Kaine, GOP at odds over IT agency
Published: June 24, 2009
Updated: June 24, 2009
Democratic Gov. Timothy M. Kaine and General Assembly Republicans are wrestling over who should run Virginia's computer super-agency as a state report urges financial penalties for delays by the giant firm hired to provide information technology services.
During an online chat yesterday at the Richmond Times-Dispatch, Kaine said the Virginia Information Technologies Agency would be more accountable if its director reported directly to the governor.
The agency's boss currently is hired and fired by its oversight board. The panel is made up of gubernatorial and legislative appointees, with the majority from the executive branch.
Kaine said that the "lack of direct accountability at the agency-head level has created some of the challenges" roiling VITA.
The agency's trustees this month ousted Lemuel C. Stewart Jr. as chief information officer after he complained that Northrop Grumman is not fulfilling its obligations under a $2.3 billion contract with the state to provide the IT services. It is Virginia's richest privatization pact.
Stewart was temporarily replaced with Leonard M. "Len" Pomata, Kaine's technology secretary. Pomata also is a member of the VITA board.
Kaine defended Northrop Grumman, which has donated more than has $808,000 to Virginia political candidates of both parties since 2001, including $76,000 to his campaign and inauguration.
"Generally, the issue has been VITA management of the contractor rather than the contractor itself," Kaine said.
Northrop Grumman spokeswoman Christy Whitman said in an e-mail the ongoing shift to a privately run IT system "will take continued commitment and drive."
Stewart's firing and complaints about poor service by Northrop Grumman have triggered an investigation by a Virginia Senate panel. The House Science and Technology Committee yesterday announced it, too, will look into the VITA-Northrop Grumman partnership.
Del. Samuel A. Nixon Jr., R-Chesterfield, one of the General Assembly's IT experts and a sponsor of the 2003 bill creating VITA, wants the board to rescind Pomata's appointment.
Nixon, also head of the House Republican Caucus, argued in a letter to VITA board chairman James F. McGuirk II that having the same person in dual roles disrupts "the delicate system of checks and balances" and creates the "appearance of impropriety."
During this year's General Assembly session, Nixon sponsored legislation -- it was signed into law by Kaine -- that added the state finance secretary to the VITA board and designated the technology secretary as vice-chairman.
That was done to strengthen the governor's role in the management of VITA, since both secretaries are executive-branch appointees, Nixon said.
In a little-noticed report in February, the General Assembly's accountant said it was unlikely Northrop Grumman would complete on time the first phase of its contract with the state.
The company has until June 30 to finish an inventory of computers at state agencies, a necessary step for Northrop Grumman to determine how to service them -- and at what price.
But the report, by Auditor of Public Accounts Walter J. Kucharski, said VITA should use the power of the purse to keep Northrop Grumman in line. Delays have contributed to a deficit at VITA, now $6.2 million.
"We recommend that VITA continue to work with Northrop Grumman to complete these milestones at an acceptable level, and institute financial penalties when necessary until the milestones are completed," said Kucharski, a non-voting member of the VITA board.
Stewart was fired after urging the state to withhold a $14 million monthly payment to Northrop Grumman, alleging that -- as part of a pattern of inferior work -- it had failed to properly itemize its bill.
Contact Olympia Meola at (804) 649-6812 or
.
Contact Jeff E. Schapiro at (804) 649-6814 or .
Politics editor Andrew Cain and staff writer Jim Nolan contributed to this report.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Ok, which is it.
The Gov supports VITA/NG as doing good work as previously reported
or is it
They don’t work directly for me so don’t blame me for the problems?
Has it not occurred to Gov. Kaine that if the contractor performed as it contracted to do, Virginia wouldn’t need to “manage the contractor” with a huge expensive agency. How much money are we spending just trying to manage the contractor?
This entire exercise is disingenuous. It is only for Executive branch agencies, I guess they are the only ones wasting IT dollars and have security concerns. VITA’s predecessor DIT, whispered in the legislature and Warner’s ears to keep their jobs. State Agencies grew their own IS shops because DIT was unresponsive and behind the times and should have been abolished, They had made a nightmare of technology procurement prior to it being delegated to DGS(dept of General Services), but got it back under the mantra of controlling spending, Ha! DIT had a mainframe mentality and VITA its successor are micro management control freaks, more about more and more bureaucracy than efficient operation. Most state agencies were pretty efficient and their expertise was distributed, now it is centralized, the governor and the legislature rather than dealing with the accounting issues of not having good reporting on spending used that excuse to centralize and control, what they did was pass the buck, 2.3 billion of them to be precise, to NG.
Based on the report, Kaine already has two representatives on the oversight board who report directly to him, and the majority of the Board appointees are appointed by the Executive Branch. On that basis he clearly has sufficient sources of both information and influence.
It is becoming increasing clear that neither the Governor nor General Assembly are overseeing and communicating with those they’ve appointed to the Oversight Board - it is unlikely that changing the organizational chart would change that situation. The solution is for both Kaine and the General Assembly to oversee their own representatives on the Board and make their appointees accountable for the results of the VITA/Northrop-Grumman agreement.
In my opinion, the VITA/Northrop-Grumman partnership was established and both the Governors and members of the General Assembly have since left it to its own devices - “on autopilot” - without effective oversight and management.
As accountable as the Superintendent of the State Police or the Director of the Department of Health Professions?
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Advertisement