported that some as-yet-unidentified person(s) posted a "should we kill Obama?" poll on a Facebook page. Does Moore fail to see how his free speech emboldens members of the lunatic fringe, who may think it's just fine to shoot a socialist, or does he not care what his free speech incites?

A bystander who was interviewed at the Shockoe Bottom protest speculated that the strip-club business might be slow these days. Perhaps some other local business person will now create a sensational banner with Charles Manson's face superimposed on Moore's mug shot with the word "criminal" in big black letters. After all, where's the harm in that?

Anne D. McDougall.
Ashland.



Presidential Cartoons Come With the Job
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Since George Washington swore an oath of office in 1789, presidents have been pilloried by political cartoonists and protesters.

The caricature of President Barack Obama recently displayed outside a Richmond strip club serves as a reminder that Americans are entitled to freedom of expression regardless of the medium used. I may not approve of it, but I defend the artist's right to exercise a right granted to all citizens of our country -- regardless of their race, religion, creed, or background.

Lee Anderson.
Powhatan.



It's About Politics, Not Racism
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Ever since there has been politics in America there have been unflattering cartoons of political figures. President Barack Obama is no exception and no exception should be made for him.

African-Americans need to recognize the fact that there will be unflattering images and rhetoric regarding his political actions, and the fact that Obama is black has nothing to do with it. He is our president and, as Americans, we have the right to express our displeasure with our politicians in any way that is not overtly threatening.

White Americans should not be required to walk on eggshells for fear of offending the sensibilities of some blacks. The poster is a political statement, not a racist one.

Gene Payne.
Henrico.



McDonnell Applied Civil War-Era Laws
Editor, Times-Dispatch: The geniuses of the Editorial Page tore into gubernatorial candidate Creigh Deeds for sliming the fair Bob McDonnell -- and noted McDonnell "has built a record of pragmatic accomplishment, both in the House of Delegates and as attorney general."

Oh, really? You noted that McDonnell's thesis at Pat Robertson's (now) Regent University -- a well-known bastion of clear thinking -- is fair game. But then you note that the document is 20 years old, in an effort to subtly imply it's not really fair game.

That might be true if he had really moved beyond that kind of thinking. But McDonnell was in his 30s when he wrote it.

He showed his true colors when he intervened in the dispute between the Episcopal Church and a group of breakaway conservative Anglican congregations. He cited the applicability of a Civil War-era law in the case. Virginia is the only state in this dispute where this kind of government intervention has occurred. Here's what he said: "As a matter of federal constitutional law, the Episcopal Church is simply wrong. The Constitution does not require that local property disputes be resolved by deferring to national and regional church leaders."

Tim Kaine does not believe in capital punishment, but as governor he has refrained from letting his beliefs interfere with his duties to the citizens of the commonwealth. McDonnell has failed that test miserably. So whom do we really have to fear, Deeds or McDonnell?

Thomas M. Baker.
Richmond.



Cantor's Approach Is Refreshing
Editor, Times-Dispatch: I enjoyed attending the recent Public Square on health care reform. I found the meeting very informative and I find Rep. Eric Cantor's approach to health care reform very refreshing.

Instead of proposing big-government spending programs, he outlined some of the root causes of escalating health care costs, like the lack of competition. He made numerous suggestions, such as allowing people to buy health care insurance across state lines, which is not permitted today. He also wants to level the playing field by extending tax deductions for health insurance to small businesses and to individuals. He also addressed the importance of tort reform in addition to addressing the waste and fraud in the Medicare system. Cantor expressed the feelings of many Americans who are tired of the runaway and often wasteful spending we witness in Washington.

I stand with him in the belief that Democrats' health care reform proposals will just add to this problem. Before we start spending billions more dollars on an unproven idea, we should take these cost-saving steps that can and will help solve our health insurance challenges.

Nancy Russell.
Montpellier.

Advertisement

 
View More: letters to the editor,cont''d,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Blackbird on October 12, 2009 at 11:57 am

Just as Bush represents one side of the story, Obama represents another side of the story. Where is the other side of the story in IRAN, you think EVERYONE IN IRAN is the same?
You think everyone in IRAN want’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to be President?
I don’t know a whole lot about IRAN, I will admit it. Scott Peterson knows alot more than me I am sure, but what I do know is that people are people.
They are not all crazy religious fanatics, even if they live in IRAN. Even if they are Muslim.
Iran has a long history, I don’t know it all, but I know it goes back before
1979.  I know that Persians have been trying to take over the world for a long time, but they also have provided alot of culture to the Eastern and Western world. I am much more concerned about Pakistan…which IS an ISLAMIC state that acutally HAS NUKES. Pakistan was created as an Islamic state , no? 
Just as a side note, if you went to the Folk Festival here in Richmond, there was music from Iran, they called it Persian Prayer Music.  It was actually kind of “happy” sounding music (as least compared with Greek “party” music..which sounded extremely sad) .  The people who played it seemed very mellow.  The woman were not veiled.  Here’s a link for you to follow that may give you reason to not be so caught up in this death wish.
http://www.cpcm.com/index.html
“Poetry is the most important art form in Iran. It’s the backbone of our culture,“
How can a country where Poetry is the backbone of it’s culture be ready to annihilate itself?
We need to ask questions and find answers, not rely on familiar quotes of unpopular Iranian Presidents.
PSS..why is he called “President” anyway?

