Riverkeeper’s job: Helping solve problems on the James

Riverkeeper’s job: Helping solve problems on the James

P. KEVIN MORLEY/TIMES-DISPATCH

David Sligh, the Upper James Riverkeeper with the James River Association, sets out in his kayak at the Bremo Bluff landing in Buckingham County.

 
» 9 Comments | Post a Comment

SLIDESHOW: Riverkeeper
BLOG: James River Journal

NEW CANTON-- The James River ran gray and icy, not a great place for paddling. But David Sligh was about to shove off to work.

Sligh, 48, is the new riverkeeper for the upper James. A combination investigator, scientist and river advocate, Sligh looks for problems in the James and tries to solve them.

From a boat landing here about 55 miles west of Richmond, Sligh planned to check out a report of tree-cutting upriver -- probably legal, but still a potential source of erosion. And he wanted to get reacquainted with this part of the James between Buckingham and Fluvanna counties.

"It's never a bad idea to look at a stretch you haven't seen in a while," Sligh said.

Before the chilly morning in early February was out, Sligh would get a sense of the river, all right -- and suffer a mishap that, had he not been prepared, could have killed him.

. . .

The bearded, bespectacled Sligh carried his 14-foot kayak to the water's edge. The tree-lined river, about 150 yards wide, looked wild and pretty in a drab, wintry way.

Wearing the pants of a body-warming dry suit, Sligh waded out to turn over some rocks. He was looking for river-dwelling insects. The bugs -- some of which need clean water, some of which tolerate pollution -- can provide a quick gauge of a river's health.

But Sligh couldn't find any rocks small enough to turn over. "They're here," he said. "They're just covered up" in mud.

That itself was a worry. There are lots of pollutants with lots of imposing scientific names, but a major problem in the James is old-fashioned dirt. It flows into the river from construction projects and banks trampled by cattle, among other sources.

Dirt can smother the bugs that feed fish. That can mean fewer fish, and a less-healthy river.

The dirt is part of a larger issue called runoff pollution. It includes manure, fertilizer and other contaminants that rains wash off farms, parking lots and yards.

This runoff -- not chemicals from factory pipes -- is the James' biggest problem. Sligh hopes he can make a difference, for example, by helping farmers find money for fences to keep their cattle out of streams.

As Sligh mucked about, the air temperature was in the mid-20s, the water about 40. The work fascinated Melissa Butler and Heather Ryder of Bremo Bluff, who had dropped by for a river visit.

"I'm cold, and I'm not even in the water," said Butler, 21.

Butler was unfamiliar with the keeper but interested in the river. She swims in the James in summer, and her two young children play along it.

"I don't want them to get sick," she said.

. . .

Sligh is an employee of the James River Association, a Richmond-based environmental group. He became a riverkeeper in June. He declined to reveal his salary but said it's between $40,000 and $50,000 a year.

His territory is huge, covering 242 miles of the upper James -- from its source west of the Blue Ridge Mountains to the Mayo Bridge in Richmond -- and thousands of miles of tributaries.

Co-worker Chuck Frederickson is riverkeeper for the tidal lower James.

There are nearly 200 riverkeepers -- as well as baykeepers, soundkeepers and lakekeepers -- on six continents. The programs are sanctioned by the Waterkeeper Alliance, an environmental group based in Irvington, N.Y.

There are three other waterkeepers in Virginia, one each for the Shenandoah River and the Eastern Shore and another for the Blackwater and Nottoway rivers.

One of the biggest challenges facing Sligh is a mysterious case of sick fish. Each spring since 2004, an unknown ailment has afflicted and killed smallmouth bass and sunfish, mainly in the Shenandoah, but also in the upper James.

"Starting in March I'll be out there a lot, looking for dead fish, looking for sources [of pollution], talking to everyone I can," Sligh said.

. . .

Sligh is a native of Botetourt County, north of Roanoke, where he played in streams, became an Eagle Scout and developed a love of the outdoors.

He holds a bachelor's degree in environmental science from the University of Virginia and a law degree from Vermont Law School. He is married and lives in Charlottesville.

Sligh made news in the mid-1990s when he worked in the Roanoke office of the state Department of Environmental Quality.

He felt that higher-ups were pressuring front-line DEQ employees to issue pollution permits that weren't tough enough on industries. At first Sligh objected within the agency. In February 1995 he quit his job and spoke out publicly.

In December 1996 the General Assembly's investigative agency issued a stinging report, saying the DEQ coddled polluters and was poorly managed.

Officials in the administration of then-Gov. George Allen called those findings inaccurate and politically inspired. Sligh took them as vindication. He says conditions for DEQ workers have improved since those days.

Robert G. Burnley was a high-ranking DEQ manager when Sligh went public. In an interview, Burnley recalled that Sligh made highly technical arguments, and Burnley said he isn't certain Sligh was correct. But he said Sligh was right to speak up.

"I think the world of David," Burnley said. "I appreciate the things he did" in airing those concerns.

Between leaving the DEQ and becoming riverkeeper, Sligh went to law school and worked for conservation groups in other states.

. . .

At the landing, Sligh mounted his kayak -- the type you sit on, not in -- and set off. He said he could be gone a few hours and made his good-byes.

Minutes later, however, he hit a hidden log and fell off the boat. Drifting downriver with the stiff current, Sligh hung on to the kayak with one arm and tried to back-stroke to shore with the other.

Forty-degree water can kill a man in street clothes within minutes. Motorists along the nearby U.S. 15 bridge saw Sligh struggling and called authorities.

After perhaps 15 minutes in the James, Sligh grabbed a fallen tree and made his way to the bank. He still had his boat but had lost his paddle. By then a small crowd of rescue-squad workers and onlookers had gathered.

Protected by his life jacket and dry-suit pants, Sligh was tired and cold but OK. "Sometimes it doesn't work out as planned," he said.

Then again, lots of people got to meet the new riverkeeper.



Contact Rex Springston at (804) 649-6453 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: slideshow,outdoors,james river journal,environment,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by greta on February 20, 2009 at 1:06 pm

“Annual” fish kills occur in rivers all over the country every year.
The scientists have no idea what causes them.
First they have to identify a cause and then perhaps they can devise a treatment.
The one on the James in 2007 is being actively investigat I have read stress the problems in the James lie mostly with runoff from large farms, pig and poultry. Large housing developments with too much concrete and vegetation clearage.
Contrary to your claims the industrial chemical problems are usually controlled by the treatment plants.
Dr. Singh excluded, because his credentials are impeccable, more problems are caused by busy bodies who
intefere with the experts work.Citizens who do not know the difference between ppm and ppb and think that all greenhouse gases are toxic cause more harm than good.
The James has its problems no doubt but it is well tended by all concerned and left to the professionals it will
be just fine.

Flag Comment Posted by stash on February 19, 2009 at 3:55 pm

How can anyone say that the James is not sick? Annual fish kills ain’t caused by dirt. They are caused by the toxic conditions that, by the evidence, is not adequately treated by the water treatment facilities operated on the James.
If we are going to get real about improving our natural resources, it will take dedicated people like Mr. Sligh to insure we are dealing with the right questions so we can find the right answers. It will also take a realistic view of what we are doing to the water we use and its treatment thereafter.

One published study states the possible cause of the fish kills is the plethora of pharmaceuticals emanating from agricultural operations and wastewater treatment plants. To say that wastewater treatment plants are doing a great job removing all toxins is just not correct. Many wwtps do a good job at what they are designed for, but none are designed to remove complex pharmaceutical molecules.The witches brew coming out the pipe is bound to have some effect on aquatic life.

The James needs help. And if Mr. Sligh needs some paddling lessons, I’ll help him out. The difference is that Mr. Sligh can ask for help. The James, by its condition, can only beg for it.

Flag Comment Posted by greta on February 18, 2009 at 11:19 am

I am not surprised to see no mention of the HWRFT in the letter defending Mr. Sligh.
It is quite true that the major problem in the James is not chemicals but dirt.
That is because the chemical waste water treatment plants have done such a good job of removing the toxic substances from the river.
The James like all the rivers in VA. has its trouble spots but it is not “sick.“
I am sure that we are all beholden to Mr. Sligh for the work he does.
But his work is only one part of the equasion.
He has excellent credentials in the environmental field.
But the way his job was portrayed in the article did not inspire confidence.

Flag Comment Posted by stash on February 18, 2009 at 7:25 am

I, for one, want to thank Mr. Sligh for all he does for the James River. I grew up on this river and saw generations Virginians damage and destroy this valuable river. The James is sick. It needs help. This guy has taken a job that pays a whole lot less than most lawyers, to provide an advocate’s voice for this historic jewell, the James. If people could focus on the need for improvement instead of his meager salary, his inability to read the river, or the safety factors regarding paddling alone, maybe the river would have a chance. But when people only focus on their own relationship to the story, they miss the point and our world suffers. To the readers who comment on the salary, the safety or the fact they know something better than the character in the story, get a bigger perspective.

Thanks Mr. Sligh. We need more people like you.

Flag Comment Posted by greta on February 16, 2009 at 3:04 pm

I am sure that Mr. Sligh’s job is a lot more complex than checking under rocks for river healthy bugs.
I certainly hope so for the rather “healthy salary he enjoys.
No mention was made of course to the dedicated professionals that work every day in treatment plants all up and down the James.
And none better than those that operate the Hopewell Regional Treatment Facility, in Hopewell.
On a daily basis the plant treats highly complex chemical waste and has gone about its work quietly and mostly unrecognized for decades.
I am also quite sure that many of the men in the trenches would love to make $50,000 a year kayaking up and down the river checking for bugs under rocks.
So while we are handing out plaudits. Here’s to the folks at the HRWFT for a job well done. Recognition and applause is long overdue!

Flag Comment Posted by Jer1234 on February 16, 2009 at 9:45 am

Why does somebody pay a person $40,000 to $50,000 a year to violate the main principle of river safety. NEVER BOAT ALONE.  How long would it have taken someone to find him if he had capsized his boat?  Even in 40 degree water wearing a lower section of dry suit he wouldn’t have lasted very long out there.  Who are these idiots that put their life and safety in natures hands?  Then we the taxpayers have to pay for the search to find him when something happens which it will.  Come on people use some common sense here.  Save the river but lose lives.

Flag Comment Posted by qhgirl on February 16, 2009 at 9:27 am

Wow, wonder what we taxpayers are paying for this “riverkeeper.“  Sounds like he doesn’t really have any business out there on a kayak.  Learning to read the water for hidden hazards is one of the first things I learned while canoeing.

Flag Comment Posted by JeepBrah on February 16, 2009 at 9:10 am

Kayakers and Canoists, when they are paddlling on water this time of year, nead to where all pieces of safety gear including helmuts, strap ons, and DVDAs.

Flag Comment Posted by PoppyJoe on February 16, 2009 at 7:21 am

I’m glad Mr. Sligh survived his adventure on the river.

However, I think your reporting gave short shrift to the brave men and women of the fire and rescue agencies in Buckingham and surrounding counties, who were alerted and turned out to attempt to correct Mr. Sligh’s misadventure. They did far more than “gather to watch.“

People die on that river, and often these men and women make the difference between life and death for those who are foolhardy enough to take chances there.

I hope that Mr. Sligh or his sponsors will take time to formally thank those involved, and offer to fully reimburse the fire and rescue agencies for their time and expense! I’m sure the Sheriff’s office or the Rescue Squad could provide a list of all the units and personnel who were called out for this event.

It is the least that could be done to show appreciation for the selfless dedication of these brave people.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement