U.Va. needs giving for Groh to go
CHARLOTTESVILLE It's the time of year for charity, and the University of Virginia has an opportunity for you.
The athletic department quietly has been raising funds to pay the estimated $4 million that it will take to run football coach Al Groh out of town.
Groh is 3-8 in his ninth season of coaching the Cavaliers, including a loss to William and Mary to open the season. He will almost certainly coach his final game in orange and blue Saturday against Virginia Tech.
But after receiving an extension at the end of the 2007 season, Groh will have two years remaining on his contract, which pays him about $2 million a year. If he were fired, Groh would be owed the entire amount remaining.
Financially, giving is down across the board this year, but U.Va. athletics also have been hit by a dramatic drop in football attendance, which is the school's top money-maker.
After selling nearly 60,000 seats per game in 2007, this year's final number will be 48,407 after adding in Saturday's sellout. At prices ranging from $23 to $42 over seven games, the school has taken a significant hit.
So while it makes financial sense to fire Groh, that's not an item accounted in the department's yearly budget -- hence the University's fundraising.
Director of Athletics Craig Littlepage declined an interview request from The Times-Dispatch this week, but earlier in the season, he was quoted as saying that any buyout given to Groh would not affect the department as a whole.
"I think it's safe to say that you would have philanthropic commitments in place to help handle these sorts of situations," he told the Roanoke Times.
Obviously, that won't be handled as a high-profile campaign, but rather Littlepage and company approaching top donors to see if they'd contribute.
He's become too familiar with this kind of appeal recently after paying men's basketball coach Dave Leitao the $2.1 million his contract required if he was fired -- though officially, Leitao resigned.
Both Leitao and Groh were ACC coaches of the year in 2007 before beginning their descent.
Groh consistently has deflected talk of his future this season. He did the same Monday.
"It's not really about me," he said. "It's about the team and it's about the players. You know, that's all I'm really thinking about, so I don't really have any thoughts on it."
The choice of a new football coach also will affect the bottom line. If the school chose to go with a FCS coach such as Richmond's Mike London, his yearly salary probably would be lower than Groh's -- previous coaches making the leap have received in the neighborhood of $1.3 million.
But if the Cavs went with a big-name hire such as Tommy Tuberville, they'd probably have to pay him at least the $3.3 million he made in his final season at Auburn.
The outlay is huge but important for the U.Va. athletics department. The money brought in from football is $20.2 million annually, according to the school's report to the Department of Education. That's more than twice as much as the next highest sport, basketball.
With that much on the line, the school can claim it's passing the hat this month for a good cause.
Contact Michael Phillips at (804) 649-6546 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Most of you whining about the money in college football have no clue what you’re talking about.
1) Most university athletic programs, including UVa and Va Tech, are self-sufficient; a.k.a. they are funded SOLELY by athletic receipts and contributions. No general fund money goes into the program.
2) Athletic scholarships are awarded yearly, just like academic scholarships, and like students on academic scholarship, an athlete’s GPA can fall below the 2.0 NCAA standard once. The second time it happens they lose the scholarship. The difference between students on academic and athletic scholarship is students on athletic scholarship have the added responsibility of spending a minimum of 20 hours a week away from their studies playing their sport.
3) Most schools require athletes to meet the same academic entrance standards as non-athletes, including UVa and Va Tech. There are exceptions; for example, basketball players at Duke do not have to meet the same academic entrance standards as non-athletes. Duke, that horrible academic university.
4) According to the Journal for Higher Education, the graduation rate for football players at NCAA schools is 67%. That means two-thirds get their degrees within a six-year period. The rate for all students at the same schools is 65%.
5) Something like 240 players are drafted by the NFL each year and about another 180 are signed as free agents. There are more than 7,000 players on rosters of the 120 FBS schools each year. The HUGE majority of college players never get even a shot at the pros. To suggest college football is NFL training camp for most players is an absolutely vacuous statement.
I have watched enough ACC football, the ACC needs to stick to basketball! As a football conference ACC stands for All Cupcake Conference! If tech gets LSU in the Gator or Chick-filet bowl they will get crushed!!!
Clemson got hammered by South Carolina today, FSU is getting pounded by Florida, ACC football sucks!!! Don’t be surprised if Georgia beats GT tonight.
Bald Chicken - Did Tech stop teaching English? The plural of “party” is “parties” and I think you meant “their” social calendar. Congrats on loyally watching a team which finished 3rd in the ACC. I hope it takes you far.
The reason the stadium is not selling out is because the UVA “fans” are conflicted with all of the wine and cheese partys they must attend to maintain there social calendar. Plus they are tired of getting their sportcoats and ties dirty at the games. Scott Stadium may sell out today thanks to Hokie fans.
Season ticket sales have fallen? You don’t say. Maybe it’s because people like me, whose family had season tickets and loyally supported the Cavs for over 30 years, through good times and bad, couldn’t afford the $6,000 “voluntary contribution” to the Virginia Athletics Fund it would have taken to keep our seats. Keep Groh, fire Groh, it’s all the same to me. I’ve had it with the whole program.
I agree with “questiongovt” and “HanoverHarry’s” 11/27 post.
All most college football is for training for the NFL, partly because very few of the players graduate with a degree. They usually are plucked by the football leagues for lofty, inflated salaries, but in the real world, cannot hold a job or get into trouble with the law.
Also, in this day and age when money is very tight, marginal football teams should be disbanded. The money that goes to the teams could be well spent for faculty salaries. After all, they are primarily students, football players second, but somehow priorities have been reversed. The only reason they can get a football scholarship is because they can carry or throw the football a few yards, never mind their academics. Most of them cannot speak in a coherent sentence when questioned by the press and I dare say they cannot write a decent paragraph, either.
Ditto for HanoverHarry 11/27—they wouldn’t be accepted solely on their academic merits.
Div 1 football is nothing more than training camp for the NFL. I’d bet that less than 5% of VT or UVA’s football team would have any shot at being accepted to the school if they weren’t football players.
Charlie Strong, of the University of Florida, is the next GREAT future coach. Someone will make him a head coach this year, UVA probably will miss the boat. I am a Gator and sadly admit that I was upset when we hired Urban Myer instead of bringing back “the old ball coach”, I am not upset now!
Let me begin by acknowledging that there are benefits that accrue to Universities as a result of their football programs. I readily acknowledge, too, that much of the money that supports these programs comes from donations restricted to athletics. That said, the multi-million dollar investments in Division I football facilities, programs and coaches salaries, has reached the point at which they are greatly disproportionate to the benefits that accrue to the academic programs of our Universities. It is time they are brought back in line with the benefits to the Universities’ overall academic mission.
Especially at a time when our Universities lack the funding necessary for affordable tuition, adequate academic facilities, and faculty, it is, in my opinion, unconscionable that we spend so much on what is, primarily, entertainment. It is long past time for the NCAA to cease pretending as if most college football players are “student-athletes” Division I programs far too many are essentially NFL-trainees with little interest in academics.
I would very much like to see athletic scholarships administered like all other scholarships, and contributions for athletic scholarships given to and administered by our Universities’ general scholarship funds. In that case, while contributors might elect to designate their gifts for “athletic scholarships”, the dollars contributed to “athletic scholarships” would be administered by the Academic Divisions in consultation with, but not controlled by Athletic Administration.
“Groh, best thing that ever happened to Virginia….......Tech.“
The best thing to happen to Virginia Tech is its miserable failure against superior competition such as Alabama, USC, LSU, Kansas, Georgia, Auburn. It provides me great joy to watch the football team that had no fans before Michael Vick showed up can talk so much and gibberish and can’t back it up. I am a SEC fan, so every time one of our teams embarrasses the overrated Hokies, I love it!
On the subject of Al Groh, $4 million is a bargain. If Mike Landon is smart like I believe he is, he won’t bother with UVa.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement