VITA: Remember Why There’s an IT Infrastructure Partnership

» 4 Comments | Post a Comment

FAIRFAX The ground was soft and muddy, but the atmosphere was jovial. Gov. Tim Kaine and then-Attorney General Bob McDonnell were in attendance. Fried pies were being served and bluegrass music was playing under the big tent.

This was the scene of the 2006 groundbreaking for Northrop Grumman's new IT facility being built in the town of Lebanon. And this momentous occasion -- along with the hundreds of new jobs that came with it -- was a result of the IT Infrastructure Partnership between the company and the Virginia Information Technologies Agency (VITA).

Fast forward to today and there isn't much joy or spirit of partnership between the commonwealth's largest private employer and the state's embattled IT agency. The recent JLARC report only casts more light onto chronic communications, contractual, and technical problems that have plagued the deal probably from the start.

As someone who used to represent the company and helped it win the landmark $2 billion deal, I feel a certain sadness that this grand plan has gone terribly askew. Both VITA and the company have worked hard to make this thing work.

On the other hand, as a local elected official, serving on the Fairfax City Council, I'm frustrated with both Northrop Grumman and the state's IT agency for not getting their act together, and that it's costing taxpayers' precious dollars that aren't there. Local governments were supposed to benefit from the state's IT infrastructure, allowing us to purchase services at reduced prices. That isn't happening.

To fix the problems, though, we need to understand why we are here in the first place.

This deal wasn't about technology alone. In addition to fixing the state's ancient and vulnerable IT systems, it was about job creation, economic development, and introducing a new way of governing through a public-private partnership.

When then-Gov. Mark Warner announced the awarding of the 10-year, $2 billion contract in November 2005, state agency IT departments were already being put under one roof known as VITA. The next step of this transformation was to find a private partner to modernize the state's woefully inadequate computer systems. Highlights of the inept system included state employees using 12 separate e-mail services, some agencies using Windows Office 97, and millions of dollars' worth of illegal copies of software floating around.

The modernization concept (and how to pay for it) was this: Turn IT into a service similar to a utility, not much unlike the telephone or electricity. So instead of individual agencies buying their own computers and software, they instead would now buy "seats" that in turn got them not only the latest equipment, but also enhanced security and technical know-how.

In finding a partner, the state was looking for the company to make a significant investment in Virginia by building two new data centers (including VITA's new headquarters) in addition to paying for all of the computers, wires, software, and widgets needed to revitalize the state's IT infrastructure.

The General Assembly also insisted that the contract be equal to the same amount the state would have been paying for its IT services -- not a dime more. To make this happen while also satisfying the need to make a profit, Northrop Grumman would take the financial risk, but it would be allowed to leverage the state's IT network and sell services to local governments, higher education institutions, and the private sector.

The true genius of this was to find a partner that could help expand economic opportunity throughout the state. In other words, this wasn't just a contract -- it was a job creator. Not just the 400 Northrop Grumman jobs the company expects to ultimately create, but the ancillary employment and economic development opportunities that would result.

It worked: In Lebanon, for instance, CGI built its facility next to Northrop Grumman's IT facility, creating an additional 600 jobs in the rural part of the state. That's 1,000 new jobs in Russell County directly attributable to this project. The state also got the added benefit of having 600 VITA employees become Northrop Grumman employees, thus coming off the state's pension and health insurance plans and eventually saving taxpayers millions of dollars.

Clearly, there are difficulties facing this marriage. This deal has not lived up to expectations and both sides are to blame. But with a $400 million break-up fee hanging over its head, the commonwealth can't afford to walk away. Nor can Northrop Grumman, as its reputation and prestige are on the line.

With the upcoming legislative session certain to bring proposals to reform the contract and VITA itself, it's time to take a step back and see what's worked and what hasn't. And those working to salvage this deal need to remember that this partnership isn't about them. Rather, it's about the people who now have jobs in Russell County, the chance to save taxpayers money, and creating a partnership that will be a model for other states to follow while moving Virginia forward.



Daniel F. Drummond is a member of the Fairfax City Council. From 2004-08, Drummond worked as a communications consultant to Northrop Grumman in support of the IT Infrastructure Partnership. Contact him at .

Advertisement

 
View More: vita,northrop grumman,it infrastructure partnership,dan drummond,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by btreadwell on October 24, 2009 at 6:12 pm

What is disturbing is this rehashing of hopeful dreams from 2005. The reality is not ONE SINGLE NEW JOB has been created in Russel county. And of the 600 that came off the state payroll to go to NG? NET LOSS of jobs as many have been layed off.

Reminds me of a book about lies and the lying liars that lie them.

Drummond: Read this book! You are in it!

Flag Comment Posted by CharlesHague on October 23, 2009 at 5:31 pm

Thanks for your comments Demosthenes!  I agree with you 100%; Drummond’s assumptions, and many of his statements, are without merit!

Drummond’s statement “fixing the state’s ancient and vulnerable IT systems” is beyond infuriating!  Some smaller agencies may have been under funded and out of date, but the majority were not!  The agencies generally had excellent, innovative, IT personnel.  Drummond, I was there; you weren’t!

If Virginia’s technology was so bad, then some of the State’s previous awards should be returned.

The 2005 Government Performance Project graded Virginia “A-“ in the category that includes use of information and technology.  Virginia was one of only five states that received an A in this category.  Mark Warner widely bragged that Virginia was the only state to receive straight A’s in all categories making it the “best managed state.“  How could that be true if the technology used to support state government was so ancient and vulnerable?

Virginia received an “A-“ in the Information Technology category for the 1999 and 2001 performance reports.  Comments in the 2001 report were extremely complimentary of Virginia’s information technology and its use.  Moreover, Virginia was ranked third in the 2004 Digital States Survey that recognizes the effective use of information technologies to run government.

Perhaps some of Virginia’s 2005 IT providers such as IBM, Cisco, Unisys, Verizon, MCI, Sun, Microsoft, et al won’t take kindly to Drummond’s comments either.

And watch out fellow citizens of the Commonwealth!  Mr. Drummond states that this deal was about “introducing a new way of governing through a public-private partnership.“  How soon will the sign that says “State Capitol” be replaced with one that says “Northrop Grumman?“  In many ways, it seems that’s already been done!

Flag Comment Posted by Demosthenes on October 23, 2009 at 7:55 am

RE: “True Genius of the Partnership”

The true genius of the partnership is not in making short term gain for long term detriment. That is like borrowing $5000 at 20% interest to go to Disneyland. And that is exactly what is happening here.

The one true benefit of this public-private partnership is not to save money, but to guarantee that IT will be funded consistently no matter how the winds of political change blow.

Unfortunately it costs more to impose this multi fiscal year discipline via contract.

And unfortunately it removes the ability of agencies to make decisions about their required levels of IT infrastructure.

Flag Comment Posted by Demosthenes on October 23, 2009 at 7:41 am

RE: “The next step of this transformation was to find a private partner to modernize the state’s woefully inadequate computer systems.“

It was stated at the outset that the “bids” were unsolicited.

In addition we keep hearing politicians using terms like “woefully inadequate” to characterize agency IT infrastructure. This is never challenged, and with all due respect it is a false assumption, without supporting evidence. Many DIT centralized mainframe systems were upgraded along with agency specific infrastructure prior to either VITA or NG. DMV, DMME, VDOT and many more agencies won awards for their IT systems including Internet access to their services for the Commonwealth.

Thus if the basic assumption is without merit, what was the true reason for the “partnership”? Getting rid of knowledgeable IT folks for the sake of saving money on salary and benefits as you point out in your editorial?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement