Letters to the Editor

» 3 Comments | Post a Comment

Proposed Closures Affect Mental Health

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

On behalf of the Virginia Council of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, I am writing to thank reporters Carlos Santos and Bill McKelway for shining a light on the impact of proposed closures of public psychiatric facilities on the children and families of Virginia.

While we support, in principle, the idea that psychiatric treatment is (like other medical treatment) ideally provided in an outpatient setting convenient to the patient's home, and that inpatient care should be reserved for the person whose treatment cannot safely be provided outside a hospital, specialized inpatient programs are sometimes necessary for the severely ill.

The children and adolescents treated at the Commonwealth Center for Children and Adolescents or Southwestern Virginia Mental Health Institute are seriously ill, or otherwise unable to be managed at private psychiatric hospitals (if any exist in their communities).

While we suspect that Gov. Tim Kaine, Commissioner James Reinhard, and Virginia Secretary of Health and Human Services Marilyn Tavenner are hoping that the crisis created by closing these beds will force communities to increase outpatient services -- I am not very optimistic. Recently, many physicians received letters from a local insurance company notifying us that they plan to cut Medicaid reimbursement rates to providers. Such a decrease will have a harsh impact on community mental health services.

The Virginia Council of AACAP has called on Kaine to reconsider the closure of this desperately needed safety net. In conjunction with other mental health provider groups we have asked our legislators to prevent closure of CCCA and the adolescent unit at SWVMHI. On behalf of our patients and their families, Virginia's child and adolescent psychiatrists respectfully request all Virginians to do the same.

Dorothy A. O'Keefe, M.D., President, Virginia Council, American Academy of

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

Richmond.

Obama Secretly Signed Abortion Funding

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

I watched as President Barack Obama took the oath of office to lead our country forward into an exciting, albeit challenging, future. Although he did not get my vote, I took heart at his many references to bipartisanship. He promised a transparent administration with eyes and ears open to both sides of the aisle.

Two days after the inauguration, I traveled to Washington to participate in the National March for Life. I was astounded at the hundreds of thousands of participants and gratified to see so many young Americans. I listened to several dozen speakers, including congressmen and women who promised to do their part to dialogue with our new president in support of this worthy cause.

It was with dismay and disappointment that I learned that Obama had overturned the global gag rule the next day by signing an executive order lifting restrictions on international organizations that accept funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development. In essence, this will allow millions of U.S. foreign-aid dollars to flow into international family planning programs that offer abortions or advocate for abortion rights. I was not surprised that he signed the order, but the manner in which he did it gives me pause.

Obama's first week was a busy one. He signed several executive orders, including ones on lobbying and national security. These were signed before cameras and invited guests, and all were invited to applaud them on the nightly news. However, when it came to attending to the global gag rule, he chose to do it in a low-key manner by signing it in private, releasing it late Friday, with no media coverage. Looks like that promise of transparency is becoming opaque mighty quickly.

Ann F. McCulla. Richmond.

Do Your Part: Start Composting

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

What do coffee grounds, banana peels, apple cores, egg shells, orange peels, tea bags, watermelon rinds, leaves, grass clippings, napkins, sticks, corn husks, etc. all have in common? Each one of these items is found in our backyard compost pile, naturally decomposing with help from rain, humidity, sunlight, and unseen organisms -- eventually for use as rich mulch in our garden!

Not only are we saving money and fossil fuels in terms of plastic garbage bags, transportation to the dump, and storage space in a landfill, we are facilitating a continuous feedback loop of positive consumption to fertilize our garden soil. Our local vegetables are ripe with economic and environmental benefits! Buying local Virginia-grown agriculture, and/or growing your own, greatly helps the local economy, keeping farmers on their land, and financial revenues circulating in the local economic infrastructure.

Composting is one way I address global warming. We can all contribute our share in decreasing our carbon footprints. Food waste in a landfill produces methane as it breaks down due to the lack of oxygen. Consequently, methane, a greenhouse gas several times more heat-trapping than CO2, is globally on the rise from industrial farming operations, landfill emissions, and other forms of inefficient waste disposal.

While composting is a little easier in a rural area, composting is certainly viable in towns and cities. It takes only a small corner to establish a place for decomposition. The more organic material added, from leaves to apple cores to coffee grounds, will only increase rates of decomposition into rich garden fertilizer. Establishing a community garden may be the kind of community-empowering service our nation has recently been called upon to lead by example, all across the United States. Cheers to service and efficiency!

Melissa Earley. Charlotte Court House.

Advertisement

 
View More: closures,budgets,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Randy on February 11, 2009 at 8:10 pm

Helmet:

The Office of the President: Yes.

Chairman Barry: No.

In the words of Kyle-Anne Shiver, Barack Obama is the perfect collision of Murphy’s Law and the Peter Principle.

What am I supposed to respect about Chairman Barry? His friends and the people who inform his sensibilities? That ain’t happening. Should I respect his hard-line, extreme far left policies that the CBO indicated, in the case of the spending bill, will result in consequences far worse than doing nothing at all?

I intend to offer Chairman Barry the same level of disrespect that he offered and continues to offer, the last president. He’s got no new, original ideas. He’s offered us up Clinton retreads and tax cheats - which, by definition, I suppose constitutes change. I will make one exception, I will not bad mouth Chairman Barry on foreign soil - a courtesy that Al Gore, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Chairman Barry himself, did not extend to the last president.

Obama sold his followers a bill of goods. I’m glad he didn’t fool me.

Flag Comment Posted by Helmet on February 11, 2009 at 6:04 pm

To Ann and Randy. I must admit that I laughed at your comments. One Pro-lifer, which I respect as your choice, and one that is just disrespectful to the President. My comments to you both are simple. To the Pro-lifer I’m sure you have heard of the woman with 6 children that recently increased the number by 8. I think she’s Pro-life. If you personally aren’t going to adopt a child, send the lady money in support. To Randy, I didn’t like Bush but I still respected him as being President. Wake up kid. America is made up of varying cultures and beliefs. We all have different needs and we all contribute to society in one way or another. Americans in general need to respect the Office of the President.

Flag Comment Posted by Randy on February 11, 2009 at 11:58 am

Of course Chairman Obama signed the abortion executive order with little fanfare. With Chairman Obama, we have a hard line leftist as president in both word and deed.

Chairman Obama’s messianic certitude that only government can fix things must have Stalin and Marx cheering from beyond the grave. Life is not sacred to Chairman Obama as his paper thin voting record indicated while he spent two whole years in the senate.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement