Polls find Wilder’s opinion means little to voters
P. KEVIN MORLEY/TIMES-DISPATCH
Last week, former Gov. L. Douglas Wilder declined to endorse either candidate for governor.
Two polls showed yesterday that an endorsement or non-endorsement by former Gov. L. Douglas Wilder means little to Virginia's voters.
"Wait until Election Day. We'll see," Wilder replied during a brief interview in his office at Virginia Commonwealth University.
Wilder, a Democrat, last week declined to endorse either Democrat R. Creigh Deeds or Republican Bob McDonnell for governor. President Barack Obama and Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, had personally urged Wilder to back Deeds.
But Wilder criticized Deeds for his willingness to raise taxes during a recession and for favoring the repeal of a law that Wilder initiated in 1991 to limit handgun sales to one a month per customer.
A survey released yesterday by Public Policy Polling found that 23 percent of voters said they were less likely to vote for a candidate endorsed by Wilder. Only 8 percent said his endorsement would make them more likely to vote for the candidate. Sixty-nine percent said Wilder's opinion has no effect.
The poll found that Deeds' favorability rating among black voters -- 73 percent -- is higher than the 67 percent for Wilder, the nation's first-elected black governor.
A Rasmussen poll released yesterday found that 6 percent said Wilder's non-endorsement would make it more likely for them to vote for Deeds, while 10 percent said less likely. Eighty percent said it made no difference.
Wilder said he wasn't trying to exert influence on the Nov. 3 election but was trying to initiate a discussion of two issues that he thought needed to be discussed.
"It has caused people to think," said Wilder, who served as governor from 1990 to 1994 and as mayor of Richmond from 2004 to 2008.
"I wanted to let the voters decide themselves," Wilder said.
Wilder added: "A lot of people were upset because of it."
Obama, who placed a call to Wilder in August, had sent an emissary to meet with Wilder in Richmond in July.
Wilder said yesterday that he is even less likely to endorse Deeds now because of new information showing that the state will have to borrow over a billion dollars from the federal government because it is running out of unemployment insurance money. That makes a tax increase even more onerous, he said.
Deeds has said he would sign a tax increase to pay for transportation improvements as long as it emerged from a bipartisan consensus.
About Wilder's perceived influence, Public Policy Polling's communications director Tom Jensen concluded:
"Basically, the Wilder endorsement, or lack thereof, is something the chattering class is considerably more interested in than real voters."
The poll found that 36 percent of Virginians have a favorable opinion of Wilder, with 33 percent viewing him unfavorably.
Contact Tyler Whitley at (804) 649-6780 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
No need to wait. The game works like this, whoever loses - Wilder reminds us he did not endorse the loser. Me being a positive type, I’m endorsing both candidates and hope one will forever be in my debt. Go Bob! Go Creigh! Reply to this post after the election to let me know what high level job I will get as my reward. StillintheCity (alloneword).
This “NEWS” story had its desired effect, only 10:00 in the morning and already 20 comments.
Obama called Doug personally because he obviously does not know the climate in Richmond and is not fully aware of the village idiot’s record…other than that, who gives a rat’s butt what Doug thinks, the voters certainly don’t and we are the ones who are casting the votes…careful, if Doug comes out at the last minute, let’s hope he stays a republican, although he declares democrat, maybe he’ll start his new party, the republicrats and they’ll get their own island and float all the way to h—- and away from Virginia.
I could care less what Doug Wilder thinks. He lost respect and support from people of all races when he was mayor in Richmond. As a black female, I will vote for the best candidate out of the two we have running. Do I like either one? NO! But I am not influenced at all but Doug Wilder. What we will see on election day is that I am not the only one.
At this point in his life the only people who care what Doug has to say is the media because it provides a story for them.
Do not under estimate the power of Doug Wilder. This man has a brilliant mind, even though I have never agreed with his agenda on anything. He can still carry a big stick and bears watching.
“Nice try, RTD, but Wilder refusing to endorse Deeds is a HUGE blow to his campaign. It means the urban blacks stay home, and that means Deeds loses.“
You think black voters can’t think for themselves or decide on their own who to vote for? Grow up mikeyt… or do you base your vote on who some inconsequential white politician endorses?
Both candidates are better off without Wilder’s endorsement. If it were me, I really wouldn’t want a money grubbing, cheating mayor to endorse me either. Kiss of death. Kiss. Of. Death.
I don’t know how and why some people think that what Dougs says has any impact on black people voting. Just in case you have not been paying attention when Doug left the mayor’s office he had very little support from black and white most people in Richmond hated the man after his time in office. The only person Wilder is important too is Wilder. As far as Obama calling on Wilder to endorse Deeds it is clear that Obama was not aware of the damaget o himself that Wilder caused and Obama was wrong to try to get Doug involved and yes I am an Obama supporter but this was the wrong move for him to make. He never should have got Doug involved.
I don’t get it. “We’ll see” what?
If what some of you are saying is true, then Wilder’s non-endorsement is an effort to lower African-American participation in the election?
Huh? Wilder just gets crazier and more marginal by the minute.
Wilder refuses to endorse a man (Deeds) who’s already lagged in the polls since Day 1, often behind by double-digit margins. I mean, c’mon, there’s no magic or influence there! This whole thing must be a joke. It’s like going to the race track, spotting a car that’s sputtering smoke, its tires falling off, then saying “I predict that car is going to lose. You wait & see. I will be right.“
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement