Letters To The Editor
County Supervisor Needs To Fix Sandston's Ills
Editor, Times-Dispatch: I have been a resident of Virginia my entire 15 years of living. I've played on the playgrounds of recreation centers, of Sandston Elementary School, and on the streets of Sandston. I've always known there was a problem with the community and something really should have been done before now -- so I'm doing something about it.
I attend Highland Springs High School. Jim Donati, the Varina representative on the Henrico Board of Supervisors, has not done anything for the Sandston community, only improving things that don't need to be improved. It disgusts me, honestly.
When I was in the first grade at Sandston Elementary, my class had to use the rundown gym before the new one was built -- after 75 years. For my middle school years, I attended Moody Middle in the West End. I was with the IB program. I experienced how the West End schools benefit way more. For example: Hermitage High School has an orchestra pit, a shiny podium, and so on. Highland Springs High School has a beat-up stage and seats that are raggedy.
Donati needs to start investing taxpayer money into something more important -- like schools and recreation. The Sandston Memorial Recreation Center needs help. Flyers were handed out after the First Annual Sandston Memorial Day Parade that described what is wrong with the recreation center. I have created a Facebook group: S.O.S. (Support Our Sandston). I listed all the things on the flyer that need to be done to improve the Sandston community. Supervisor Donati, listen to us. Sandston needs help. Put some money into East End schools and our recreation center. We won't stop until you do.
Cathy Quigg.
Sandston.
Virginia Welcomes McAuliffe's Arrival
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Regarding the editorial about Terry McAuliffe, "Recent History": To assert that the Republican-controlled House of Delegates is a bastion of bipartisanship is untrue, nonsensical, and, well, partisan.
Was the Republican-controlled House bipartisan in refusing the return of $125 million of our tax money to assist workers hammered by the Republican recession?
Was the House bipartisan in opposing legitimate policies for early voting so more Virginians could participate in this process?
Was it bipartisan of the House to block increased energy efficiency across Virginia, block tax exemptions for the use of solar, and tax credits for renewable energy?
Was it bipartisan of the House to block incentives for new companies that manufacture parts for renewable energy projects from locating their plants in Virginia?
Was it bipartisan of the House to slash over 50 percent of Gov. Tim Kaine's funding of Pre-K education?
All these, and others, easily passed the Senate, but the House refused.
The editors blew smoke about our smoke-free law. That law represents a huge scaling back, by the House, of the governor's plan. The speaker of the House, William Howell, was not moved by the 75 percent of the voters supporting the ban. Howell was rattled by the grassroots organizer working his district. The speaker caved out of pure self-interest.
The situation in the House is as bad as McAuliffe asserts.
The transportation mess was created by the House's unwillingness to face reality. Its tone-deaf "no taxes" mantra has put the commonwealth on the precipice of losing federal highway funds.
Your last shot contends that McAuliffe parachuted into Virginia politics. If he did, it was because he was in a hurry to address big issues and the roads were gridlocked.
Jamie Lindsay.
Spotsylvania.
Evolution Isn't Fact -- Don't Present as Such
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Regarding the news story, "Carolina Wrens and Humans: Distant Cousins": The idea of a common ancestry for the Carolina wren and humans is in no way scientific, and does not belong in a column on science. If the author had said, "according to the theory of evolution," I might not have written. However, evolution was presented as established fact. The evolutionary model has no proofs and is thus anti-scientific. There is no evidence of generation of life from non-life, nor of progression in complexity of organisms over time.
The belief in evolution of humans from simpler predecessors is based on a resistance to acknowledgment of the obvious truth: Our lives, characteristics, and personalities derive from the creator -- God. The apostle Paul wrote "what may be known about God is plain . . . from what has been made" and that to believe anything different is to "suppress the truth." People resist the idea of kinship with God because they fear unacceptability to God in their current state. Fortunately, God provided for escape from punishment for sin through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
The acceptance of evolution as fact is the source of hopelessness, meaningless, and the "quiet desperation" that Thoreau identified. The construct is a house of cards, thoroughly false, and its secondand third-order effects are destructive.
Ronald Ellyson.
Hampton.
We Don't Need Another Marketplace
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Considering the manifold problems facing the City of Richmond, spending money to study the feasibility of putting a ballpark in Shockoe Bottom makes as much sense as placing a priority on arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. The city doesn't need another Sixth Street Marketplace, and we don't need to destroy William Byrd's view so a few can get richer.
One need only look at Mary Wingfield Scott's two books to get a good picture of what Richmond might have been -- another Charleston, another Savannah.
It's time our elected leaders concentrated their efforts on saving what is left, instead of catering to the developers who make substantial contributions to those with the vote. A.R. Bowles III. Richmond.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
BY THE WAY, LOVE YOUR ARTICLE CATHY KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK OH AND CONGRATS ON GETTING IT IN ;)
If the religious faithful are right, the atheist is doomed to eternal damnation.
God or no God? Somebody’s eventually going to be disappointed. If the atheist is right, there’s nothing for everyone. If the religious faithful are right…...
Ah, Mr. CWB, you can never know the mind of God, only the words that He or other holy figures have spoken. You say we should use our brains to truly understand the universe and yes, I agree with you in this matter; however, when the human mind has been programmed by years and years of pure crap and un-godly things from the media (which is fueled by nothing but sex, money, and drugs by the way), you have no other alternative to understanding. An understanding, by the way that has been overly-exxagerated and glorified to seem logical. The simple fact of the matter is once again, God is the alpha and omega. This means that no matter what kind of “logic” or “understanding” humans come up with, His word is still ultimately the truth whether you choose to believe and accept it or not.
Once again, I am not arguing. I am simply stating my opinion.
Ok wow um where to start.
first of all…
““Evolution Isn’t Fact—Don’t Present as Such”
Yes, it is. The theory applies to the exact process, not to the result.“
The last time i checked the words theory and fact mean to completely seperate things. I’m not saying evolution doesn’t exist because there are certain strains of bacterium, viruses or what have you that can evolve to become more malignant or resistant to certain things; however, the idea that humans “evolved” from whatever is purely rediculous. The reason for this, as 12steprevenge so aptly put it, is indeed creationism. which brings me to you sir.
“Mr. Ellyson:
Creationism isn’t fact—don’t present it as such.“
Creationism is indeed a fact as it is written in the bible. now i know this is a contraversal matter, the bible and science, and though i am a science fanatic, i am also a very religous man. I have come to learn that the words of the bible are the ultimate truth and no matter what kind of logic you raise against it, there is just no way to prove it “wrong.“ Though i doubt this will change your mind or even raise a thought in your mind in the slightest, i just though i’d voice my opinion.
Mr. Ellyson got it completely backwards. “The belief in evolution of humans from simpler predecessors is based on a resistance to acknowledgment of the obvious truth” Actually, denial of evolution is based on a resistance to acknowledgment of the obvious truth, that evolution has been tested, observed, and verified by many different fields of science over many decades. Quoting a Bible passage does nothing to disprove volumes of good science. The only house of cards here is religion itself. If science unequivocally proves a claim in the Bible is false then all the other claims and beliefs that are based upon that belief come tumbling down, so the only out you have is to bury your head in the sand, quote bible passages, and play semantic games with the word ‘theory’. Yet everyday you take advantage of technologies that were used to add further proof to evolution. Mr. Ellyson provides no science, merely bumper sticker ready propaganda. It is possible to believe in God and still understand that evolution is a fact. I worship at the figurative alter of science. The universe is laid out before us, Gods creation, what better way to pay respect to that than to use our brains and try and understand how it works, then we can truly know the mind of god.
Perhaps it was not a case of being partisan.
Perhaps they were just right!!!
Jamie Lindsay’s letter is partisan.
The second part of that sentence is what got me: “There is no evidence… of progression in complexity of organisms over time”
How deep in denial do you have to be to ignore the evidence provided by the fossil record? It has a pretty clear progression of the complexity of organisms over geologic time (which represents far more than just the last 6,000 years or so, as contended by many anti-evolutionists). I actually had someone argue in a religion class that fossils were put here as a “test of faith” by god, to discern the “true believers”. I wonder what Mr. Ellyson’s theories on the fossil record are…
“There is no evidence of generation of life from non-life”
Which has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. You know you’re dealing with dolts when this line comes out.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement