People Must Find Moral Compases

» 8 Comments | Post a Comment

DON GEHRING We find ourselves in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. It is the economic equivalent of 9/11. Most assuredly, there is plenty of blame to be shared by both government, for its failure to provide adequate oversight, and the private sector, for its catastrophic bad judgment and greed.

While that much is clear, solutions to the crisis we find ourselves in are much less clear. Reasonable minds differ on the Obama administration's stimulus package. The economic "experts" are all over the lot in terms of their "solutions." For the average American the complexities of our economic system are befuddling and arcane. In fact, most of us are still reeling from the reality of what we have lost over the past several months. We are afraid to open our financial statements because we have come to expect only bad news.

How do we move forward from here? Obviously we have to jump-start the economy, get credit flowing again, and restore a sense of trust in the economic system. That is, of course, easier said than done. No one, despite protestations to the contrary, has a tested roadmap out of this very complicated economic quagmire. But before we leave the solutions to the politicians and economists, let's focus for a minute on what got us into this mess and what commonsense changes can help get us out of it and keep us out of it.

WHAT GOT us here is unbridled greed, credit decisions and practices not grounded in prudent and time-honored business principles, and a disregard for stockholder and employee well-being. In short, the moral compass was lost -- or perhaps more accurately, thrown away. Unless we effect a fundamental change in corporate culture and values, no stimulus package will have lasting positive impact.

No meaningful change can begin until accountability is restored. Accountabiity has to be fully embraced by the corporate community. And how is that accomplished? First and foremost, boards of directors have to do more than collect a check and stock options. It is their responsibility to make sure an incentive system is in place that rewards honesty, ethical conduct, and profitability equally. Profits cannot be earned at the expense of unethical or borderline illegal practices.

Boards have to hire executives who share these values and who will hold their own executive teams to the same standards. And they have to make it clear that they will not tolerate or reward leaders who do not meet these standards. This is the kind of change in corporate mentality and culture that will lead not only to long-term financial stability and growth, but also to a rebirth of public confidence, which is sorely needed.

There is also a critical role for our colleges and universities to play. At a minimum, every institution of higher learning should have an ethics graduation requirement for undergraduates, graduate students, and first professionals, i.e., medical and dental students. The more students are exposed to ethics training, the more likely it is that their decision-making will be properly grounded.

WHILE WE can hope that government officials and agencies will approach their regulatory and oversight functions with renewed vigor, it is quite often true that government rules measure the extent of transgression more than actually prevent prohibited conduct. Taken seriously, a change in corporate values and reward systems can have a dramatic positive effect on this country's economic vitality.

At the end of the day, maybe at least part of the solution to our current financial crisis is much less complicated than it appears. It's time to find the moral compass and use it. --- Don Gehring is VCU's vice president for government relations and health policy. He can be reached at .

Advertisement

 
View More: rk90,pga07,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on June 24, 2009 at 8:57 am

DougVA2811: You’re right about the other side of the coin. The moral rot in this country goes deep and we are getting the kind of government we deserve. It speaks volumes that people in a despotism like Iran will march in the 100,000s for freedom and liberty while people here will only march for the next handout.

Flag Comment Posted by Question Govt on June 23, 2009 at 3:38 pm

A significant and shameful impediment is that we have raised a generation “educated” to believe that self-interest and “getting ahead at any price” are more important than personal responsibility, ethical conduct and moral values. As a result, unfortunately there are are great number who have no moral compass to find.

Flag Comment Posted by DougVA2811 on June 23, 2009 at 11:15 am

Guido, the government created the petri dish that nurtured corporate greed.  If there were no subprime debt, it couldn’t be bundled into CDO.  If there were no CDO, there would be no market for CDS.  In that case, the financial instruments would have been good investments, not a grenade waiting to go off.  In reality, everyone was to blame from the government all the way down to the consumers.  But I still lay the bulk of the blame on the government.  That is not being dishonest.  That is a conclusion based on what I’ve seen.

Flag Comment Posted by GuidoMcGinty on June 23, 2009 at 10:12 am

Doug, how is it possible to conclude that corporate greed had nothing to do with the economic implosion?  You can argue about the magnitude but it takes a galling amount of dishonesty to conclude it was all at the hands of the government.

Flag Comment Posted by DougVA2811 on June 23, 2009 at 9:54 am

Great letter; sloppy editing; nonsensical content.  Gee whiz!  I am so tired of hearing how corporate greed was behind the economic implosion.  It was not corporate greed.  It was government meddling.  If not for government pushing it, the financial institutions would never have extended subprime credit.  And then the government did not oversee the frankenstein it created.  Anyone who says that anything other than government drove the crisis, simply is denying reality.  The road to 7734 is paved with good intentions.

Flag Comment Posted by jerry78linda on June 23, 2009 at 9:48 am

That’s right Dave we’re talking about the “government”.  Only one President in our history paid off the national debt before leaving office and that was Andrew Jackson (Democratic-Republican turned Democrat).

So the spending started with the first George and doesn’t appear to have stopped except during Andrew’s tenure.  However, after he left office there was a severe Depression and the debt increased tenfold within a year.  That’s right this country has had more than one depression, the first was between 1837 to 1844.

What we are seeing now and from the past several years is nothing new.  But this economic mess is not “all government”, it is “street” as well, just as this editorial says.  Greed comes in all shapes and sizes.

Flag Comment Posted by 12steprevenge on June 23, 2009 at 9:14 am

I hate to do this, but what are you guys paying an editor for when your lead editorial has a misspelling in the headline? Great letter, sloppy editing.

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on June 23, 2009 at 9:07 am

The ‘complexities’ of the economy are manufactured by a political elite in order for them to gain and maintain control over peoples’ lives. I get paid for my services. I pay my bills. I do not accrue debt unless I know I can repay it - without taking out another loan to do so. I balance my budget. I establish a credit rating so people know they can trust me. What’s so ‘complex’ about honesty, integrity and trustworthiness? Oh, I’m sorry. We’re talking the government. Never mind.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement