2009 General Assembly: Budget debate unfolds

2009 General Assembly: Budget debate unfolds
» 10 Comments | Post a Comment
Read the state budget director's briefing on Gov. Tim Kaine's proposal

-- Budget-balancing -- job one of the 2009 General Assembly -- could require something old (spending cuts), something new (higher taxes), something borrowed (debt-backed bonds) and something blue (Democrats).

The legislature returns Wednesday for a 46-day, election-year session, the overarching theme of which is the deepening recession that has blown another hole -- this time, at least $3.2 billion -- in the two-year, $77 billion budget.

Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, a Democrat heading into the final legislative session of his four-year term, is proposing a patchwork solution that is raising the hackles of allies and adversaries.

Kaine is recommending reductions, even in previously shielded education programs; additional layoffs of state employees, bonds for construction to free up cash, and doubling the cigarette tax to 60 cents per pack to generate $155 million for Medicaid, which provides health care for the poor and aged.

"I've had good discussions with many members of the Republican leadership since I rolled out the budget on December 17, and they are finding a lot of things they like," Kaine said.

He added glibly, "And they are telling me some things they don't like."

. . .

The budget debate will unfold against a highly charged political backdrop. The campaign to choose Kaine's successor is rapidly accelerating. Further, his new job -- chairman of the Democratic National Committee -- threatens to intensify partisan tensions with House of Delegates Republicans, who defend their shrinking majority in the fall.

"It's going to be a very challenging session," said Del. Samuel A. Nixon Jr. of Chesterfield, chairman of the House Republican Caucus. "We want to work with [Kaine] as closely as possible."

But Nixon said that if Kaine, who as DNC boss becomes President-elect Barack Obama's principal partisan missionary, proposes what is perceived as a national Democratic agenda on the legislature, Republicans will balk.

Republicans control the House, holding 53 seats to 45 for the Democrats. Two independents usually vote with the Republicans.

All 100 House seats are up this year. The election is crucial because the majority party will control the next redistricting in 2011, which could determine legislative power for the succeeding decade.

In the Virginia Senate, Democrats hold a slim majority -- 21 of 40 seats. Senators do not face voters for two more years, ensuring a partial Democratic say in redistricting.

. . .

Virginia has been wrestling with a restive economy for nearly two years and previously reduced spending by more than $2 billion. Though the latest projected shortfall is $3.2 billion, it could grow -- forcing even deeper cuts -- if revenue-collection figures due in early February show further erosion because of rising joblessness and sagging sales.

Del. Franklin P. Hall, D-Richmond, a member of the House Finance Committee, where Kaine's proposed cigarette-tax increase could die, said the shortfall might reach $4 billion.

"We have to look at the budget and see where we can do the least damage," said Hall, whose constituents include two groups stung by the Kaine budget: state employees and tobacco workers.

The budget will be the marquee issue of the 2009 session. No less contentious are such proposals as additional restrictions on smoking in public, closing the gun-show loophole on firearm purchases, making it easier to vote early, clamping down on payday and car-title loans, and the early release of nonviolent felons to trim prison costs by $5 million.

With House elections ahead, Nixon said he expects what are known as "brochure bills" -- legislation that does not necessarily become law but can be trumpeted by delegates seeking re-election.

However, delegates must be selective, if not artful, in sponsoring bills. Under the Republican majority, House rules have restricted members to 15 bills. Previously, there were no limits on the number of measures introduced by delegates.

There is no cap on legislation proposed by senators.

E.M. Miller Jr., director of the bill-writing Division of Legislative Services, said drafting requests for legislation have fallen by 600 since last year.

Lawmakers, mindful of public and editorial criticism of protracted overtime in recent sessions, are promising to complete their work within the allotted 46 days.

But Hall said the session could go longer as legislators wrestle with painful spending cuts.

Kaine said Obama's proposed economic-stimulus package, which may clear Congress in February, could provide a fiscal cushion for the state, pumping millions into transportation and other jobs-generating construction projects.

An early Obama ally and vice presidential finalist, Kaine has been advising the incoming president on infrastructure spending. Kaine said the initiative could "lighten our burdens and cares a little bit."

. . .

Interest groups are already lining up against some of Kaine's proposals.

The tobacco industry, including Richmond-based Philip Morris USA, opposes the 30-cent increase in the cigarette tax, while the National Federation of Independent Businesses is resisting Kaine's proposal to eliminate a $64 million-a-year rebate to retailers for collecting the state sales tax.

Michael J. Cassidy, executive director of the Commonwealth Institute, said scrapping or capping the dealer discount should be part of a broader examination by the General Assembly of the cost of industryor interest-specific tax breaks that his economic think tank estimates drain $600 million from the treasury.

"They're illustrative of the hidden side of the budget," Cassidy said. "You put these things into the tax code, and they're on autopilot."

The tobacco tax is favored by hospitals, nursing homes and other health-care providers to prevent further shrinkage in reimbursements from the state under Medicaid and to head off cuts in high-cost services, including pediatrics and mental health.

"Time and time again, health care is one of the first places cut to balance the state budget," said Ann Fleming, a senior vice president at Mountain States Health Alliance, operator of hospitals in rural Southwest Virginia.

"After a while, those cuts add up to a severe impact on access to health care."

Colleges and universities are opposing Kaine's recommended cuts in their budgets. The proposed reductions, up to 15 percent, are highest of any state program.

Sen. Walter A. Stosch, R-Henrico, a senior member of the budget-writing Senate Finance Committee whose district is home to J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College, said he expects lawmakers will attempt to restore some funding for higher education. Contact Jeff E. Schapiro at (804) 649-6814 or .

Contact Tyler Whitley at (804) 649-6780 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: video,timothy m,taxes,latest news,budget,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by plm68 on January 12, 2009 at 11:38 am

Interesting that the State spends $58 million and $12 million on two colleges that offer no benefit to the taxpayer, Richard Bland and VMI. Yet several facilities related to disabilities, etc. are being closed. Hmmm. Which do we need a 1. military college that costs the taxpayer twice as much per student as any other VA school, or 2. facilities for the treatment of mental and physical disabilities? Hmmm. Difficult decision?

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on January 12, 2009 at 9:44 am

I can’t help thinking this crisis would not be so bad not past Assemblies decided to usurp things once done on a local level. We pay for a bloated Education Department, but not one person there teaches anyone. Isn’t that what ‘education’ is supposed to be about? There’s a lot of money going to Richmond that could be well spent on the local level, but we’ve created a monster that rakes off its share before returning it to where it should never have left in the 1st place. Now, localities have to go begging for grant money or has to fund mandates imposed by Richmond.

Flag Comment Posted by ramgrl on January 11, 2009 at 7:32 pm

Do you ever just want to look at our government and say “Really?“? Cause seriously I’m starting to wonder if Kaine’s new position as ring leader is starting to affect his judgement as governor of Virginia. Why on Earth would you tax the ONE industry that is the foundation of this state? Especially when you know full good and well it won’t pass. How about a tax on gasoline? Maybe a good $.50 per gallon. Think it will mean less gas use? GOOD! We use too much gas here in non efficient vehicles anyway.
But no, lets cut education (cause we REALLY need more ignorant people in this state) and public safety (cause who needs cops) and then let out the “non violent” criminals. Brilliant. Lets cut back on public higher education, especially considering that 90% of all of those healthcare workers in VA graduated from public universities like VCU and UVA.
But my opinion doesn’t matter anymore than anyone elses does on here. We may elect them all with hopes of actually getting something worthwhile but in the end they all band together in their little groups and do exactly what THEY want anyway. None of them live in the real world where their jobs are in jeopardy, they may not be able to feed their children or they are losing their homes. They have NO CLUE what the real world is like and frankly I don’t think they care to find out.

Flag Comment Posted by Willi on January 11, 2009 at 12:45 pm

California is the worst model on how to run an government. We can close down once or twice a month, but be prepared for delays at every level of govt. and don’t complain about service One problem now is too much time off. Less time off and more pay would mean fewer employees and a net savings in payroll and all benefits. One of the obvious solutions the lawmakers are too ignorant to see.

Flag Comment Posted by Tiamet on January 11, 2009 at 10:27 am

If the health industry in Virginia was REALLY concerned about health issues then they would start taxing junk food, fast food and snacks.
More health issues and health related issues are caused by obesity than by cigarettes!
Virginia has one of the highest diabetes problems in the nation.  Why…obesity!
So, if the state is going to tax just for the sake of taxing, be honest about it.  If the state is going to tax for health reasons, then they should rethink what they are taxing.

Flag Comment Posted by james on January 11, 2009 at 8:41 am

There will be no tax increase on anything. It seems uber-liberal Democrats like Kaine are too stupid to figure out that a cigarette tax never raises what they think it will, and that you don’t raise taxes on anything in a recession.

Flag Comment Posted by Kant Seay on January 11, 2009 at 8:38 am

California is giving state employees the first and third Fridays of the month as unpaid leave. Virginia could do the same.

Rather than single out cigarettes why not impose a 1 percent additional sales
tax on all non essential purchases. Movie tickets, restaurant meals, beer, wine and liquor sales etc.

Flag Comment Posted by zerro on January 11, 2009 at 7:36 am

,,leave the cigs alone !!isn,t it bad enough that you took all the billions in suit money,and gave none to the smokers,,but instead spent it foolishly,,and now hiding behind a medical lie to justify an increase,,where is our money !!where are our drug vachures for patches,gum,etc ..and where are our smoking clinic to help us quit !!the tobaco co. sprayed our cigs with nicotine to get us hooked for life,,and all you do is keep taxing us !!how evil and sick is that of you !!!

Flag Comment Posted by Willi on January 11, 2009 at 6:41 am

Every agency should only do what is required by law; no extras and change the law when needed. No CVC, no holiday door decorating contests, no more “school buddy” programs unless civil leave is used, no poster programs for Dept. of Avaition, no $ to public TV and radio. All state cars to employees who telecommute should be stopped. Enforce it when someone has no work, they must go help another area. So far, there is still much waste. Meanwhile, due to layoffs, two of my computer programs don’t work and everyone who knows it all is VITA and they are laid off; no one knows what to do. I guess some folks won’t get benefits. Commissioners need to hold their deputies accountable: studies are started, then stopped 6 months later. Somehow increase health co-pays to retirees so more can leave. In my area, there are 22 people. All but one is over 50, most have 30 years. We are slower than the young, five are out on sickness (can’t afford to retire), and with vacations staffing is only at 71%. No one is taking a look at the full picture. The General Assembly is part time and with a one-term Governor, systemic problems can’t be fixed.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement