Scientists study drilling off Virginia coast
Published: December 4, 2008
Scientists are beginning to assess what they know -- and what they don't -- about the environmental consequences of drilling for gas and oil in a triangular section of the Atlantic Ocean off Virginia's coast.
What they learn could open more Southern coastal waters to drilling.
The government began a two-day workshop yesterday for researchers and scientists to discuss drilling's impact on sea life and commercial and recreational fishing, along with other environmental and economic issues. The proposed drilling would occur 50 miles from shore in an area believed to contain 130 million barrels of oil and 1.14 trillion cubic feet of gas.
"We have some of the top scientists from the East Coast here to inform us on the environmental information that's available as well as data gaps," said Jim Cimato of the Minerals Management Service, a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Interior.
Many of the scientists said climate change is just one factor that has altered some research that dates back decades. Science on some species is also either lacking or incomplete.
Scott Krauss of the New England Aquarium in Boston offered detailed research on the impact of ship traffic on whales and sea turtles and the "rising tide of noises" in the acoustic spaces of dolphins and whales.
The Bush administration has pushed forward with the leasing of waters off Virginia's coast, and President-elect Barack Obama has said he would support a limited expansion of offshore oil and natural-gas development.
House Democratic leaders have backed that position, stating last month that they would not seek to reinstate a quarter-century ban on drilling in 85 percent of the nation's offshore federal waters.
Currently, virtually all Outer Continental Shelf drilling occurs in the Gulf of Mexico.
Cimato said any leasing wouldn't occur until late 2011 or 2012.
The offshore waters identified for possible drilling cover 2.9 million acres over a pie-slice-shaped region that is 50 miles wide nearest the Virginia shore. The area discussed by scientists yesterday generally included a wider swath of the mid-Atlantic shore.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Having watched oil prices slide $100/barrel since July is a powerful testament to what small changes in the balance of demand versus supply can do.
Add to this the inherent safety advantage of transporting oil and gas by pipeline versus tanker and the current account advantage of using domestic versus imported fuels it should be a no brainer that developing domestic oil and gas reserves is best both environmentally and economically for the nation.
I would even be willing to pay more for domestic oil and gas and towards that end the US should impose a tax on imported oil and gas to maintain a domestic price sufficient to make offshore development profitable. We can’t have a energy policy worthy of the name with such wild swings in oil and gas prices. Some stability is necessary and only a tax on imported fuel can achieve this.


Advertisement