Flag Comment Posted by mrright on October 10, 2009 at 4:09 pm

Blackbird- I’m sure you realize the ‘what-if ‘scenario you imagine is EXACTLY what Ahmadinjad hopes to initiate.
Read the link Greta provided.
You cannot trust OR negotiate with a mad man.Even if you’re Obama.
So I for one am busy wringing my hands.
You go ahead and hope for the best.

Flag Comment Posted by greta on October 10, 2009 at 3:27 pm

Blackbird-There is an excellent article by scott peterson in the Christian Science Monitor, titled
Waiting for the rapture in Iran.

It is an eye opener. And very scary. It explains why Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is
particularly dangerous.
If you are still skeptical read a few of Ahmadinejad’s speeches.
He is deadly serious about establishing a global Islamic Caliphate. A holocaust fits right in with his plans..
The last thing he would ever do is to make friends with the United States.
Although that was a very clever ending to your post.

Flag Comment Posted by Blackbird on October 10, 2009 at 12:57 pm

PS.
Has anyone really considered Iran’s position?  They could be wiped of the map right now by Israel?
Or doesn’t that count?  It doesn’t count that Israel has atomic weapons that could wipe out Iran. It doesn’t mater that Israel doesn’t belong to the IAE. It doesn’t mater that Israel isn’t part of the nuclear non-poliferation treaty?  It doesn’t mater that other countries in the neigborhood of Iran…namely Indian and Pakistan ALSO have atomic weapons and are ALSO not signatories of the non-proliferation treaty?
What would you do if you were IRAN?

I would make friends with the US.

Flag Comment Posted by Blackbird on October 10, 2009 at 12:39 pm

Frank Solari really believes all the hype. Why would Iran really want to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.
Who ever really believes this is living in an apocalyptic fantasy brought on by over indulgence in Defense spending.
Why do we spend so much on Defense…to wipe out countries that wipe out other countries. I guess that is a tax dollar well spent ..it’s called deterrence. It worked with a much more powerful country called Russia. It won’t work on Iran?
While one atomic bomb may wipe out a city in Israel, it would take several I imagine to destroy the whole country.
Meanwhile, what would be the future of Iran after they did this. What possible sense would it make. What possible scenario would cause them to make the suicidal aggressive offensive action that would be totally condemned the world over.  There would be no holding back the worlds armies who are just seething for a reason to attack Iran.  Make no mistake this is all possible but Highly highly highly unlikely.  Iran’s leader may be off his rocker, but Iran’s people are not, they don’t want to die in a nuclear apocalypse anymore then we do, even if they did happen to wipe Israel off the face of the map.  Iran would follow shortly there after.  It is a stupid proposition. No one ever really thinks about this stuff do they.  They just continue to wring their hands and say “it could happen”....well a pig could fly also…if it was on an airplane.

Flag Comment Posted by thetruth on October 07, 2009 at 1:17 pm

“Cantor expressed the feelings of many Americans who are tired of the runaway and often wasteful spending we witness in Washington.“?

Health insurance premiums increased 78% during the six years of 2001-2007 while he and his Party controlled Washington and during said six years inflation increased 17%, while wages increased 19%, would have been nice if Eric had addressed “runaway” cost of premiums most of us can surely agree is wasted dollars from our compensation packages.  That $13,400 annual premium for one employee’s family coverage, heading toward $30,000 by 2019 comes directly off the top of each employee’s income.  Judging from only 19% total left over for all of six years to devote to merit increases, I think most of us feel there is a big WASTE of our hard-earned income, pirated by greedy insurers supported by Mr. Cantor.

What did he say about those runaway costs and wasteful spending?  Nuttin, cause he supports it.

Flag Comment Posted by GuidoMcGinty on October 07, 2009 at 12:26 pm

http://www.readingcomprehensionconnection.com/lesson.php

Flag Comment Posted by greta on October 07, 2009 at 11:40 am

Tort reform is not a red herring for doctors.
Republicans despise lawyers?

Flag Comment Posted by greta on October 07, 2009 at 11:36 am

There will be no war in the Middle East.
It is not on the administrations schedule.
Fundamentally reforming America from the ground up has proven a more formidable task that at first anticipated.
Those irritating citizens keep dissenting and disagreeing and being generally un-coporative.
So the Mullahs will have to just put their nukes on ice until the gang that can’t get anything done gets ahead of the learning curve and has time for tea and a chat..Again.

Flag Comment Posted by GuidoMcGinty on October 07, 2009 at 11:25 am

Ms. McDougall:

Perhaps some other local business person will now create a sensational banner with Charles Manson’s face superimposed on Moore’s mug shot with the word “criminal” in big black letters. After all, where’s the harm in that?

Where indeed.  I’m not seeing your point considering this country’s Bill of Rights.


Ms. Russell:

He (Cantor) also addressed the importance of tort reform

Well, if Cantor was honest (unlikely considering his career choice), then he would have said that tort reform has little bearing on health care costs today.  It’s a red herring for republicans that despise lawyers.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement