Analysis: GOP sweep shows policies, not parties, are paramount in Va. politics

» 17 Comments | Post a Comment

A year after tipping Democratic for president for the first time since 1964, Virginia fell to Republicans in a dramatic statewide sweep that is a historic reminder of its enduring competitiveness -- but may not be a model for a national GOP comeback.

"It's not a red state," said Jay Timmons, chief of staff in the governorship of George Allen, whose victory in 1993 led the last Republican resurgence.

"It's a highly competitive state, where voters expect those they elect to be in tune with pocketbook issues, create jobs, and promote growth in the economy. Party is not an issue -- it's who they believe will support the right policies."

Gov.-elect Bob McDonnell easily dispatched the lackluster R. Creigh Deeds, pulling in Republicans for lieutenant governor and attorney general and padding the party's majority in the House of Delegates, by playing to voters' economic anxiety.

Eight years ago, that theme hastened a Democratic comeback, started by Mark R. Warner, a governor-turned-U.S. senator to whom his party will look for a way out of its new wilderness -- one made murkier by approaching GOP-dominated redistricting and 2010 congressional elections in which Democrats will defend control of the U.S. House delegation.

An exit poll for The Associated Press showed that eight in 10 voters were concerned about the economy, and a majority of them backed McDonnell.

Further, economic jitters drove the votes of independents who make up one-third of the electorate. They broke to McDonnell nearly 2-to-1, according to the AP.

In the first Republican sweep since 1997, the double-digit wins by McDonnell; Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, who sought a second term; and Attorney General-elect Ken Cuccinelli suggest that independents shunned their time-honored practice of ticket-splitting.

To Paul Goldman, former state Democratic chairman, this is a reminder of a constant in Virginia politics: wooing conservative-to-moderate independents. They narrowly favored Barack Obama last year in his successful presidential campaign.

"Back out the Obama votes, and this is basically a 50-50 state," Goldman said.

The Virginia victory, a bright spot for a GOP retrenching after Obama's election, may prove a reminder to Republicans of a continuing challenge: broadening the appeal of a party dominated by conservatives.

McDonnell's triumph came in a comparatively thinly attended election. With yesterday's turnout hovering at 39 percent -- down from a record 74 percent last year, when 3.7 million of nearly 5 million voters cast ballots -- the Republicans' strength, fueled by distaste for Obama's policies, was magnified.

"They have not expanded the party," said Larry J. Sabato, an analyst at the University of Virginia who has followed the state's politics for four decades. "They have just motivated their base to show up."

Deeds, outspent about 2-to-1 in television advertising by McDonnell and his allies, had no such luck with Democrats.

His emphasis on McDonnell's law-school thesis in 1989, in which McDonnell made observations about working women, unmarried couples and gay people that 20 years on would seem politically incorrect, proved an ineffective parry to the Republican's economic thrust.

In a stunning reversal from 2008, Democratic turnout fell sharply -- a consequence of party fatigue after a long winning streak and Deeds' inability, despite two visits by the president, to harness the more than 500,000 new voters, many of them young or minorities, who flocked to Obama.

"This was always a big task that lay in front of them; it was always going to be hard," said Kristian Denny Todd, communications director for Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., in his 2006 upset of GOP incumbent Allen.

"It was a personal vote for Obama," she said of last year's win.



Contact Jeff E. Schapiro at (804) 649-6814 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: video,governor's race,creigh deeds,campaign 2009,bob mcdonnell,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by englishsunset on November 05, 2009 at 11:54 am

No.

Flag Comment Posted by squier13 on November 05, 2009 at 12:17 am

“Governor-elect Bob McDonnell(hey,I like the sound of that) ran as an unapologetic conservative.“
*****

Not at all, he ran as a centrist.  McDonnell’s anti-tax message was the only conservative part of his platform.  He didn’t run on any socially conservative issues at all.

Flag Comment Posted by mrright on November 04, 2009 at 8:38 pm

Governor-elect Bob McDonnell(hey,I like the sound of that) ran as an unapologetic conservative.He backtracked a little on the thesis, but that was a non-issue, anyway.
National Republicans need to take notes from Mr.McDonnells campaign for 2010.
Democrat-lite doesn’t win( ala McCain)

Flag Comment Posted by Jeff E. on November 04, 2009 at 4:22 pm

armchair, sorry but your sophomoric comments make you equally or more narrow-minded than the folks you are trying to belittle. The story of this campaign in my mind is the independent voter. I finally saw the light a few years ago and disassociated myself from all party labels after calling myself a Democrat for most of my life. It’s sickening to see both the sore losers and sore winners on here arguing not over principle but over petty names you’d use in a school yard. Repugs? BO? (Yes, I get the double-entendre). Grow up everyone. This is the democratic process that keeps the wheels turning and allows citizens to voice their concerns about the direction their State and country is taking. Stop dumbing it down and if you can’t manage to do that, for the sake of the more intelligent and level-headed readers on here take your garbage to Craigslist’s R&R where it belongs.

Flag Comment Posted by armchair on November 04, 2009 at 4:04 pm

Hey Godfather: You seem to forget that it was the Bush administration that stepped in to invest in American auto companies—not Obama. So I guess that means that Bush was the real socialist? All a bunch of racist nonsense. And Repugs don’t like taxes? Well, who would have guessed?

The “stench” of BO, VaResident? Lot of narrow-minded haters in the GOP—and you’re at the head of the class. Party of fear. Yes, it’s a darn shame that we have a thoughtful, Harvard-educated achiever as our president—a guy who made something of himself—instead of the spoiled, dim-witted, frat-boy knucklehead who preceded him. What IS the world coming to? Gotta love conservatives: dumb and bigoted and proud of it!

Flag Comment Posted by armchair on November 04, 2009 at 3:52 pm

The fact is, a low turnout always favors Repugs, and yesterday’s 39-percent turnout spelled doom for Deeds, that and the terrible economy that Obama inherited from Dubya.  I’ll bet that an absolutely tiny number of African-Americans voted yesterday. The Democratic base seemed tired and unmotivated. So, yes, this round goes to the narrow-minded county and country folk—including a lot of middle-income haters who aren’t quite keen enough to realize that the GOP is the party of Big Business, and Big Business does not care about the interests of average people.

But I’m happy to know that McDonnell will have the economy humming in, what, four months? Eight? And the road problems…soon to be forgotten. And, whew, the state’s budget problems will soon be a memory—EVEN as our taxes are lowered!! It’s so exciting to know that Virginia now has it’s Regent University educated Savior, just like America!

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on November 04, 2009 at 2:48 pm

Great comment GodFather, if your liberal stand up and say your liberal, don’t hide from it….the problem is they will NEVER get elected by being liberal, that’s why they try to hide it.

Flag Comment Posted by GodFather on November 04, 2009 at 2:13 pm

“Posted by grizzman on November 04, 2009 at 1:18 pm
It’s convenient for conservatives to label something “liberally biased” whenever they don’t agree with it, huh?“

And when you dont agree with something, what do you label it?  Probably some 4 letter word not publishable in this forum. Sabato and Shapiro are liberal.  If they are honest, that is not a perjorative, but a description.  If they are not honest, then it probably is a perjorative to them.  But that is not the honest man’s fault, but the dishonest ones.

I fail to see why the label liberal gets liberal’s panties in a bunch.  You dont see conservatives squirming from being called conservatives.  Perhaps it is for the same reason the emperor had no clothes.  Lying to everyone else is one thing, but I guess lying to yourself makes you feel better. Even if it assures your fanny will hang out.

Flag Comment Posted by Bill9d9 on November 04, 2009 at 2:06 pm

“This was always a big task that lay in front of them; it was always going to be hard,“ said Kristian Denny Todd, communications director for Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., in his 2006 upset of GOP incumbent Allen.

“It was a personal vote for Obama,“ she said of last year’s win.

DEAD ON!  Obama won VA by attracting large independents who wanted to be a part of history, and many people including older Virginians, who had never voted before but came out to vote for him. Now that people have seen how Obama governs, all of those independents switched to McDonnell.  There was an almost 25 point swing from Obama to McDonnell.  You don’t have swings like that from just the voting tendencies of the bases of the two parties.  All of the independents switched because they don’t like what Obama and Pelosi are selling (or rather FORCING).

Flag Comment Posted by grizzman on November 04, 2009 at 1:18 pm

It’s convenient for conservatives to label something “liberally biased” whenever they don’t agree with it, huh?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement