Law-enforcement agencies share intelligence in new center

Law-enforcement agencies share intelligence in new center

2008, EVA RUSSO/TIMES-DISPATCH

“The exchange of information is better, there’s no question about it,“ said state police Superintendent W. Steven Flaherty.

» 7 Comments | Post a Comment

The call came from an intelligence fusion center in Illinois to Virginia's fusion center in Chesterfield County.

Police at the University of Illinois had identified a Virginia resident who had been cyber-stalking two students and threatening to carry out a campus massacre similar to what occurred in 2007 at Virginia Tech. The suspect said by e-mail that he was on his way to the university on Jan. 12, 2008.

The Virginia Fusion Center, housed in Virginia State Police headquarters on Midlothian Turnpike, used the information to find out what kind of car the suspect was driving and to determine that he had no record of firearms purchases in the state. They soon found him through local law enforcement in Southwest Virginia, where he was being held on a mental-health warrant, Virginia State Police said.

The situation might not have been terrorism-related, but information about it was shared by the intelligence network assembled after the Sept. 11 attacks. The network has made sharing of critical information the rule, not the exception, in criminal investigations and emergencies.

"We created a fusion center to share, to make it impossible not to share," said Capt. Steven W. Lambert, commander of the state police's Criminal Intelligence Division, which runs the center.

The result is a working relationship among federal, state and local law-enforcement agencies -- as well as fusion centers across the country -- that local emergency officials say they have never seen before.

"We've got situational access that we didn't have before," said Curt M. Nellis, deputy emergency management coordinator in Chesterfield. "That makes our job a lot easier when we're aware of what the threat is we have to handle."

The Virginia center opened in December 2005, although it was already in operation as a "virtual" information-sharing network through law-enforcement and other agencies. It's not virtual anymore. The center physically houses representatives of the FBI and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, as well as state police, the Virginia Department of Emergency Management, the Virginia National Guard and the state Department of Fire Programs. Personnel also work closely with private institutions, such as Dominion Virginia Power, that own sensitive systems critical to public safety.

The center has struggled with funding, as federal homeland-security grants have dwindled and 80 percent of available money has been reserved for localities. But the operation, with 28 full-time state positions, has delivered on the promises made to improve intelligence-sharing after terrorists struck the Pentagon in Arlington County and the World Trade Center in New York eight years ago. State police also have representatives on every joint terrorism task force in the state and included an intelligence officer in every field office in the state.

"The exchange of information is better, there's no question about it," said state police Superintendent W. Steven Flaherty.

One reason is the creation of the Department of Homeland Security in 2003, said retired Maj. Gen. Bruce M. Lawlor, who helped create the agency while at the White House under President George W. Bush.

"If you look at the information environment on September 11th and the information environment today, it's night and day," said Lawlor, now director of Virginia Tech's Center for Technology, Security and Policy. "The department is largely responsible for that."

The information the center handles isn't always about potential terrorist threats. Sometimes, the center is used for tips on illegal drugs and other criminal operations. Last year, for example, the center played a role in intercepting a shipment of illegal drugs from Texas to Northern Virginia, as well as finding a suspect and victim in a child-pornography case.

And the system also works among the states. This year, for example, the center was alerted by the Florida attorney general's office that a threat had been made against NFL quarterback Michael Vick, who was released from prison after serving 18 months for running a dogfighting ring in Surry County. The woman who made the threat had moved from eastern Virginia to Texas, where law-enforcement officials tracked her down. It didn't take long to determine that the threat wasn't credible.

"She was scared to death," Lambert said. "She was a huge Dallas [Cowboys] fan. . . . She didn't think she would get in trouble saying that."

Meanwhile, the fusion center played a role this month in distributing a warning by the FBI that terrorists might be plotting to attack stadiums, hotels, and entertainment complexes. The bulletins didn't cite specific threats but came during an investigation of possible bomb plots in New York and Denver.

Lambert confirmed that the center also had received information that the Marine Corps base at Quantico had been among the potential targets of an alleged terrorist ring in North Carolina.

"There are a number of plots that have been uncovered as possible risks," Lambert said Friday. "We are grateful we were able to get ahead of them. They were very serious threats."



Contact Michael Martz at (804) 649-6964 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: virginia state police,virginia fusion center,terrorism,law enforcement,editors picks,chesterfield county,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on September 29, 2009 at 9:51 am

§ 54.1-4201. Inspection of records.

A. Every dealer in firearms shall keep at his place of business, for not less than a period of two years, the original consent form required to be completed by § 18.2-308.2:2 for each firearm sale.

Those records are kept (on paper) by the individual, private dealers. They aren’t part of a government database. They are there to be used for specific investigations like tracing a gun that police already know has been used in a crime, and they can’t be (and aren’t) searched en masse.

BIG difference from this computer database.

Flag Comment Posted by Hot Stuff on September 29, 2009 at 9:38 am

§ 54.1-4201. Inspection of records.

A. Every dealer in firearms shall keep at his place of business, for not less than a period of two years, the original consent form required to be completed by § 18.2-308.2:2 for each firearm sale.


Dammed if you do—dammed if you don’t!  Everyone wants the government to protect them from another VA Tech incident or another September 11th, but then whines!  Law enforcement can’t win!

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on September 29, 2009 at 9:22 am

It’s disturbing because it violates both state and federal laws against retaining information received for purposes of conducting a background check.

They are illegally compiling and creating a gun/gun owner registry with data that the law says they are only permitted to receive and use to do an instant background check to determine eligibility to buy, and may only keep for a limited period. See Va Code 18.2-308.2:2(B)(3).

It’s illegal and Orwellian. The government does not need to know and should not know who has guns, what kinds, how many, etc. on demand. It gives them too much power and too much ability to come knocking on the door for ridiculous reasons, or to illegally confiscate them.

Flag Comment Posted by squier13 on September 29, 2009 at 8:41 am

Socialism at its best

Flag Comment Posted by Reverend on September 29, 2009 at 8:38 am

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.

If they can determine what you own, where you are, and other assorted information, in the WRONG hands that becomes an ABUSE of power…

Flag Comment Posted by justagirlintheworld on September 29, 2009 at 8:30 am

Dave, why is that disturbing? I think it is great!

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on September 29, 2009 at 8:16 am

A little disturbing that they could check to see whether he’d bought a gun. I thought they weren’t supposed to retain records on those transactions for more than a short period…

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement