Bolling ties state budget cuts to Wagner’s revenue forecasts

 

Related Info

CAMPAIGN 2009
The politics of pain. Fixing blame for the state’s budget woes will be a key topic of debate in the race for Lieutennant Governor.

» 5 Comments | Post a Comment

As Virginia again braces for budget cuts, Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling is trying to make the past of Jody Wagner, his Democratic opponent in the November election, come back to haunt her.

Bolling, a Hanover County Republican who is seeking re-election, says overly optimistic revenue forecasts by Wagner -- as Virginia's secretary of finance -- and the administration of Gov. Timothy M. Kaine have resulted in the series of painful budget cutbacks the state has been undergoing for the past two years.

"Nonsense," said Wagner, a Virginia Beach businesswoman who resigned as finance secretary in January to run for lieutenant governor.

Faced with declining revenues, Kaine has proposed more than $7 billion in budget cuts in the past two years that include employee layoffs, furloughs, closed prisons and reduced aid to higher education.

Wagner says a global economic meltdown that no one could have predicted -- or, for that matter, did predict -- has led to the sharp decline in tax revenues.

"Who would have predicted that [investment banking firms] Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers would go out of business or that General Motors would file for bankruptcy?" she asked. "Those were the result of the failed economic policies of the Bush administration."

Wagner said every state is in the same predicament, although Virginia's economic situation is better than that of most other states.

But Bolling countered that he and other Republicans warned in December 2007 that the Kaine administration's revenue projections were too high.

"Every economist in late 2007 and early 2008 was forecasting an economic decline," Bolling said. He did not answer when asked whether he expected a decline as precipitous as the one that occurred.

Bolling pointed to an opinion article in the Richmond Times-Dispatch from early January last year in which he wrote:

"While I hope that economic conditions improve and our economy will grow at a rate of 6.6 percent in the 2010 fiscal year, we cannot be certain of that, and we should not base our budget on such an overly optimistic revenue forecast."

In the same article, Bolling noted that "it is important to remember that while state revenues are not increasing as rapidly as had been expected, they are still increasing."

Instead of 3.3 percent growth in the 2008-09 fiscal year and 6.6 percent in the 2009-10 fiscal year, the tax revenues are projected to decline an estimated 10.8 percent in the two years, Bolling said.

"It was her responsibility," Bolling said of Wagner.

Wagner noted that drawing up the budget is a bipartisan process that also asks members of the business community to chip in with their economic projections. Bolling never attended any of the budget meetings, she said.

Bolling said he was not a member of the Governor's Advisory Board of Economists, so it was "illogical for me to attend."

The state's secretary of finance helps preside over spending and revenue decisions on which the state budget is drawn up.

Kaine appointed Wagner as secretary of finance in 2006, after she served the previous four years as the state treasurer under then-Gov. Mark R. Warner.

Speaking to the legislature's money committees last month, Kaine said the nation officially went into recession in December 2007. That same December, Kaine rejected Republican suggestions that he should reconvene an advisory economic forecasting group to lower the revenue forecasts.

To do so "might be interpreted by the public as a sign of panic," Kaine said. An updated forecast could be made two months later, he noted. In February, he reduced budget projections by more than $800 million.



Contact Tyler Whitley at (804) 649-6780 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: lieutenant governor,jody wagner,campaign 2009,bill bolling,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by GuidoMcGinty on September 14, 2009 at 10:46 am

Wagner says a global economic meltdown that no one could have predicted—or, for that matter, did predict—has led to the sharp decline in tax revenues.

“Who would have predicted that [investment banking firms] Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers would go out of business or that General Motors would file for bankruptcy?“ she asked. “Those were the result of the failed economic policies of the Bush administration.“

David Einhorn exposed Lehman’s fake balance sheet more than a year before the implosion.

Peter Schiff called game over on all the investment banks, especially Bear in 2006.

Nouriel Roubini, econ prof at NYU, foretold the crash in 2005:

In September 2006, he warned to a skeptical IMF that: “The United States is likely to face a once-in-a-lifetime housing bust, an oil shock, sharply declining consumer confidence, and, ultimately, a deep recession.“ He also foresaw “homeowners defaulting on mortgages, trillions of dollars of mortgage-backed securities unraveling worldwide and the global financial system shuddering to a halt”

These guys were not alone but they were seen as crackpots by the majority.

Flag Comment Posted by JunoMoneta on September 14, 2009 at 7:38 am

Lt. Gov. Bolling is right.  By late 2007 it was clear to most level headed people who follow Virginia’s finances that the Kaine administration’s figures were at best over optimistic, and at worst flat out delusional.

Flag Comment Posted by Willi on September 14, 2009 at 6:54 am

The economic fiasco and downturn is a direct result of Bush’s handling of the economy and letting Wall Street run rampant while dismembering and disempowering regulations. Don’t blame the dem’s, blame Bush and his Republican Congress.  (I am a fiscal conservative and independent.)

Flag Comment Posted by Captjay20010 on September 14, 2009 at 3:38 am

http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/06/12/illegal-aliens-cost-virginia-taxpayers-17-billion-annually

WOW, I find this interesting…..wasn’t our buget cuts about 1.35 billion?

The Federation of American Immigration Reform has released an important study quantifying the costs that Virginia taxpayers bear to support the continued unlawful presence of illegal aliens in Virginia.  The total estimated costs reach nearly $1.7 billion dollars per year for the nearly 300,000 illegal aliens present in Virginia.  If we didn’t have this huge sucking chest wound tearing into the state budget, Virginia likely would not have had to undergo this year’s earlier budget scramble that ended up reducing the services provided to citizens and legal immigrants.  The Cost of Illegal Immigration to Virginia is a must-read for anyone interested in the facts about what results when government at any level decides to look the other way when millions of people wantonly break our laws.

Flag Comment Posted by xxxx on September 14, 2009 at 2:51 am

Wasn’t there an article recently in the RTD regarding which forcasts (more conservative or liberal assumptions)  the Governor would go with in determining this latest budget shortfall?

Seems to me that if that is the case then it appears to be routine for the Governor to pick and choose which set of assumptions to apply to give him the amounts that he wants to see, which may or may not be the actual numbers. 

This time they chose to go with the conservative assumptions meaning a higher budget deficit, but how about in the past?  Did they choose the more liberal assumptions in order to have more money to spend and to balance the budget?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement