Letters to the Editor continued

» 5 Comments | Post a Comment

Project Developer Wants No Community Input

Editor, Times-Dispatch

Regarding your editorial, "Condo-Nundrum": Nothing about the Oakwood Heights project that was denied by the Committee for Architectural Review has been a collaborative process that grew from the ground up.

Neighbors in the Chimborazo Historic District have made numerous attempts to work with the developer to address community concerns so that the project could move forward with community support. There are ways to construct this development to the scale of 33 units that minimize the impact of the development on the existing residents.

The developer has been completely unwilling to modify her designs to address the community's primary concerns regarding the impact of traffic and parking associated with the development. For example, at a presentation before the Church Hill Association, the developer's representatives started the meeting by stating that the site plan was not negotiable and that nothing the members said would make a difference.

Kristen Hughes. Richmond.

Thanks to Loophole, Felons Might Buy Guns

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms says that gun shows are the second leading source of guns used in crimes in America.

There are approximately 5,000 gun shows in the United States each year, and in 35 states, including Virginia, anyone -- even a felon -- can buy a gun without a background check from private, unlicensed dealers.

More than 87 percent of Americans support closing the gun show loophole. Also, 83 percent of gun owners are in favor of closing the loophole on background checks.

Prior to 2004, there was a 10-year federal ban on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines (larger than 10 rounds). This ban was allowed to lapse in 2004. It needs to be reinstated now. The Virginia Tech gunman easily bought a high-capacity ammunition magazine, which had been covered by the federal ban, and used it in his deadly shooting spree.

Federal legislation called the Tiahrt Amendment, which prohibits the sharing of crime gun trace data between police departments and law enforcement, also needs to be overturned. Every police station in the nation wants the law overturned.

I was somewhat surprised to learn that private sellers are wandering around gun shows holding up hand-written signs reading, "For Sale: Rifles, shotguns, and assault rifles. Cash and carry -- no questions asked." They could well be selling guns to a felon or terrorist.

Please contact your representative in the General Assembly and tell him to close the loophole this year. I am not against hunters, recreational shooters, guns for private protection, or gun collectors. I am against people hunters.

Jim Severt. Martinsville.

GOP Should Tell The Whole Truth

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

In his letter, "Democrats Came Late to Civil Rights," Emmett Dene is correct to claim that Republicans were responsible for the important civil rights measures between 1966 and 1875. But while Republicans were first in, they were also the first out. Democrats may have come late to civil rights, but Republicans left early and stayed away far longer.

Once Republicans realized they no longer needed Southern electoral votes to win the White House, they felt free to abandon African-Americans to their fate at the hands of the Democratic solid South. Republican presidents from Rutherford B. Hayes to Benjamin Harrison (1876-1892) failed to effectively enforce federally protected civil and political rights in the South -- in large part because Republicans in Congress refused to provide the necessary resources. These same Republicans in the early 1890s repealed the Enforcement Acts of 1870-71 (what Dene called the Civil Rights Act of 1870), agreeing that by this time the laws were "dead letters."

Moreover, it was a Supreme Court of mostly Republicans that in 1883 ruled the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional, came up with the "separate but equal" doctrine in 1896 that upheld "Jim Crow" segregation laws, and gave the green light to Southern states to use devices such as the poll tax, literacy tests, and the white primary to disenfranchise black voters.

Republicans in the North did support Civil Rights Era legislation, but more telling is the fact that Republicans have consistently opposed extension of such laws as the Voting Rights Act of 1965 ever since. With President Barack Obama in the White House, the loss of several Southern states, and a Democratic Congress, Southern Republicans apparently now seek to re-establish their credibility by rewriting their past and blaming the "educational establishment" for not telling the whole truth.

Robert M. Goldman. Midlothian.

Accurate Sex-Ed Is a Must

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

Eighty-two percent of all parents want their teens to receive medically accurate, comprehensive sexuality education that includes information on abstinence, contraception, and disease prevention. A 2006 survey conducted by the Virginia Department of Education revealed that 14 percent of local school districts' Family Life Education programs are abstinence-only.

Recent evaluations of 11 abstinence-only programs showed they have no lasting, positive effect on people's sexual behavior. Instead, when teens do engage in sexual activity, they often engage in risky behavior because they were taught that contraception is ineffective. We as parents need to know our children are getting medically accurate and thorough sex education information that is available through the Family Life Education programs. This information could be potentially lifesaving and will help teens make responsible decisions regarding their health.

Please contact your delegates by telephone, e-mail, or hand-written note and ask them to support House Bill 1980, Parents' Right to Know. None of us wants our family to be faced with an unintended pregnancy or a sexually transmitted infection.

Edie Halstead. Glen Allen.

Blame Lies With Institutions, Not Families

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

In response to a reader who criticized my earlier "raging" letter about autism insurance: Though I might not have come across as such, I do side with the parents and children who have been so devastated by autism, and all the many neurological and immunological disorders facing U.S. families today. Perhaps this would have been more clear if my final paragraph had not been omitted:

"First, do no harm!" The health care industry executives and the politicians in their pockets are becoming extremely wealthy while American citizens are going bankrupt from medical expenses. It's time to turn this train around!

I know firsthand, albeit on a lesser scale, the turmoil, frustration, and challenges of a vaccine-damaged child. And I've read of the mind-boggling financial impossibilities and heartbreaking challenges faced by families affected by autism. My rage is really aimed at Big Pharma's products, doctors' philosophies, and the government's policies -- and the frustration that they are not held accountable for creating this financial quagmire.

Ruth J. Mills. Chesterfield.

Advertisement

 
View More: oakwood heights,editorial,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by drhoagie on February 12, 2009 at 9:35 pm

If the Democrat writer wrote truths and facts, he wouldn’t be a good Democrat.
Today’s Democrats cannot advance their policies and programs without lies and deceit.
Look at what we voted for in November and what we have in February.
Had Obama given us ANY insight of his agenda in an honest fashion, he’d be back community organizing in Chicago today.

Flag Comment Posted by skeet on February 12, 2009 at 1:45 pm

Jim Severt is a fraud. He is a liberal democrat activitist with an ax to grind and willing to lie or distort facts to prove his point,ie he is like most liberals.

Flag Comment Posted by Henry's Ghost on February 12, 2009 at 11:30 am

Posted by ( T Dubya ) on February 12, 2009 at 10:38 am

I don’t believe there is a Jim Severt.  Anyone that puts out that many LIES can not exist.

Oh there’s a Jim Severt alright. He was Virgil Goode’s former chief of staff before Goode left the Democratic party. He later became an advisor to Democrat Meredith Richards in her losing campaign against Goode. He is nothing more than a Democrat party hack that toes the party line and spouts off their talking points. Lies are par for the course.

Flag Comment Posted by T Dubya on February 12, 2009 at 10:38 am

I don’t believe there is a Jim Severt.  Anyone that puts out that many LIES can not exist.  Statistics tell us that the gun bought from a private seller at a gun show is the LEAST likely to be used in a crime.  No one had a sign at a gun show that says “no questions asked”.  The ATF would be all over them.  Shame on the RTD for printing this phony letter.

Flag Comment Posted by Henry's Ghost on February 12, 2009 at 9:52 am

Jim Severt’s facts are totally specious. The ATF report he cites (or rather fails to) DOES NOT claim that gun shows are the second leading source of guns used in crimes. That is a bald faced lie. The ATF report stated that gun shows are the second highest source of HIGH VOLUME trafficking cases and didn’t identify whether those high volume traffickers were licensed dealers or private citizens. The very idea that private citizens would be able to transfer large volumes of guns to the illegal market without drawing the attention of the ever-present police or ATF is ludicrous.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement