American shad aren’t coming back in Va.

American shad aren’t coming back in Va.

P. KEVIN MORLEY/TIMES-DISPATCH

Will McCahill (front) and Chip Augustine boat along hte James River in downtown Richmond. The Department of Game and Inland Fisheries employees use special equipment for “electrofishing.“

» 6 Comments | Post a Comment

JAMES RIVER JOURNAL

SLIDESHOW: Shad research

American shad: Life History
The American shad is the largest, and considered the most tasty, of four related fish that live in the ocean most of the year and spawn in freshwater rivers in spring.
Shad spawn in rivers from Canada to Florida.
Migration is stressful, and about half of the fish die after spawning.
CATCHING AND EATING
Early Americans liked to "plank" shad by nailing them to boards and smoking them over open fires. The salted fish could be kept for months.
The Shad Planking in Sussex County remains an annual mid-April ritual.
The fish for this year's Shad Planking came from North Carolina.
The shad's species name, sapidissima, means "most delicious." The fish are bony, however.
The eggs, or roe, of shad long have been considered a delicacy. They can be steamed or sautéed with bacon and lemon.
OTHER TIDBITS
Writer and scientist Rachel Carson called the shad the "piscatorial representative" of the Chesapeake Bay states.
American shad make their spawning run about the same time the shadbush, or serviceberry, blooms with white flowers.
A shad can exceed 2 feet, but 12 to 20 inches is more common.
Today, many Virginians neither have seen nor tasted shad; exceptions include an ardent band of catch-and-release anglers in Richmond.

SOURCES: Chesapeake Bay Program, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Times-Dispatch research.
ON THE WEB
Bosher Dam shad cam: http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/fishing/shadcam
Virginia fish-passage program: http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/fishing/fish-passage
Shad restoration: http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/fishing/shad-restoration
Check for two: $52 (including three appetizers, one entrée, dessert and tax)

Something bright flashed near the surface of the murky James River. Will McCahill swung at it with a net and caught a piece of living history.

"Gentlemen, this is what it's all about," said boating partner Chip Augustine, eyeing a handsome 18-inch fish with silvery, iridescent scales.

The prize was an American shad -- probably the most important fish you've never seen. The shad, which migrates from the sea to freshwater rivers in the spring to spawn, once fed hungry Indians and settlers at winter's end. It supported a huge Virginia fishing industry.

Thomas Jefferson caught shad. Legend has it that migrating shad saved George Washington's troops from starvation at Valley Forge.

"This country was founded on American shad," said Augustine, with a nod toward a 2002 book by outdoor writer John McPhee, "The Founding Fish."

How did Americans express their thanks to shad? We built dams that blocked them from spawning territory, polluted their waters, and caught way too many to obtain their roe and tasty-but-bony flesh.

The shad responded by nearly dying out.

McCahill and Augustine, employees of the state Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, were catching shad near the Mayo Bridge in Richmond early this month to check on their numbers.

The men are part of a $200,000-plus yearly effort to bring back the shad. But for reasons that mystify scientists, the shad aren't coming back.

. . .

Commercial shad landings in Virginia dropped from 11.5 million pounds in 1897 to 550,000 pounds in 1993. The catch in the James, which topped 1 million pounds as recently as 1973, plummeted to 3,100 pounds in 1993.

The state made it illegal in 1994 to keep shad, ending centuries of shad fishing. Fishing off the coasts of Eastern states was banned in 2005.

"At one point, the American shad was the most important commercial finfish in the whole Chesapeake Bay," said Albert Spells, Virginia fisheries coordinator for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Those numbers have collapsed."

Shad also were important ecologically, providing meals for striped bass and other fish.

In the 1980s, Virginia decided to bring back the shad, and a major portion of that effort centered on the James. Workers blew or cut holes in three Richmond dams from 1989 to 1993.

In 1992, biologists began stocking millions of hatchery-raised baby shad upriver from the Bosher Dam just west of the Willey Bridge.

State officials estimated in 1993 that restoring shad in the river would pump about $5 million a year into Virginia's economy, from the sales of fishing gear and other goods.

The final barrier facing migrating shad, the 10-foot-tall Bosher Dam, was breached in 1999 with the opening of a $1.5 million tunnel-like fish passage.

Opening the passage meant the shad could, for the first time since the dam was built in 1823, reclaim hundreds of miles of upstream spawning territory.

Hopes ran high. One state official said the passage marked "the final chapter of a success story."

Results were promising at first. Nearly 800 shad swam through the passage in 2002. Experts figured thousands would move through by 2008.

Then, as Virginia Commonwealth University fish ecologist Greg Garman said, "the bottom dropped out."

Fewer than 200 fish made it through the passage in 2003. About 50 made it last year.

The falling numbers indicate the James' shad population has dropped even more, despite all the work to help the fish.

Each spring, the Virginia Institute of Marine Science monitors a sampling of shad caught in the James near Newport News. The program shows a decline since the monitoring began in 1998, and "2008 was the lowest year we've ever seen," VIMS marine scientist Brian Watkins said.

Experts reported similar declines at other East Coast rivers. The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, a regional regulatory agency, declared in 2007 that shad stocks were at all-time lows.

Scientists only can guess at the reason. Perhaps shad are getting caught accidentally at sea in nets set for other fish. Maybe global warming is causing the temperature-sensitive fish to get lost in migration.

Perhaps some predator, like blue catfish stocked in the James in the 1970s, is gobbling shad. Or maybe it's a combination of factors.

Adding to the mystery is the strange case of the hickory shad, the American shad's smaller cousin. So depleted in the early 1990s that some thought it would go extinct in the bay region, the hickory shad has rebounded so well that it draws thousands of anglers each spring to downtown Richmond.

"With no help from any management agency, no help from any biologist or any fish ladder or any of that, the hickory shad has come back like gangbusters," Garman said.

"That's frustrating, because we can't explain why" and can't duplicate the formula to help the American shad.

. . .

Shad in the James spawn roughly from Hopewell to Richmond. Though some have moved through the Bosher passage, there is no evidence the fish have continued any distance into all that now-open spawning territory.

VCU researchers this spring are following 100 shad fitted with electronic transmitters the size of small toothpaste caps.

"We would like to see some fish that come to the base of the dam keep going, but so far we haven't seen that," said Aaron Aunins, a graduate student helping conduct the study.

It's possible that shad stocked in the James -- the offspring of Pamunkey River shad -- are not genetically programmed to swim far upriver, Garman said.

"It's not an easy thing to say, but it may be the reason that not many American shad are moving beyond Bosher Dam is, there are just none of those fish left."

In the past 20 years, about $9 million in federal, state, local and private money has been spent to bring back shad in the James. With shad numbers low and little to show for the construction of the passage, it's easy to conclude that shad restoration in the James isn't working.

But Garman said the work may be keeping shad from declining beyond the point of no return. "The fact that we still have American shad out there might be some evidence of the success of the program."

. . .

On the James, McCahill and Augustine fished in a johnboat that periodically sent an electric charge into the water, stunning fish long enough to net them.

The men caught two shad in 45 minutes. They measured the fish, checked their health, and put them back.

Shad migrate through Richmond from late March to early June, with the peak running from late April to early May.

Alan Weaver, the game department's fish-passage coordinator, said the number of shad in the James seems to have picked up this year. He hopes that's a good sign.

"We're still trying to give them a chance to make the comeback," Weaver said. "Hopefully, it's not too late."



Contact Rex Springston at (804) 649-6453 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: slideshow,outdoors,james river journal,american shad,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by nirschman on May 25, 2009 at 11:40 pm

whoa, kaptain kirk!!!

where are you coming from with this comment??? (especially if directed at me, which is what it sounds like)

“To say that because you found a particularly good fishing hole means that they are back in full force is ridiculous! Perhaps those who do not have advanced degrees in statistical analysis or marine science should leave the speculation about methodology and data analysis to those who do.
I applaud the scientists working on this project.“

until and unless you have fished the shad run in richmond as much as i have, or you yourself work in marine biology, i don’t think you have any room to criticize me. 

i’ve been fishing the run for at least 10 years, maybe 15 to 20 trips a year on average, from the banks as well as by kayak.  it’s a 5 or 6 week fishery in richmond, from late march to late april. (just in case you didn’t know that ...)

it wasn’t a case of one fishing hole on one particular day, it was a trend that lasted the whole shad season, and to me, it was remarkable.  it’s not that i personally was doing anything different from prior years, or that i’m a better fisherman, or anything like that - you don’t really “target” Americans, per se, they are just part of the “mix” of fish in the river during the shad run ... just in case you’re not a fisherman ... (fisherperson if you need me to be all pc about it ...)

ALL that i was saying is that this year, Spring 2009, about 10 percent of my shad catch was made up of Americans (37 Americans, to be exact).  i have kept detailed numbers of fish caught, dates, and types of fish caught for only the last two years, but i am pretty confident when i say that in the past, FOR ME, only approximately 1 to 3 percent of the shad caught in the james were Americans.  last year, it was 4 fish total, for example, about 1 percent of my catch.  they have always been the (relatively) rare “prize” fish of the spring.  they are SUPPOSED to be released in all chesapeake bay tributaries, and of course, i released all the ones i caught.

and my 5 hardcore shad-fishing buddies ALL caught noticeably greater numbers of american shad this year than in years past.  we all made the same observation!

no, it’s NOT a scientific survey, that’s why i called it ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE (look it up if you don’t understand), but i do think it’s significant, and in fact, i’m going to call vmrc to report my numbers, that’s how significant i think it is.

i am NOT questioning the scientists (i applaud them and their work also!), necessarily, i was just commenting on the incredible disparity between their findings and my (and others’) experience on the james THIS SPRING ONLY.


and i guess you wouldn’t know this from reading my first post, but just for the record, i lean EXTREMELY to the left (as in, almost a full-on tree hugger!) when it comes to environmental issues. i completely agree with you that there has been overfishing and habitat destruction (and water-quality issues, and so on, and so on ...), and i hope and pray that we will be able to fix and solve those problems before it’s too late. 

i’m optimistic - the amount and diversity of life i see on the james river every spring - birds, fish, other aquatic animals - gives me hope that the river has come back and will continue to improve as we continue to make improvements in the way we do things!

so please, don’t attack me for what i think is a very reasonable position/question based on my own experiences on the water over the last decade or so. 

i was just making what i believe to be an informed comment, that’s all ...

Flag Comment Posted by AngelaKirk on May 25, 2009 at 7:31 pm

It doesn’t take a marine biologist to know that Shad numbers are in decline because of what we have done. Their habitat destroyed, breeding grounds dammed, over fished, and a host of other factors to numerous to go in to. To say that because you found a particularly good fishing hole means that they are back in full force is ridiculous! Perhaps those who do not have advanced degrees in statistical analysis or marine science should leave the speculation about methodology and data analysis to those who do.
I applaud the scientists working on this project.

Flag Comment Posted by blackbeered on May 25, 2009 at 8:32 am

If we add up all the money described as being spent on this, it seems to run into the tens of millions of dollars [and lifetime employment for a few, otherwise, unemployables].

WV has its “pork barrel” ... here in VA we have our “fish barrel” projects.

The precious resource being wasted on “guessing games” is taxpayers’ dollars.

Flag Comment Posted by T Dubya on May 25, 2009 at 7:57 am

I can’t believe this article.  I can’t believe the conclusions and the solutions of how to fix the problem.  Global warming?  Really?  How about the tons of illegal fisherman in the city that do not practice catch and release?  I caught 1 American Shad last year and put it back where I found it.  The people a few rocks down cut their’s up for bait.  I also doubt that the new immigrants to this country understand the fishing regulations when they fill their buckets full of fish.  Anyone that spent a lot of time on the South Bank near Anncarrows will tell you what the problem is.  The first solution should be enforcement.  The catch all problem of supposed “global warming” isn’t going to cut it nor blaming professional fisherman.

Flag Comment Posted by compusa on May 25, 2009 at 5:51 am

Hmmm, Shad gone, Blue Crabs gone, Oysters gone- Yet Rockfish now more plentiful than ever.

You unbalance a biological system with a giant predator, and the added pressure of dwindling food because other species (such as humans) eat the same things, and what do you think is gonna happen?

Flag Comment Posted by nirschman on May 25, 2009 at 3:46 am

i have very mixed feelings about this article.

just going by anecdotal evidence, me and my fishing buddies have caught more americans during the shad season that just ended than ever before.

this year, 10 percent of the shad i caught were americans, a HUGE increase over the last few years.

i’m very curious about the numbers and methodology for this survey ... we saw WAY more americans this year than in the past 10 or so years that i’ve been fishing for shad in the james near richmond!!!

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement