1995 murder conviction of SEAL trainee overturned

1995 murder conviction of SEAL trainee overturned

STEVE HELBER/AP

Dustin Turner talked about his case during an interview a year ago at the Powhatan Correctional Facility.

» 13 Comments | Post a Comment
MORE
Special Report/a> - Read more on the crime, the trial and the eventual exoneration of Dustin Turner

The Virginia Court of Appeals yesterday overturned the first-degree murder conviction of a former Navy SEAL trainee in the 1995 slaying of college student Jennifer Lea Evans in Virginia Beach.

In granting an appeal of Dustin Allen Turner, a divided three-judge panel vacated his convictions of murder and abduction with intent to defile and found him guilty only of being an accessory after the fact -- a misdemeanor. The judges remanded the case to the Virginia Beach Circuit Court with instructions to modify the conviction order accordingly.

Turner and fellow SEAL trainee Billy Joe Brown were sentenced to 82 and 72 years respectively in the June 19, 1995, slaying of Evans in a parked car outside a Virginia Beach nightclub.

Brown now says he alone murdered Evans, a 21-year-old student at Emory University. Last summer, Judge Frederick B. Lowe of Virginia Beach Circuit Court told the Appeals Court that he found Brown's new account credible.

In reviewing Turner's petition for a writ of actual innocence, the Appeals Court said that based on the Circuit Court's findings and the nonconflicting evidence from Turner's trial, "we conclude no rational trier of fact could have found Turner guilty of murder or abduction with intent to defile.

"While Turner's conduct creates a suspicion of guilt, the evidence, viewed in the context of Brown's recantation, cannot support findings of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt," the judges wrote.

Linda Summitt, Turner's mother, said yesterday that she had spoken to her son, who is being held at the Powhatan Correctional Center, and described him as happy but cautious about his prospect of freedom.

"It's been a long time in coming," she said. "I'm taking it more as the end of the road. After 14 years we've adjusted to a lot of things, but I've always known he was going to come home."

Summitt, who lives in Indiana, added, "I think God's smiling down on us right now. . . . I'm just thankful Billy Brown found the strength to recant."

Evans' parents, Delores and Al Evans of Atlanta, could not be reached.

A spokesman for Virginia Attorney General Bill Mims was not ready to say whether the case would be appealed, either to the full Court of Appeals or to the Virginia Supreme Court. "We are reviewing the court's opinion," spokesman David Clementson said.

Turner and Evans met at a Virginia Beach nightclub and left together early the morning of June 19, 1995. Brown, who had been drinking heavily at the same club, joined them in the car and got into the back seat.

A witness testified that Turner told him -- as Turner and Evans left the bar -- that they, along with Brown, "were going to have a threesome." Another witness said Brown initially planned to leave with her and not Turner that night.

Under questioning nine days after the slaying, Turner led authorities to where the men left Evans' body in dense woods just off Interstate 64 in Newport News. Turner said Brown killed Evans, Brown said Turner did, and both men were convicted in 1996.

After entering prison and finding religion, Brown said he alone killed Evans by reaching over the front passenger seat and choking her.

Yesterday's opinion included a dissent from Judge Cleo E. Powell, who said the key question was not whether Brown had acted alone in the murder but whether Turner had abducted Evans with the intent to defile her.

"If he did, the fact that Brown may have acted alone in committing the murder does not absolve Turner of his guilt," Powell wrote.

The judge said the record provides evidence to conclude "that Turner deceived Evans into going to his car with the true intent of both he and Brown having a 'threesome' with Evans against her will."

Turner is the first person in Virginia to have a murder conviction overturned under a 2004 law that allows non-DNA evidence of innocence to be considered more than 21 days after sentencing.

If the decision stands, David B. Hargett, Turner's lawyer, said his client would be set free because he would receive credit for time served if his convictions are reduced to being an accessory after the fact -- a Class 1 misdemeanor punishable by no more than 12 months in jail.

"We're very optimistic that this decision will be the decision from the courts, but there's no guarantee," Hargett said.


Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: virginia court of appeals,virginia beach,seal,rk10,jennifer evans,dustin turner,david hargett,billy brown,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Anonymous on August 06, 2009 at 8:28 am

You cannot convict a person of a crime without evidence proven BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT (sorry for the caps but you cannot italicize in these comments – the caps are for emphasis only – I am not shouting).

The Court of Appeals directed the circuit court to make a factual finding on the issue of whether Brown was credible in his assertion that he acted independently in murdering the victim and that Turner had no role in the murder or any restraint of the victim.  The circuit court found Brown to be credible in his testimony that Turner played NO ROLE in the murder or ANY restraint of Evans.

The majority write, “In light of Brown’s recantation, the evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt, at most, that when Turner invited Evans to wait in his vehicle for her friends, he did so with the hope of persuading her to have consensual sexual contact… [and] the record was devoid of evidence supporting a finding that Turner acted with the intent to force Evans into having sex against her will.“

The majority go on to state, “...the dissent makes a fatal leap in logic from Turner’s possible desire to engage in sexual intercourse to his alleged intent to defile Evans.  Turner’s talk of engaging in a threesome, however crass and distasteful, does not establish an intent to defile because no evidence indicates Turner would have forced Evans to engage in such an act against her will.  We conclude as a matter of law that no rational trier of fact could make such an inferential leap on this record.“ 

Therefore, the only connection to the actual murder (based on the charges against Turner) was the charge of abduction with intent to defile, and therefore, if he could not be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of that charge, coupled with Brown’s recantation and testimony previously noted, he therefore has no culpability in Evans’ murder and thus cannot be found guilty of 1st degree murder.

Flag Comment Posted by J-Reb on August 05, 2009 at 9:53 pm

Anon, your point is precise and well-taken.  However I still take issue with (and emphasize) what I believe to be the judges’ emphasis on the sexual aspects, particularly in light of what we know actually happened.

What part of law connects what we believe to have been in one person’s mind when he’s leaving a bar with a woman, with what another person actually does to her?  And more to the point, what if Turner intended to have sex with her, even to ‘defile’ her?  (Leaving aside what constitutes defilement, and whatever relevancy previous experiences of group sex might have there.) In what way would that increase his culpability for the (entirely separate) act of murder?

Flag Comment Posted by justme on August 05, 2009 at 9:12 pm

I disagree with this decision. Why didn’t he have this mind set the night of the crime. He sat next to the victim and did nothing to prevent the crime. Then he help dispose of the body. He wants forgiveness from the family after he let them suffer and wonder about there love one for nine days beofre he returned to where he helped dispose of her.

Flag Comment Posted by Anonymous on August 05, 2009 at 8:37 pm

The judges of the Court of Appeals are not focused on the possibility of casual or group sex - they are focused on whether or not Turner actually abducted Evans with the intent to defile (e.g. rape, sexually assault) her.  Much of counsels’ arguments focused on this important issue.  The opinion states, “...not only must Brown’s recantation negate Turner’s participation in killing Evans, but it must also sever the causal connection between his conduct and the underlying crime that gave rise to the murder.“  Therefore, much weight was given to the idea of Turner and Brown abducting Evans with the intent to force some sexual act on her against her will.  Between Brown’s and Turner’s testimonies, it cannot be proven that this was Turner’s intent.  The fact that it cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Turner intended to defile Evans, coupled with Brown’s testimony that he alone killed Evans means that Turner cannot be found guilty of 1st degree murder by concert of action as the causal connection (abduction w/intent) is severed.

Flag Comment Posted by J-Reb on August 05, 2009 at 6:06 pm

From the opinions:

“Code § 18.2-19 defines the crime of accessory after the fact as a Class 1 misdemeanor. The maximum punishment for an accessory after the fact is twelve months. Code § 18.2-11 further defines the punishment for this misdemeanor as “confinement in jail for not more than twelve months and a fine of not more than $2,500, either or both.” As of this date, Turner has served more than thirteen years in prison.“

It’s an interesting case.  From reviewing the opinions which Anon helpfully linked below, I come away with the clear impression that the judges’ reviews are thoroughly saturated with prurient fascination at the notion of casual sex and—even more unspeakable—group sex. At every turn they show far more interest in these prospects than in the actual murder.  Bias, plain and simple.

Flag Comment Posted by suzn123 on August 05, 2009 at 10:20 am

First of all he has served more time than people that actually commit murder. Military people are like cops, they cover each others backs.

Flag Comment Posted by Anonymous on August 05, 2009 at 10:00 am

So many facts are unreported in this article.  Read the opinion and THEN make comments:

http://www.courts.state.va.us/opinions/opncavwp/1836071.pdf

Flag Comment Posted by tipcpup01 on August 05, 2009 at 9:02 am

Judgment belongs to none of you.

The man never laid a malicious finger on her while she breathed. He did not murder her; his friend did, so he deserves to have his conviction overturned.

Yes he helped dispose of the body. That is why he is guilty of accessory after the fact and obstruction of justice. He’s done 13-14 years of hard time, which is probably an appropriate jail sentence for those crimes which he did commit.

He did his time, and now he’s legally entitled to his rights. Show a little support for those trying to rehabilitate themselves, and who knows, they just may surprise you by having grown into mature citizens.

Flag Comment Posted by MrsPriddy on August 05, 2009 at 8:59 am

I used to work for Mr. Hargett and know all about this case since 2000.  It took a mere seconds for Brown to snap her neck (hello, Navy Seal!) and Turner tried and could not stop Brown.  Turner also stopped Brown from defiling her body and never had any “threesome” plans in the works.  I am glad that the justice system FINALLY worked in VA and I hope that he does make a movie and make millions as he and his family deserve that and more for what they have been through!

Flag Comment Posted by 123456 on August 05, 2009 at 8:42 am

He is just as guilty.  He sat in the front seat next to the victim as his buddy strangled her.  He had the ability to stop her from being murdered and he didnt.  In my opinion, he is just as guilty.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement