With major rules revision, Va. aims to reduce bay pollution
Virginia took a big step yesterday to reduce the amount of pollution that washes off subdivisions, office parks and other new developments.
The Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Board adopted, by a 7-1 vote, the first major revision of state stormwater rules in two decades.
The rules would require developers to do more things, such as building ponds or low-lying gardens, to decrease runoff pollution.
"Today we mark a significant milestone in the protection of the Chesapeake Bay and Virginia's rivers, lakes and streams," Gov. Timothy M. Kaine said.
Regulators see the stormwater crackdown as one piece of the puzzle in restoring the polluted Chesapeake Bay. As the Obama administration leads a renewed bay cleanup, state and federal officials also are considering pollution cuts from farms, suburban lawns and other sources.
The stormwater rules dictate things a developer must do to limit runoff long after a project is finished. That runoff can carry animal waste, oil, grime and other pollution into streams.
Among other things, the rules call for a 38 percent reduction in the amount of phosphorus, a cause of algae, that flows from a site within the bay's watershed.
"We feel that standard is excessive [and not] supported by sound science," Philip F. Abraham, representing a commercial real estate industry group, told the board before the vote.
Many builders say the rules would add to project costs and, ultimately, consumers' bills. State officials say any increased costs would be minimal.
Some observers said they expect opponents to take their case before the General Assembly.
As proposed 11 months ago, the rules called for the 38 percent phosphorus cut statewide. In one of several moves made to address opponents' concerns, the board set a less-stringent limit for waters outside the bay watershed.
Kate G. Wofford, director of the Shenandoah Valley Network, a conservation group, opposed that change. "I believe all Virginians deserve better -- not just those that happen to live in the bay watershed."
Overall, however, Wofford supported the regulations.
Because the rules adopted yesterday differ significantly from those the board proposed last year, the panel decided to set the regulations aside temporarily, hold a comment period from late October to late November and then vote again Dec. 9.
The board is not expected to make significant changes when it votes again.
Contact Rex Springston at (804) 649-6453 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
The Chesapeake Bay has the potential to become the world’s largest open cesspool. If you don’t want your grandchildren to be able to smell it from Richmond, we need to address this problem.
If it’s not higher taxes, regulations is all Democrats have to offer.
Why do developers think it’s the job of state and local governments to clean up their mess? Government can spend billions in remediation, but until the problem is fixed at the source, nothing will change.
This is the first of many steps that the Kaine administration will try to accomplish by the end of his term to address improved water quality of the Chesapeake Bay. Point sources (industrial sources, municipalities, medium & large farms) are already heavily regulated. Now it’s time to target non-point sources (residential areas, golf courses, small farms, vehicles, shopping malls, etc.). Unless people get involved, restrictions or prohibitions will be placed on activities such as: fertilizing lawns, vehicle emission standards, agriculture production, etc. The federal government has spent $2.5B over the passed 5 years in 9 different agencies and 20 different programs to address Bay water quality. A greater amount has been spent by state and municipalities as well as industry and agriculture in the same timeframe to meet regulatory obligations. Voluntary measures are working, but not a pace fast enough to satisfy arbitrary milestones. The same folks driving the effort for a pristine Chesapeake Bay are from the same ilk as those wanting to reform health care. There is no limit on the cost, scope or ramifications as long as the regulations are passed.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement